• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习算法的成人心脏手术后院内/30 天死亡率风险预测评分。

A machine learning algorithm-based risk prediction score for in-hospital/30-day mortality after adult cardiac surgery.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK.

National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Oct 1;66(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae368.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezae368
PMID:39374541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11522872/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A study of the performance of in-hospital/30-day mortality risk prediction models using an alternative machine learning algorithm (XGBoost) in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses of prospectively routinely collected data on adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the UK from January 2012 to March 2019. Data were temporally split 70:30 into training and validation subsets. Independent mortality prediction models were created using sequential backward floating selection starting with 61 variables. Assessments of discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the resultant XGBoost model with 23 variables were then conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 224,318 adults underwent cardiac surgery during the study period with a 2.76% (N = 6,100) mortality. In the testing cohort, there was good discrimination (area under the receiver operator curve 0.846, F1 0.277) and calibration (especially in high-risk patients). Decision curve analysis showed XGBoost-23 had a net benefit till a threshold probability of 60%. The most important variables were the type of operation, age, creatinine clearance, urgency of the procedure and the New York Heart Association score.

CONCLUSIONS

Feature-selected XGBoost showed good discrimination, calibration and clinical benefit when predicting mortality post-cardiac surgery. Prospective external validation of a XGBoost-derived model performance is warranted.

摘要

目的

使用替代机器学习算法(XGBoost)研究心脏手术后住院/30 天死亡率风险预测模型的性能。

方法

回顾性分析了 2012 年 1 月至 2019 年 3 月期间在英国接受心脏手术的成年患者的前瞻性常规收集数据。数据按 70:30 的时间分割成训练和验证子集。使用 61 个变量的顺序后向浮动选择开始创建独立的死亡率预测模型。然后对具有 23 个变量的 XGBoost 模型的区分度、校准和临床实用性进行评估。

结果

在研究期间,共有 224318 名成年人接受了心脏手术,死亡率为 2.76%(N=6100)。在测试队列中,该模型具有良好的区分度(接收者操作特征曲线下面积 0.846,F1 0.277)和校准(尤其是在高危患者中)。决策曲线分析显示,XGBoost-23 直到概率阈值为 60%才有净收益。最重要的变量是手术类型、年龄、肌酐清除率、手术的紧急程度和纽约心脏协会评分。

结论

在预测心脏手术后的死亡率时,经过特征选择的 XGBoost 显示出良好的区分度、校准和临床获益。需要对 XGBoost 衍生模型的性能进行前瞻性外部验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf1d/11522872/10975824fa33/ezae368f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf1d/11522872/be2b9d70c6c1/ezae368f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf1d/11522872/95a4f8ad9045/ezae368f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf1d/11522872/9cd268220852/ezae368f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf1d/11522872/10975824fa33/ezae368f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf1d/11522872/be2b9d70c6c1/ezae368f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf1d/11522872/95a4f8ad9045/ezae368f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf1d/11522872/9cd268220852/ezae368f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf1d/11522872/10975824fa33/ezae368f3.jpg

相似文献

1
A machine learning algorithm-based risk prediction score for in-hospital/30-day mortality after adult cardiac surgery.基于机器学习算法的成人心脏手术后院内/30 天死亡率风险预测评分。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Oct 1;66(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae368.
2
Comparison of machine learning techniques in prediction of mortality following cardiac surgery: analysis of over 220 000 patients from a large national database.机器学习技术在心脏手术后死亡率预测中的比较:来自大型国家数据库的 22 万多例患者的分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Jun 1;63(6). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad183.
3
Predictive Utility of a Machine Learning Algorithm in Estimating Mortality Risk in Cardiac Surgery.机器学习算法在心脏手术死亡率预测中的应用价值。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jun;109(6):1811-1819. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.049. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Machine-learning Models Predict 30-Day Mortality, Cardiovascular Complications, and Respiratory Complications After Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.机器学习模型预测无菌翻修全关节置换术后 30 天死亡率、心血管并发症和呼吸系统并发症。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Nov 1;480(11):2137-2145. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002276. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
5
Construction and evaluation of a mortality prediction model for patients with acute kidney injury undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy based on machine learning algorithms.基于机器学习算法的行连续性肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤患者死亡率预测模型的构建与评估。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2388709. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2388709. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
6
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
7
[Construction of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in intensive care unit based on machine learning].基于机器学习构建重症监护病房脓毒症患者院内死亡率预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):696-701. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221219-01104.
8
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: Model Development and Validation Study.基于机器学习的小儿心脏手术后急性肾损伤预测:模型开发与验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 5;25:e41142. doi: 10.2196/41142.
9
Comparing ensemble learning algorithms and severity of illness scoring systems in cardiac intensive care units: a retrospective study.比较心脏重症监护病房中的集成学习算法和疾病严重程度评分系统:一项回顾性研究。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Oct 14;22:eAO0467. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0467. eCollection 2024.
10
Machine Learning to Predict Mortality and Critical Events in a Cohort of Patients With COVID-19 in New York City: Model Development and Validation.机器学习预测纽约市新冠肺炎患者队列中的死亡率和危急事件:模型开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 6;22(11):e24018. doi: 10.2196/24018.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance Drift in Machine Learning Models for Cardiac Surgery Risk Prediction: Retrospective Analysis.用于心脏手术风险预测的机器学习模型中的性能漂移:回顾性分析
JMIRx Med. 2024 Jun 12;5:e45973. doi: 10.2196/45973.
2
Cardiac surgery risk prediction using ensemble machine learning to incorporate legacy risk scores: A benchmarking study.使用集成机器学习纳入传统风险评分进行心脏手术风险预测:一项基准研究。
Digit Health. 2023 Jul 20;9:20552076231187605. doi: 10.1177/20552076231187605. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Comparative analysis of machine learning vs. traditional modeling approaches for predicting in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery: temporal and spatial external validation based on a nationwide cardiac surgery registry.
心脏手术后预测院内死亡率的机器学习与传统建模方法的比较分析:基于全国心脏手术登记处的时间和空间外部验证
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024 Mar 1;10(2):121-131. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad028.
4
Comparison of machine learning techniques in prediction of mortality following cardiac surgery: analysis of over 220 000 patients from a large national database.机器学习技术在心脏手术后死亡率预测中的比较:来自大型国家数据库的 22 万多例患者的分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Jun 1;63(6). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad183.
5
Prediction of operative mortality for patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures without established risk scores.预测未建立风险评分的心脏手术患者的手术死亡率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Apr;165(4):1449-1459.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
6
Decade-long trends in surgery for acute Type A aortic dissection in England: A retrospective cohort study.英格兰急性A型主动脉夹层手术的十年趋势:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Jun 5;7:100131. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100131. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2017年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.
8
Reliability of new scores in predicting perioperative mortality after isolated aortic valve surgery: a comparison with the society of thoracic surgeons score and logistic EuroSCORE.新型评分系统预测孤立主动脉瓣手术围术期死亡率的可靠性:与胸外科医师学会评分和 logistic EuroSCORE 的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 May;95(5):1539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.058. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
9
Performance of the EuroSCORE models in emergency cardiac surgery.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)模型在急诊心脏手术中的表现。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Mar 1;6(2):178-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000018. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
10
A systematic review of risk prediction in adult cardiac surgery: considerations for future model development.成人心脏手术风险预测的系统评价:对未来模型发展的考虑。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):e121-9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt044. Epub 2013 Feb 19.