University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Department of Public Health, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Oct 7;9(10):e013740. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013740.
Return-of-service (RoS) schemes are investment strategies that governments use to increase the pool of health professionals through the issuing of bursaries and scholarships to health sciences students in return for service after graduation. Despite using these schemes for many years, Eswatini, South Africa, Botswana and Lesotho have not assessed the costs and return on investment of these schemes. This study aimed to assess the costs and relative rates of contract defaulting in these four Southern African countries.
A retrospective cohort study was carried out by reviewing databases of RoS beneficiaries for selected health sciences programmes who were funded between 2000 and 2010. Costs of the schemes were assessed by country, degree type and whether bursary holders completed their required service or defaulted on their public service obligations.
Of the 5616 beneficiaries who studied between 1995 and 2019 in the four countries, 1225 (21.8%) beneficiaries from 2/9 South African provinces and Eswatini were presented in the final analysis. Only Eswatini had data on debt recovery or financial repayments. Beneficiaries were mostly medical students and slightly biased towards males. Medical students benefited from 56.7% and 81.3% of the disbursement in Eswatini (US$2 million) and South Africa (US$57 million), respectively. Each South African medical student studying in Cuba cost more than five times the rate of medical students who studied in South Africa. Of the total expenditure, 47.7% and 39.3% of the total disbursement is spent on individuals who default the RoS scheme in South Africa and Eswatini, respectively.
RoS schemes in these countries have loss of return on investment due to poor monitoring. The schemes are costly, ineffective and have never been evaluated. There are poor mechanisms for identifying beneficiaries who exit their contracts prematurely and inadequate debt recovery processes.
回报服务(RoS)计划是政府通过向卫生科学专业学生发放助学金和奖学金来增加卫生专业人员数量的投资策略,以换取毕业后的服务。尽管这些计划已经实施了多年,但斯威士兰、南非、博茨瓦纳和莱索托尚未评估这些计划的成本和投资回报。本研究旨在评估这四个南部非洲国家的这些计划的成本和相对违约率。
通过审查 2000 年至 2010 年期间资助的选定卫生科学计划的 RoS 受益人的数据库,进行了回顾性队列研究。按国家、学位类型以及助学金获得者是否完成规定的服务或违反公共服务义务来评估计划的成本。
在四个国家的 1995 年至 2019 年期间学习的 5616 名受益人中,有 1225 名(21.8%)来自南非的 2/9 个省份和斯威士兰的受益人参最后的分析。只有斯威士兰有关于债务收回或财务还款的数据。受益人大都是医学生,略偏向男性。医学生受益于斯威士兰(约 200 万美元)和南非(约 5700 万美元)的支出分别为 56.7%和 81.3%。在古巴学习的南非医学生的费用是在南非学习的医学生的五倍以上。在总支出中,南非和斯威士兰分别有 47.7%和 39.3%的支出用于违约 RoS 计划的个人。
这些国家的 RoS 计划由于监测不力而导致投资回报损失。这些计划成本高、效率低,从未得到评估。用于识别提前退出合同的受益人的机制不佳,债务回收过程也不足。