Zanardo Moreno, Visser Jacob J, Colarieti Anna, Cuocolo Renato, Klontzas Michail E, Pinto Dos Santos Daniel, Sardanelli Francesco
Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights Imaging. 2024 Oct 7;15(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01801-w.
In order to assess the perceptions and expectations of the radiology staff about artificial intelligence (AI), we conducted an online survey among ESR members (January-March 2024). It was designed considering that conducted in 2018, updated according to recent advancements and emerging topics, consisting of seven questions regarding demographics and professional background and 28 AI questions. Of 28,000 members contacted, 572 (2%) completed the survey. AI impact was predominantly expected on breast and oncologic imaging, primarily involving CT, mammography, and MRI, and in the detection of abnormalities in asymptomatic subjects. About half of responders did not foresee an impact of AI on job opportunities. For 273/572 respondents (48%), AI-only reports would not be accepted by patients; and 242/572 respondents (42%) think that the use of AI systems will not change the relationship between the radiological team and the patient. According to 255/572 respondents (45%), radiologists will take responsibility for any AI output that may influence clinical decision-making. Of 572 respondents, 274 (48%) are currently using AI, 153 (27%) are not, and 145 (25%) are planning to do so. In conclusion, ESR members declare familiarity with AI technologies, as well as recognition of their potential benefits and challenges. Compared to the 2018 survey, the perception of AI's impact on job opportunities is in general slightly less optimistic (more positive from AI users/researchers), while the radiologist's responsibility for AI outputs is confirmed. The use of large language models is declared not only limited to research, highlighting the need for education in AI and its regulations. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study critically evaluates the current impact of AI on radiology, revealing significant usage patterns and clinical implications, thereby guiding future integration strategies to enhance efficiency and patient care in clinical radiology. KEY POINTS: The survey examines ESR member's views about the impact of AI on radiology practice. AI use is relevant in CT and MRI, with varying impacts on job roles. AI tools enhance clinical efficiency but require radiologist oversight for patient acceptance.
为了评估放射科工作人员对人工智能(AI)的看法和期望,我们于2024年1月至3月在欧洲放射学会(ESR)成员中开展了一项在线调查。该调查在参考2018年所做调查的基础上进行设计,并根据最新进展和新出现的主题进行了更新,包括7个关于人口统计学和专业背景的问题以及28个关于人工智能的问题。在联系的28000名成员中,572人(2%)完成了调查。人工智能的影响主要预计体现在乳腺和肿瘤影像学方面,主要涉及CT、乳腺X线摄影和MRI,以及在无症状受试者中检测异常情况。约一半的受访者预计人工智能不会对就业机会产生影响。对于273/572名受访者(48%)而言,仅由人工智能生成的报告患者不会接受;242/572名受访者(42%)认为使用人工智能系统不会改变放射科团队与患者之间的关系。根据255/572名受访者(45%)的看法,放射科医生将对任何可能影响临床决策的人工智能输出结果负责。在572名受访者中,274人(48%)目前正在使用人工智能,153人(27%)未使用,145人(25%)计划使用。总之,ESR成员表示熟悉人工智能技术,同时认识到其潜在的益处和挑战。与2018年的调查相比,对人工智能对就业机会影响的看法总体上略显不那么乐观(人工智能用户/研究人员更为积极),而放射科医生对人工智能输出结果的责任得到了确认。大语言模型的使用不仅限于研究,这凸显了人工智能教育及其监管的必要性。关键相关性声明:本研究批判性地评估了人工智能目前对放射学的影响,揭示了重要的使用模式和临床意义,从而指导未来的整合策略,以提高临床放射学的效率和患者护理质量。关键点:该调查考察了ESR成员对人工智能对放射学实践影响的看法。人工智能在CT和MRI中的应用具有相关性,对工作角色有不同影响。人工智能工具提高了临床效率,但需要放射科医生的监督以获得患者认可。