Guyon-Harris Katherine L, Rosas Johana, Dolcini-Catania Luciano, Mendelsohn Alan, Morris Pamela, Gill Anne, Shaw Daniel S
Department Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3414 5th Ave., CHOB 1st Floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Sennott Square, 3rd Floor 210 South Bouquet St, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
J Child Fam Stud. 2023 Jun;32(6):1789-1804. doi: 10.1007/s10826-022-02484-x. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
Infants and toddlers are dependent on supportive and nurturing parenting to promote optimal child development. Assessments of parenting can identify need for parenting intervention, however measures are needed that can predict whether parents reporting challenges will engage in intervention. We validated the Parenting Your Baby (PYB) and Parenting Your Toddler (PYT) parenting measures and examined associations with engagement in parenting intervention. Participants included 403 primary caregivers and their newborns from a multisite longitudinal randomized control trial of the Smart Beginnings (SB) parenting intervention across two urban cities. Caregivers completed the PYB (6 months) and PYT (18 and 24 months) and other self-report measures of parenting and infant and toddler temperament and social-emotional functioning for validation. Observed parenting (6, 18, and 24 months) was coded from observed caregiver-child interactions. Engagement in ongoing intervention (SB) was recorded across infancy and toddlerhood. Factor structure was adequate for the PYB and strong for the PYT. Both measures demonstrated reliability and validity across concurrent and future self-report and observed measures of parenting and caregiver-reported infant and toddler functioning. Parent-reported desire for change in parenting scores on the PYT at 18 months were associated with engagement in parenting intervention 18 through 30 months. The PYB and PYT are reliable and valid measures of the parenting of young children, though more work is needed on the factor structure of the PYB. An important direction for future research is to understand and support engagement in parenting intervention for those who report desire for change but do not engage.
婴幼儿依赖支持性和养育性的育儿方式来促进最佳的儿童发展。对育儿方式的评估可以确定是否需要育儿干预,然而,需要一些措施来预测那些报告有育儿挑战的父母是否会参与干预。我们验证了《养育你的宝宝》(PYB)和《养育你的幼儿》(PYT)这两项育儿评估工具,并研究了它们与参与育儿干预之间的关联。参与者包括来自两个城市的一项关于“明智开端”(SB)育儿干预的多地点纵向随机对照试验中的403名主要照料者及其新生儿。照料者完成了PYB(6个月时)和PYT(18个月和24个月时)以及其他关于育儿、婴幼儿气质和社会情感功能的自我报告评估工具,以进行验证。通过观察照料者与孩子的互动,对观察到的育儿行为(6个月、18个月和24个月时)进行编码。记录了整个婴儿期和幼儿期参与持续干预(SB)的情况。PYB的因子结构足够合理,PYT的因子结构则很强。这两项评估工具在同时期和未来的自我报告以及观察到的育儿行为和照料者报告的婴幼儿功能方面都表现出了可靠性和有效性。照料者在18个月时报告的PYT上育儿得分的改变愿望与18至30个月期间参与育儿干预有关。PYB和PYT是衡量幼儿育儿方式的可靠且有效的评估工具,不过PYB的因子结构还需要进一步研究。未来研究的一个重要方向是了解并支持那些报告有改变愿望但未参与育儿干预的人参与育儿干预。