• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我优先化的时间分布特征。

The temporal profile of self-prioritization.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.

School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2024 Oct;125:103763. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103763. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2024.103763
PMID:39369462
Abstract

Personal relevance exerts a powerful influence on decisional processing, such that arbitrary stimuli associated with the self are classified more rapidly than identical material linked with other people. Notwithstanding numerous demonstrations of this facilitatory effect, it remains unclear whether self-prioritization is a temporally stable outcome of decision-making. Accordingly, using a shape-label matching task in combination with computational modeling, the current experiment investigated this matter. The results were informative. First, regardless of the target of comparison (i.e., friend or stranger), self-prioritization was a persistent product of decision-making across the testing session. Second, a variant of the standard drift diffusion model in which decisional boundaries collapsed gradually over the course of the task best fit the observed data. Third, whereas the efficiency of stimulus processing increased for other-related stimuli during the task, it decreased for self-related material. Collectively, these findings advance understanding of the temporal profile of self-prioritization.

摘要

个人相关性对决策过程有强大的影响,例如,与自我相关的任意刺激比与他人相关的相同材料更快地被分类。尽管有大量关于这种促进效应的证明,但自我优先化是否是决策的一个时间稳定的结果仍然不清楚。因此,本实验使用形状-标签匹配任务结合计算建模来研究这个问题。结果很有启发性。首先,无论比较的对象(即朋友或陌生人)是什么,自我优先化都是整个测试过程中决策的一个持久产物。其次,一种标准的漂移扩散模型的变体,其中决策边界在任务过程中逐渐崩溃,最适合观察到的数据。第三,尽管在任务过程中与他人相关的刺激的处理效率提高了,但与自我相关的材料的处理效率却下降了。总的来说,这些发现增进了对自我优先化的时间特征的理解。

相似文献

1
The temporal profile of self-prioritization.自我优先化的时间分布特征。
Conscious Cogn. 2024 Oct;125:103763. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103763. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
2
Self-prioritization and perceptual matching: The effects of temporal construal.自我优先排序与感知匹配:时间构想的影响
Mem Cognit. 2017 Oct;45(7):1223-1239. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0722-3.
3
Parts of me: Identity-relevance moderates self-prioritization.自我的一部分:身份相关性调节自我优先化。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Jan;77:102848. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102848. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
Self-prioritization of fully unfamiliar stimuli.完全陌生刺激的自我优先排序。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Aug;72(8):2110-2120. doi: 10.1177/1747021819832981. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
5
Valence and ownership: object desirability influences self-prioritization.价态和所有权:客体吸引力影响自我优先化。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01235-w. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
6
Electrophysiological correlates of self-prioritization.自我优先化的电生理相关性。
Conscious Cogn. 2023 Feb;108:103475. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103475. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
7
More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.或多或少的我和你:自我相关性增强了项目概率对刺激优先化的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jun;86(4):1145-1164. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01562-x. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
8
Self-relevance prioritizes access to visual awareness.自我关联性优先确保视觉意识的获取。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Mar;43(3):438-443. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000361.
9
Exploring the self-ownership effect: Separating stimulus and response biases.探索自我所有权效应:区分刺激偏差和反应偏差。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Feb;44(2):295-306. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000455. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
10
Self-relevance enhances evidence gathering during decision-making.自我相关性增强决策过程中的证据收集。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Sep;209:103122. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103122. Epub 2020 Jun 25.