Suppr超能文献

用于脐带中胎儿炎症反应诊断的深度学习

Deep learning for fetal inflammatory response diagnosis in the umbilical cord.

作者信息

Ayad Marina A, Nateghi Ramin, Sharma Abhishek, Chillrud Lawrence, Seesillapachai Tilly, Chou Teresa, Cooper Lee A D, Goldstein Jeffery A

机构信息

Northwestern University, Department of Pathology, Chicago, IL, USA.

Northwestern University, Department of Urology, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Placenta. 2025 Jun 26;167:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2025.04.013. Epub 2025 Apr 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Inflammation of the umbilical cord can be seen as a result of ascending intrauterine infection or other inflammatory stimuli. Acute fetal inflammatory response (FIR) is characterized by infiltration of the umbilical cord by fetal neutrophils, and can be associated with neonatal sepsis or fetal inflammatory response syndrome. Recent advances in deep learning in digital pathology have demonstrated favorable performance across a wide range of clinical tasks, such as diagnosis and prognosis. In this study we classified FIR from whole slide images (WSI).

METHODS

We digitized 4100 histological slides of umbilical cord stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and extracted placental diagnoses from the electronic health record. We build models using attention-based whole slide learning models. We compared strategies between features extracted by a model (ConvNeXtXLarge) pretrained on non-medical images (ImageNet), and one pretrained using histopathology images (UNI). We trained multiple iterations of each model and combined them into an ensemble.

RESULTS

The predictions from the ensemble of models trained using UNI achieved an overall balanced accuracy of 0.836 on the test dataset. In comparison, the ensembled predictions using ConvNeXtXLarge had a lower balanced accuracy of 0.7209. Heatmaps generated from top accuracy model appropriately highlighted arteritis in cases of FIR 2. In FIR 1, the highest performing model assigned high attention to areas of activated-appearing stroma in Wharton's Jelly. However, other high-performing models assigned attention to umbilical vessels.

DISCUSSION

We developed models for diagnosis of FIR from placental histology images, helping reduce interobserver variability among pathologists. Future work may examine the utility of these models for identifying infants at risk of systemic inflammatory response or early onset neonatal sepsis.

摘要

引言

脐带炎症可由宫内感染上行或其他炎症刺激引起。急性胎儿炎症反应(FIR)的特征是胎儿中性粒细胞浸润脐带,并可能与新生儿败血症或胎儿炎症反应综合征相关。数字病理学中深度学习的最新进展在广泛的临床任务(如诊断和预后)中表现出良好的性能。在本研究中,我们从全切片图像(WSI)中对FIR进行分类。

方法

我们将4100张苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色的脐带组织学切片数字化,并从电子健康记录中提取胎盘诊断信息。我们使用基于注意力的全切片学习模型构建模型。我们比较了在非医学图像(ImageNet)上预训练的模型(ConvNeXtXLarge)和使用组织病理学图像预训练的模型(UNI)提取特征的策略。我们对每个模型进行多次迭代训练,并将它们组合成一个集成模型。

结果

使用UNI训练的模型集成在测试数据集上的总体平衡准确率为0.836。相比之下,使用ConvNeXtXLarge的集成预测的平衡准确率较低,为0.7209。从最高准确率模型生成的热图在FIR 2病例中适当突出了动脉炎。在FIR 1中,表现最佳的模型对沃顿胶中出现活化的基质区域给予了高度关注。然而,其他高性能模型则关注脐带血管。

讨论

我们开发了从胎盘组织学图像诊断FIR的模型,有助于减少病理学家之间的观察者间差异。未来的工作可能会研究这些模型在识别有全身炎症反应或早发性新生儿败血症风险的婴儿方面的效用。

相似文献

1
Deep learning for fetal inflammatory response diagnosis in the umbilical cord.
Placenta. 2025 Jun 26;167:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2025.04.013. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
2
Umbilical arteritis and phlebitis mark different stages of the fetal inflammatory response.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;185(2):496-500. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116689.
3
Histopathology of the fetal inflammatory response to intra-amniotic pathogens.
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Aug;25(4):101128. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2020.101128. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
4
Histo-topographic distribution of acute inflammation of the human umbilical cord.
Pathol Int. 2001 Nov;51(11):861-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2001.01284.x.
7
Effect of umbilical ring constriction on Wharton's jelly.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;28(5):692-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.3814.
8
Umbilical cord ulcer: a serious in utero complication of intestinal atresia.
Placenta. 2000 May;21(4):432-5. doi: 10.1053/plac.1999.0480.
9
Splitting of the umbilical cord in a 13-week-old fetus.
Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1):62-4. doi: 10.2350/11-03-1013-CR.1. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
10

引用本文的文献

1
How can artificial intelligence models advance placental biology?
Placenta. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2025.03.010.
2
Benchmarking pathology foundation models for non-neoplastic pathology in the placenta.
medRxiv. 2025 Mar 20:2025.03.19.25324282. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.19.25324282.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-modal contrastive learning for unified placenta analysis using photographs.
Patterns (N Y). 2024 Nov 19;5(12):101097. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.101097. eCollection 2024 Dec 13.
4
A foundation model for clinical-grade computational pathology and rare cancers detection.
Nat Med. 2024 Oct;30(10):2924-2935. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03141-0. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
5
A whole-slide foundation model for digital pathology from real-world data.
Nature. 2024 Jun;630(8015):181-188. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07441-w. Epub 2024 May 22.
8
Towards a general-purpose foundation model for computational pathology.
Nat Med. 2024 Mar;30(3):850-862. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02857-3. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
9
A visual-language foundation model for computational pathology.
Nat Med. 2024 Mar;30(3):863-874. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02856-4. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
10
Tissue Contamination Challenges the Credibility of Machine Learning Models in Real World Digital Pathology.
Mod Pathol. 2024 Mar;37(3):100422. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100422. Epub 2024 Jan 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验