Suppr超能文献

社会人口学和心理社会因素对 Smart Beginnings Through 6 Months 项目中 VIP 参与率的预测:在早期访问中有效地针对高危产妇。

Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Predictors of VIP Attendance in Smart Beginnings Through 6 Months: Effectively Targeting At-Risk Mothers in Early Visits.

机构信息

New York University, New York, NY, USA.

New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2020 Jan;21(1):120-130. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01044-y.

Abstract

Past research on predictors of participation in early childhood parenting programs suggest that families experiencing higher levels of sociodemographic adversity (e.g., younger maternal age, single parenthood, lower income or education) are less likely to participate in parenting programs. This is significant, as it may indicate that those most in need of additional support are the least likely to receive it. Data from a randomized control trial (RCT) of Smart Beginnings, an integrated, tiered model for school readiness, were used to explore predictors of attendance in Video Interaction Project (VIP) through 6 months. VIP is a primary preventive intervention delivered in tandem with pediatric well-child visits, aimed at reducing income-based disparities in early child development through promotion of responsive parent-child interactions. Using Poisson distribution models (N = 403; treatment arm, n = 201), we find that demographic, socioeconomic status (SES), and psychosocial variables are associated with program attendance but not always in the expected direction. While analyses show that first-time mothers have higher levels of program attendance as expected, we find that less-educated mothers and those with lower parenting self-efficacy have higher levels of attendance as well. The latter findings may imply that the VIP intervention is, by some indicators, effectively targeting families who are more challenging to engage and retain. Implications for pediatric-based interventions with population-level accessibility are discussed.

摘要

过去有关参与幼儿养育计划的预测因素的研究表明,社会人口逆境程度较高的家庭(例如,母亲年龄较小、单亲家庭、收入或教育水平较低)参与养育计划的可能性较低。这很重要,因为这可能表明最需要额外支持的人最不可能得到支持。本研究使用 Smart Beginnings 的随机对照试验 (RCT) 数据,Smart Beginnings 是一种综合的、分层次的入学准备模式,用于探讨通过 6 个月的 Video Interaction Project (VIP) 参与度的预测因素。VIP 是一种与儿科常规就诊同时进行的主要预防干预措施,旨在通过促进响应式亲子互动,减少基于收入的早期儿童发展差距。使用泊松分布模型(N=403;治疗组,n=201),我们发现人口统计学、社会经济地位(SES)和心理社会变量与项目参与度相关,但并不总是按照预期的方向。虽然分析表明,初次当妈妈的人参加项目的比例较高,但我们发现,受教育程度较低的母亲和育儿自我效能感较低的母亲参加项目的比例也较高。后一种发现可能意味着 VIP 干预在某些指标上有效地针对那些更难参与和保留的家庭。讨论了具有人口水平可及性的基于儿科的干预措施的意义。

相似文献

2
Parent engagement and attendance in PEACH™ QLD - an up-scaled parent-led childhood obesity program.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 9;17(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4466-6.
4
Tiered Universal and Targeted Early Childhood Interventions: Enhancing Attendance Across Families with Varying Needs.
Early Child Res Q. 2023;63:362-369. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
5
Onset and persistence of childhood asthma: predictors from infancy.
Pediatrics. 2001 Oct;108(4):E69. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.4.e69.
6
Promotion of Positive Parenting and Prevention of Socioemotional Disparities.
Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20153239. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3239. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
8
Leveraging Healthcare to Promote Responsive Parenting: Impacts of the Video Interaction Project on Parenting Stress.
J Child Fam Stud. 2016 Mar 1;25(3):827-835. doi: 10.1007/s10826-015-0267-7. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Smart Beginnings Predicts Reduced Externalizing Behavior Via Parental Negative Demeanor During Discipline.
J Appl Dev Psychol. 2025 May-Jun;98. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2025.101796. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
Validation of Parenting Your Baby and Parenting Your Toddler and Associations with Engagement in Parenting Intervention.
J Child Fam Stud. 2023 Jun;32(6):1789-1804. doi: 10.1007/s10826-022-02484-x. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
3
5
Supporting responsive parenting in real-world implementation: minimal effective dose of the Video Interaction Project.
Pediatr Res. 2024 Apr;95(5):1295-1300. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02916-4. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
6
Tiered Universal and Targeted Early Childhood Interventions: Enhancing Attendance Across Families with Varying Needs.
Early Child Res Q. 2023;63:362-369. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
8
Promoting Cognitive Stimulation in Parents Across Infancy and Toddlerhood: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
J Pediatr. 2023 Apr;255:159-165.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.11.013. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
9
Collateral benefits from a school-readiness intervention on breastfeeding: A cross-domain impact evaluation.
Matern Child Nutr. 2023 Jan;19(1):e13446. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13446. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
10
Housing Insecurity, Housing Conditions, and Breastfeeding Behaviors for Medicaid-Eligible Families in Urban Settings.
J Hum Lact. 2022 Nov;38(4):760-770. doi: 10.1177/08903344221108073. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

1
The Promise of Prevention Science for Addressing Intergenerational Poverty.
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2018 Feb;24(1):128-143. doi: 10.1037/law0000138. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
2
Enhancing Parent Talk, Reading, and Play in Primary Care: Sustained Impacts of the Video Interaction Project.
J Pediatr. 2018 Aug;199:49-56.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
3
Commentary on Participation in Preventive Interventions.
Prev Sci. 2018 Jul;19(5):685-688. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0887-4.
4
Visit Attendance Patterns in Nurse-Family Partnership Community Sites.
Prev Sci. 2018 May;19(4):516-527. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0829-6.
5
Pre- and postnatal antecedents of a home-visiting intervention and family developmental outcome.
Infant Ment Health J. 2006 Jan;27(1):91-119. doi: 10.1002/imhj.20082.
6
Circle of Security-Parenting: A randomized controlled trial in Head Start.
Dev Psychopathol. 2017 May;29(2):651-673. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417000244.
9
Primary Health Care: Potential Home for Family-Focused Preventive Interventions.
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4 Suppl 2):S106-18. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.014. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验