Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
J Rural Health. 2022 Sep;38(4):689-695. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12664. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
While rates of family caregiving and paid caregiving are increasing, how often they occur together ("shared care") and whether utilization varies geographically are unknown. We examined differences in family and paid caregiving utilization by rurality and region in the United States.
The 2020 Cornell National Social Survey is an annual cross-sectional telephone-based survey of a random sample of 1,000 US adults. Participants were asked if they have been a family caregiver, including if they provided care alongside a paid caregiver. Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes and Census areas classified rurality and region. The association between residence and the prevalence of caregiving was determined with multivariable Poisson regression.
Among 857 participants with geographic and caregiving data, 11.8% (n = 101) were rural dwellers and 34.2% were family caregivers. Rural residence (vs urban) was associated with a higher prevalence of family caregiving (PR: 1.59 [1.22, 2.06]), and Western residence (vs Northeast) was associated with a lower prevalence of family caregiving (PR: 0.63 [0.46, 0.87], P = .01). Forty percent of family caregivers shared care with a paid caregiver. There was no significant difference in shared care by rural residence in unadjusted (31.8% rural vs 43.1% urban, P = .22) or adjusted models (PR: 0.85 [0.51, 1.41], P = .53).
Although family caregiving was more prevalent in rural areas and certain regions, shared care did not differ by rurality or region. Studies are needed to understand why rural residents do more family caregiving without additional support from paid caregivers, and what the implications are for caregivers and care recipients.
尽管家庭护理和付费护理的比例正在上升,但它们同时发生的频率(“共同护理”)以及它们在地理上的利用情况尚不清楚。我们研究了美国农村和地区差异对家庭和付费护理利用的影响。
2020 年康奈尔国家社会调查是一项年度横断面电话调查,对 1000 名美国成年人进行了随机抽样。参与者被问及他们是否曾经是家庭护理人员,包括他们是否与付费护理人员一起提供护理。农村-城市通勤区代码和人口普查区将农村和地区进行了分类。使用多变量泊松回归确定居住与护理患病率之间的关联。
在 857 名具有地理和护理数据的参与者中,11.8%(n=101)为农村居民,34.2%为家庭护理人员。与城市相比,农村居住(vs 城市)与家庭护理的高患病率相关(PR:1.59[1.22,2.06]),而西部居住(vs 东北部)与家庭护理的低患病率相关(PR:0.63[0.46,0.87],P=0.01)。40%的家庭护理人员与付费护理人员共同护理。在未经调整(农村 31.8%vs 城市 43.1%,P=0.22)或调整模型(PR:0.85[0.51,1.41],P=0.53)中,农村居住对共同护理没有显著差异。
尽管家庭护理在农村地区和某些地区更为普遍,但共同护理并未因农村或地区而异。需要研究为什么农村居民在没有额外付费护理人员支持的情况下进行更多的家庭护理,以及这对护理人员和护理接受者意味着什么。