Zimmerman Federico, Bailey David D, Muric Goran, Ferrara Emilio, Schöne Jonas, Willer Robb, Halperin Eran, Navajas Joaquín, Gross James J, Goldenberg Amit
Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02163, USA.
Digital, Data, & Design Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02163, USA.
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 15;3(10):pgae395. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae395. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Political segregation is a pressing issue, particularly on social media platforms. Recent research suggests that one driver of segregation is -people's preference for others in their political group who have more extreme (rather than more moderate) political views. However, acrophily has been found in lab experiments, where people choose to interact with others based on little information. Furthermore, these studies have not examined whether acrophily is associated with animosity toward one's political out-group. Using a combination of a survey experiment ( = 388) and an analysis of the retweet network on Twitter (3,898,327 unique ties), we find evidence for users' tendency for acrophily in the context of social media. We observe that this tendency is more pronounced among conservatives on Twitter and that acrophily is associated with higher levels of out-group animosity. These findings provide important in- and out-of-the-lab evidence for understanding acrophily on social media.
政治隔离是一个紧迫的问题,尤其是在社交媒体平台上。最近的研究表明,隔离的一个驱动因素是人们更喜欢政治团体中持有更极端(而非更温和)政治观点的人。然而,在实验室实验中发现了趋高偏好,即人们在信息极少的情况下选择与他人互动。此外,这些研究尚未考察趋高偏好是否与对政治外群体的敌意有关。通过结合一项调查实验(N = 388)和对推特转发网络(3,898,327条独特关系)的分析,我们发现了社交媒体环境下用户存在趋高偏好倾向的证据。我们观察到这种倾向在推特上的保守派中更为明显,并且趋高偏好与更高程度的外群体敌意相关。这些发现为理解社交媒体上的趋高偏好提供了重要的实验室内外证据。