Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College, MA.
Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2024 Oct 16;55(4):1025-1038. doi: 10.1044/2024_LSHSS-24-00036. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
The language that school professionals use to describe disabled students can reveal and perpetuate ableist assumptions. Professionals' language choices can also challenge ableist attitudes to help create more inclusive, equitable learning environments. This tutorial seeks to guide speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and other school professionals to identify ableist language, understand the ableist ideologies that such language reveals, and develop strategies to implement ways of communicating with and about disabled students that align with an anti-ableist stance. We offer a brief description of ableism in schools, describe models of disability and their varying alignments toward ableist ideologies, and identify ways in which language can reflect and perpetuate ableism. Using Individualized Education Program goals as an example, we examine the ways in which ableist language can manifest in school practices. Finally, we provide suggestions to guide SLPs and other school professionals to examine and change their language to better align with an anti-ableist stance.
School professionals' language use is not neutral and may reveal and maintain ableist assumptions about disability and disabled students. While dismantling ableism requires systemic change, we suggest that individual professionals can use language in ways that resist ableism and powerfully impact their students' educational experiences.
学校专业人员用来描述残疾学生的语言可能揭示并延续对残疾的成见。专业人员的语言选择也可以挑战对残疾的成见态度,有助于创造更具包容性、公平的学习环境。本教程旨在指导言语语言病理学家(SLP)和其他学校专业人员识别有偏见的语言,理解此类语言所揭示的有偏见的意识形态,并制定策略,以实施与残疾学生沟通和交流的方式,使其与反偏见立场保持一致。我们简要描述了学校中的偏见,描述了残疾模式及其对有偏见意识形态的不同调整,并确定了语言可以反映和延续偏见的方式。我们以个别化教育计划(IEP)目标为例,研究了有偏见的语言在学校实践中表现的方式。最后,我们提供了一些建议,以指导 SLP 和其他学校专业人员检查和改变他们的语言,使其更好地与反偏见立场保持一致。
学校专业人员的语言使用并非中立,可能揭示并维持对残疾和残疾学生的偏见假设。虽然消除偏见需要系统性的改变,但我们认为,个别专业人员可以使用语言来抵制偏见,并对学生的教育体验产生有力影响。