Suppr超能文献

轻度创伤性脑损伤样本中抑郁焦虑压力量表-21(DASS-21)的拉施分析

Rasch analysis of the depression anxiety stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a mild traumatic brain injury sample.

作者信息

Faulkner Josh W, Snell Deborah L, Siegert R J

机构信息

School of Psychology, Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

Orthopaedic Surgery & Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2025 Jan 28;39(2):136-144. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2411297. Epub 2024 Oct 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 items (DASS-21) in a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) sample.

METHOD

Treatment-seeking adults ( = 347) were recruited from outpatient rehabilitation services in New Zealand. Dimensionality, reliability, person separation index, and differential item functioning (DIF) of the DASS-21 were examined using Rasch analysis.

RESULTS

Initial analysis of the complete 21-item DASS showed poor overall fit due to problems with individual items. Fit to the Rasch model was excellent when treated as three composite scores. The stress subscale demonstrated adequate model fit, dimensionality and good reliability. For anxiety, fit was not good, reliability was unsatisfactory and DIF was evident on one item. When this item was removed, fit to the model was still inadequate as was reliability. DIF was also evident for depression, but when this item was removed, fit to the model was adequate.

CONCLUSION

The DASS-21 is a psychometrically sound measure of distress and stress for adults seeking treatment following mTBI. Ordinal to interval score conversion tables are provided to increase the precision of measurement. When assessing depression in a mTBI population, a 6-item depression subscale is recommended. Caution is advised in using the DASS-21 anxiety subscale alone.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们评估了21项抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS - 21)在轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)样本中的心理测量特性。

方法

从新西兰的门诊康复服务机构招募寻求治疗的成年人(n = 347)。使用Rasch分析检查DASS - 21的维度、信度、人员区分指数和项目功能差异(DIF)。

结果

对完整的21项DASS进行的初步分析显示,由于个别项目存在问题,整体拟合不佳。当作为三个综合分数处理时,与Rasch模型的拟合非常好。压力分量表显示出足够的模型拟合、维度和良好的信度。对于焦虑分量表,拟合不佳,信度不令人满意,且在一个项目上存在明显的DIF。当移除该项目时,与模型的拟合仍然不足,信度也是如此。抑郁分量表也存在明显的DIF,但移除该项目后,与模型的拟合是足够的。

结论

DASS - 21是对mTBI后寻求治疗的成年人的痛苦和压力进行心理测量的可靠工具。提供了顺序量表到区间量表的分数转换表以提高测量精度。在评估mTBI人群的抑郁时,建议使用6项抑郁分量表。单独使用DASS - 21焦虑分量表时需谨慎。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验