Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan City, Taiwan.
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Dec;154:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.016. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
Previous studies on Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) users generally enrolled a heterogeneous population and did not include a control group of histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) users or adjust for confounding variables, such as previous antibiotics. It is uncertain whether hospitalized patients using PPIs for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) are at a higher risk of CDI compared with those using H2RAs. This study aimed to compare the association between CDI and the usage of antisecretory drugs (ASDs): PPIs and H2RAs, for SUP among hospitalized patients, and the impact of the duration of their use on CDI.
In this nationwide population-based cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database, hospitalized patients using ASDs for SUP were identified between 2017 and 2018. A total of 63,266 and 69,269 individuals were included in the PPI and H2RA groups, respectively. The primary endpoint was a 90-day monitoring of CDI occurrence.
The incidences of CDI were 1.6/10,000 and 0.5/10,000 person-days in the PPIs and H2RAs groups, respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, the risk of infection in the PPIs group remained significantly higher than in the H2RAs group (hazard ratio (HR), 2.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.63-3.81). In the subgroup analysis, during hospitalization, the risk of CDI for patients using high-risk antibiotics or admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), as well as patients with immunodeficiency, using PPIs for SUP, was higher than using H2RAs. Furthermore, the risk of CDI was higher in patients using ASDs for durations >14 days than in those using them for <7 days (adjusted HR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.34-5.75).
The risk of occurrence CDI for hospitalized patients using PPIs for SUP was higher than using H2RAs. It is recommended not to exceed 14 days of any gastric ASDs for SUP during hospitalization, especially for patients who have used high-risk antibiotics, have been admitted to the ICU, or have immunodeficiency.
先前关于质子泵抑制剂(PPI)使用者中艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的研究通常纳入了异质人群,并且没有包括组胺 H2 受体拮抗剂(H2RA)使用者的对照组,或调整了混杂变量,如先前使用的抗生素。目前尚不确定接受应激性溃疡预防(SUP)的住院患者使用 PPI 相较于使用 H2RA 发生 CDI 的风险是否更高。本研究旨在比较 CDI 与抗分泌药物(ASD):PPI 和 H2RA 在住院患者中的 SUP 使用之间的关联,并探讨其使用时间对 CDI 的影响。
本研究使用台湾全民健康保险数据库进行了一项全国性的基于人群的队列研究,纳入了 2017 年至 2018 年期间使用 ASD 进行 SUP 的住院患者。共有 63266 名和 69269 名患者分别纳入 PPI 和 H2RA 组。主要终点为 90 天监测 CDI 的发生情况。
PPI 和 H2RA 组的 CDI 发生率分别为 1.6/10000 和 0.5/10000 人日。在调整混杂因素后,PPI 组的感染风险仍然显著高于 H2RA 组(风险比(HR),2.49;95%置信区间(CI),1.63-3.81)。在亚组分析中,在住院期间,使用高危抗生素或入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者,以及免疫功能低下的患者,使用 PPI 进行 SUP 的 CDI 风险高于使用 H2RA。此外,使用 ASD 的持续时间>14 天的患者发生 CDI 的风险高于使用<7 天的患者(校正 HR,3.66;95%CI,2.34-5.75)。
使用 PPI 进行 SUP 的住院患者发生 CDI 的风险高于使用 H2RA。建议在住院期间不要超过 14 天使用任何胃 ASD 进行 SUP,特别是对于使用高危抗生素、入住 ICU 或免疫功能低下的患者。