• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我相关性增强决策过程中的证据收集。

Self-relevance enhances evidence gathering during decision-making.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.

School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, England, UK.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Sep;209:103122. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103122. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103122
PMID:32593776
Abstract

Despite repeated demonstrations that self-relevant material is prioritized during stimulus appraisal, a number of unresolved issues remain. In particular, it is unclear if self-relevance facilitates task performance when stimuli are encountered under challenging processing conditions. To explore this issue, using a backward masking procedure, here participants were required to report if briefly presented objects (pencils and pens) had previously been assigned to the self or a best friend (i.e., object-ownership task). The results yielded a standard self-ownership effect, such that responses were faster and more accurate to self-owned (vs. friend-owned) objects. In addition, a drift diffusion model analysis indicated that this effect was underpinned by a stimulus bias. Specifically, evidence was accumulated more rapidly from self-owned compared to friend-owned stimuli. These findings further elucidate the extent and origin of self-prioritization during decisional processing.

摘要

尽管有大量研究表明,在刺激评估过程中,与自我相关的材料会被优先处理,但仍存在一些悬而未决的问题。特别是,当刺激在具有挑战性的处理条件下出现时,自我相关性是否有助于任务表现尚不清楚。为了探讨这个问题,这里采用了一种回溯掩蔽程序,要求参与者报告在短暂呈现物体(铅笔和钢笔)之前,这些物体是否被分配给了自己或最好的朋友(即物体所有权任务)。结果产生了一个标准的自我所有权效应,即对自我拥有(相对于朋友拥有)的物体的反应更快、更准确。此外,漂移扩散模型分析表明,这种效应是由刺激偏差支撑的。具体来说,与朋友拥有的刺激相比,从自我拥有的刺激中更快地积累了证据。这些发现进一步阐明了在决策过程中自我优先处理的程度和来源。

相似文献

1
Self-relevance enhances evidence gathering during decision-making.自我相关性增强决策过程中的证据收集。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Sep;209:103122. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103122. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
2
Valence and ownership: object desirability influences self-prioritization.价态和所有权:客体吸引力影响自我优先化。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01235-w. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
Exploring the self-ownership effect: Separating stimulus and response biases.探索自我所有权效应:区分刺激偏差和反应偏差。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Feb;44(2):295-306. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000455. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
4
It's not always about me: The effects of prior beliefs and stimulus prevalence on self-other prioritisation.并非总是以自我为中心:先前信念和刺激出现频率对自我与他人优先排序的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Sep;73(9):1466-1480. doi: 10.1177/1747021820913016. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
5
On stopping yourself: Self-relevance facilitates response inhibition.停止自我:自我相关性促进反应抑制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1416-1423. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02248-7. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
6
Knock yourself out: Brief mindfulness-based meditation eliminates self-prioritization.尽情尝试吧:基于正念的简短冥想能消除自我优先化。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):341-349. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02111-2. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
7
More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.或多或少的我和你:自我相关性增强了项目概率对刺激优先化的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jun;86(4):1145-1164. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01562-x. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
8
Stimulus valence moderates self-learning.刺激效价调节自我学习。
Cogn Emot. 2024 Sep;38(6):884-897. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2331817. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
9
Parts of me: Identity-relevance moderates self-prioritization.自我的一部分:身份相关性调节自我优先化。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Jan;77:102848. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102848. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
10
Learning about me and you: Only deterministic stimulus associations elicit self-prioritization.了解我和你:只有确定性的刺激关联会引发自我优先化。
Conscious Cogn. 2023 Nov;116:103602. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103602. Epub 2023 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital selfie editing shows sex specific associations between processing biases and life satisfaction.数字自拍编辑显示了处理偏差与生活满意度之间的性别特异性关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 24;15(1):14235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99056-y.
2
Adult age differences in the integration of values for self and other.成人在自我与他人价值观整合方面的年龄差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 14;15(1):12776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96656-6.
3
Probing the origins of subjective confidence in source memory decisions in young and older adults: A sequential sampling account.
探究年轻人和老年人源记忆决策中主观信心的起源:一种序列抽样解释。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Mar;154(3):799-828. doi: 10.1037/xge0001680. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
4
Self-prioritization in working memory gating.工作记忆门控中的自我优先级设定
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Feb;87(2):399-414. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02869-8. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
5
Specific Neural Mechanisms of Self-Cognition and the Application of Brainprint Recognition.自我认知的特定神经机制及脑纹识别的应用
Biology (Basel). 2023 Mar 22;12(3):486. doi: 10.3390/biology12030486.
6
Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?实验诱导的自我联想是否会引起情感上的自我优先化?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Jun;76(6):1379-1390. doi: 10.1177/17470218221124928. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
7
Time is of the essence: past selves are not prioritized even when selective discrimination costs are controlled for.时间至关重要:即使控制了选择性歧视的代价,过去的自我也不会被优先考虑。
Psychol Res. 2023 Apr;87(3):768-786. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01702-x. Epub 2022 Jul 8.