Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar48. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-01-0012.
Science communication has historically been inequitable, with certain voices and perspectives holding the power and dominant ways of knowing being promoted over others. Recently, there has been a push toward inclusive science communication, which values diverse perspectives and ways of knowing in collaborative conversations to solve complex socioscientific issues. However, there is a lack of both trainings in inclusive science communication for undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students as well as established ways to evaluate the efficacy of these trainings. To address this need, we designed a new multifactorial survey based on the Theory of Planned Behavior to assess students' attitudes/norms, self-efficacy, behavioral intents, and behaviors in inclusive science communication, which we termed the Planned Behaviors in Inclusive Science Communication (PB-ISC) Scale. We utilized expert review, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, cognitive interviews, and quantitative measures to gather evidence of validity supporting the proposed use of the final 4-factor, 26-item survey. This survey can be used as a tool by science communication educators and researchers to assess students' planned behavior in inclusive science communication in response to trainings or experiences in science communication or related topics like socioscientific issues, civic engagement, and citizen science.
科学传播历来存在不平等现象,某些声音和观点拥有权力,占主导地位的认知方式被推广,而其他方式则被忽视。最近,人们一直在推动包容性科学传播,即在协作对话中重视多样化的观点和认知方式,以解决复杂的社会科学问题。然而,对于本科阶段的科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)学生,缺乏包容性科学传播方面的培训,也没有既定的方法来评估这些培训的效果。为了解决这一需求,我们设计了一种新的基于计划行为理论的多因素调查,以评估学生在包容性科学传播中的态度/规范、自我效能、行为意图和行为,我们称之为包容性科学传播中的计划行为(PB-ISC)量表。我们利用专家审查、探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、认知访谈和定量措施来收集证据,支持该最终的 4 因素、26 项调查的提议用途。该调查可作为科学传播教育者和研究人员的工具,用于评估学生在包容性科学传播方面的计划行为,以应对科学传播或相关主题(如社会科学问题、公民参与和公民科学)方面的培训或经验。