Goldstein Jeffery A, Nateghi Ramin, Cooper Lee A D
From the Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (Goldstein, Nateghi, Cooper).
the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northwestern University McCormick School of Engineering, Chicago, Illinois (Cooper).
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2025 Jun 1;149(6):503-510. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2024-0274-OA.
CONTEXT.—: Assessment of placental villous maturation is among the most common tasks in perinatal pathology. However, the significance of abnormalities in morphology is unclear and interobserver variability is significant.
OBJECTIVE.—: To develop a machine learning model of placental maturation across the second and third trimesters and quantify the impact of different pathologist-diagnosed abnormalities of villous morphology.
DESIGN.—: Digitize placental villous slides from more than 2500 placentas at 12.0 to 42.6 weeks. Build whole slide learning models to estimate obstetrician-determined gestational age for cases with appropriate maturation and normal morphology. Define the model output as "placental age" and compare it to the chronologic gestational age.
RESULTS.—: Our model showed an r2 of 0.864 and mean absolute error of 1.62 weeks for placentas with appropriate maturation in the test set. Pathologist diagnosis of accelerated maturation was associated with a 2.56-week increase in placental age (±2.91 weeks, P < .001), while delayed maturation was associated with a 0.92-week decrease in placental age (±1.82 weeks, P < .001). Intrauterine fetal demise causes diverse changes to placental age, driven by the nature of the demise. We tested the impact of training a model, using all live births. The resulting r2 was 0.874 and mean absolute error was 1.73 weeks. Furthermore, by including cases with abnormal maturation in the training data, the effect size of accelerated maturation was blunted to only 0.56 ± 2.35 weeks (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS.—: We show that various abnormalities of villous maturation and morphology correlate with abnormalities in placental age. This "no pathologist" model could be useful in situations where pathologists are unavailable or the need for consistency outweighs the utility of expertise.
评估胎盘绒毛成熟度是围产期病理学中最常见的任务之一。然而,形态学异常的意义尚不清楚,且观察者间的差异很大。
建立一个涵盖妊娠中期和晚期的胎盘成熟度机器学习模型,并量化不同病理学家诊断的绒毛形态异常的影响。
将2500多个妊娠12.0至42.6周胎盘的绒毛玻片数字化。建立全玻片学习模型,以估计成熟度适当且形态正常病例的产科确定的孕周。将模型输出定义为“胎盘年龄”,并将其与实际孕周进行比较。
我们的模型在测试集中显示,成熟度适当的胎盘的r2为0.864,平均绝对误差为1.62周。病理学家诊断为成熟加速与胎盘年龄增加2.56周相关(±2.91周,P <.001),而成熟延迟与胎盘年龄减少0.92周相关(±1.82周,P <.001)。宫内胎儿死亡会因死亡性质导致胎盘年龄发生多种变化。我们测试了使用所有活产病例训练模型的影响。得到的r2为0.874,平均绝对误差为1.73周。此外,通过在训练数据中纳入成熟异常的病例,成熟加速的效应大小减弱至仅0.56±2.35周(P <.001)。
我们表明,绒毛成熟度和形态的各种异常与胎盘年龄异常相关。这种“无需病理学家”模型在病理学家无法提供服务或对一致性的需求超过专业知识的效用的情况下可能会有用。