Li Fangyi, Omar Dev Roxana Dev, Soh Kim Geok, Wang Chen, Yuan Yubin
Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2024 May 21;6(3):100345. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100345. eCollection 2024 Sep.
To perform a systematic review of the effects of Pilates on common body postures.
Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Springer Link, and CNKI. The search year is set from January 1, 2019, to November 15, 2023.
Quasi-experimental studies, randomized controlled trials, randomized clinical trials, and nonrandomized controlled trials investigating the effects of Pilates on body posture.
The Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale was used to evaluate the quality of studies that met the inclusion requirements. Studies were independently assessed by 2 reviewers who read through the full text and labeled as "low quality," "moderate quality," "good quality," and "excellence quality." Disagreements were resolved by the third reviewer. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) tool was used to assess the risk of bias for each study.
Of the 492 studies screened, 13 met the inclusion criteria involving a total of 783 trial participants. Six studies (46%) were of high quality or above, with main limitation related to the internal validity of the study design. The research outcomes focused primarily on effects of Pilates on body posture; cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine; and followed by quality of life and pain.
The findings of this systematic review provided valuable evidence for the role of Pilates in improving body posture problems. Pilates is a boon to patients suffering from postural disorders, and it is suggested that Pilates can be widely used as a complementary therapy. Nonetheless, more detailed studies are necessary in the future.
对普拉提对常见身体姿势的影响进行系统评价。
科学网、PubMed、Scopus、Science Direct、Springer Link和中国知网。检索年份设定为2019年1月1日至2023年11月15日。
调查普拉提对身体姿势影响的准实验研究、随机对照试验、随机临床试验和非随机对照试验。
使用物理治疗证据数据库量表评估符合纳入要求的研究质量。由2名审阅者独立评估研究，他们通读全文并标记为“低质量”“中等质量”“高质量”和“卓越质量”。分歧由第三位审阅者解决。使用Cochrane偏倚风险（RoB 2.0）工具评估每项研究的偏倚风险。
在筛选的492项研究中，13项符合纳入标准，共涉及783名试验参与者。六项研究（46%）为高质量或以上，主要局限性与研究设计的内部效度有关。研究结果主要集中在普拉提对身体姿势、颈椎、胸椎和腰椎的影响，其次是生活质量和疼痛。
本系统评价的结果为普拉提在改善身体姿势问题中的作用提供了有价值的证据。普拉提对患有姿势障碍的患者是一种福音，建议将普拉提广泛用作辅助治疗。尽管如此，未来仍需要更详细的研究。
