Suppr超能文献

Rasch 分析支持使用抑郁、焦虑和压力量表来测量群体的情绪,但不支持测量慢性下背痛个体的情绪。

Rasch analysis supports the use of the depression, anxiety, and stress scales to measure mood in groups but not in individuals with chronic low back pain.

机构信息

Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, PO Box 1165, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;65(2):189-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Chronic pain is a common problem that is associated with mood disorders such as depression. The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21) questionnaire is commonly used to help measure disordered mood. In this study, we used Rasch analysis to analyze the clinimetric properties of the DASS-21 in a chronic low back pain sample.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

A Rasch analysis was conducted on data collected as a part of a randomized hospital-based placebo-controlled trial. DASS-21 questionnaires were completed by the 154 enrolled participants.

RESULTS

The DASS-21 subscales fit the Rasch model. No differential item functioning was detected for age, gender, pain severity, or disability. Reliability for individual use was supported for the depression subscale (Person Separation Index [PSI]=0.86) but group use only for the anxiety (PSI=0.74) and stress (PSI=0.82) subscales. A DASS-21 aggregate score of "negative affect" lacked fit to the Rasch model (χ(2)=191.48, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study that used Rasch analysis to demonstrate that the DASS-21 subscales demonstrate adequate measurement properties for research involving groups with chronic pain. Only the DASS-21 depression subscale demonstrated adequate reliability for use with individuals with chronic pain. The use of a single DASS-21 aggregate score as a measure of "negative affect" was not supported.

摘要

目的

慢性疼痛是一种常见问题,与抑郁等情绪障碍有关。抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21)常用于帮助测量情绪障碍。本研究采用 RASCH 分析方法分析慢性腰痛样本中 DASS-21 的临床计量学特性。

研究设计与设置

对一项基于医院的随机安慰剂对照试验中收集的数据进行 RASCH 分析。154 名入组参与者完成了 DASS-21 问卷。

结果

DASS-21 分量表符合 RASCH 模型。未发现年龄、性别、疼痛严重程度或残疾的差异项目功能。个体使用的可靠性得到支持抑郁分量表(个体分离指数[PSI]=0.86),但焦虑分量表(PSI=0.74)和压力分量表(PSI=0.82)仅支持团体使用。DASS-21“负性情绪”总分不符合 RASCH 模型(χ(2)=191.48,P<0.001)。

结论

这是第一项使用 RASCH 分析来证明 DASS-21 分量表在涉及慢性疼痛人群的研究中具有足够测量特性的研究。只有 DASS-21 抑郁分量表显示出足够的可靠性,适用于慢性疼痛个体。不支持使用单个 DASS-21 总分为“负性情绪”的单一衡量标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验