• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Rural-urban differences in family and paid caregiving utilization in the United States: Findings from the Cornell National Social Survey.美国城乡家庭和有偿护理利用的差异:康奈尔国家社会调查的结果。
J Rural Health. 2022 Sep;38(4):689-695. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12664. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
2
Rural-urban and regional variations in aspects of caregiving, support services and caregiver health in the USA: evidence from a national survey.美国在照顾、支持服务和照顾者健康方面的城乡和地区差异:来自全国调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 7;14(10):e081581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081581.
3
Rural-Urban Difference in Workplace Supports and Impacts for Employed Caregivers.城乡就业护工工作场所支持和影响的差异。
J Rural Health. 2019 Jan;35(1):49-57. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12309. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
4
Caregiving burden of informal caregivers of older adults with advanced cancer: The effects of rurality and education.老年人晚期癌症患者非正规照护者的照护负担:农村和教育的影响。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 Sep;12(7):1015-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
5
Place-based, intersectional variation in caregiving patterns and health outcomes among informal caregivers in the United States.美国非正规照护者的照护模式和健康结果存在基于地点的、交叉性的差异。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 19;12:1423457. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1423457. eCollection 2024.
6
The relationship between geographical and social space and approaches to care among rural and urban caregivers caring for a family member with Dementia: a qualitative study.农村和城市照护者在照顾痴呆症家庭成员方面的地理和社会空间关系及照护方法:一项定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2017 Dec;12(1):1275107. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2016.1275107. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
7
Financial and Health Barriers and Caregiving-Related Difficulties Among Rural and Urban Caregivers.农村和城市照料者的经济和健康障碍以及与照料相关的困难。
J Rural Health. 2018 Jun;34(3):263-274. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12273. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
8
Rural and Urban Differences in Passenger-Vehicle-Occupant Deaths and Seat Belt Use Among Adults - United States, 2014.2014年美国城乡成年乘用车乘客死亡及安全带使用情况差异
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Sep 22;66(17):1-13. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6617a1.
9
Family caregivers' assessments of caring for a relative with dementia: a comparison of urban and rural areas.家庭照顾者对照顾痴呆亲属的评估:城乡比较
Int J Older People Nurs. 2015 Mar;10(1):27-37. doi: 10.1111/opn.12044. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
10
Comparing the experiences of rural and urban family caregivers of the terminally ill.比较农村和城市临终患者家庭照料者的经历。
Rural Remote Health. 2013 Jan-Mar;13(1):2250. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Geographic disparities in unpaid caregiving.无偿照护中的地域差异。
J Rural Health. 2025 Mar;41(2):e70039. doi: 10.1111/jrh.70039.
2
Rural-urban and regional variations in aspects of caregiving, support services and caregiver health in the USA: evidence from a national survey.美国在照顾、支持服务和照顾者健康方面的城乡和地区差异:来自全国调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 7;14(10):e081581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081581.
3
Reimagining A Caregiver-friendly Society.重塑一个关爱照顾者的社会。
J Appalach Health. 2023 Dec 1;5(3):1-8. doi: 10.13023/jah.0503.01. eCollection 2023.
4
Healthcare use and out-of-pocket costs for rural family caregivers and care recipients in a randomized controlled trial.一项随机对照试验中农村家庭护理人员及护理对象的医疗保健使用情况和自付费用
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Aug;72(8):2523-2531. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18934. Epub 2024 May 2.
5
Who Will Care for Rural Older Adults? Measuring the Direct Care Workforce in Rural Areas.谁来照顾农村的老年人?衡量农村地区的直接护理人员数量。
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Aug;42(8):1800-1808. doi: 10.1177/07334648231158482. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
6
Essential but Excluded: Building Disaster Preparedness Capacity for Home Health Care Workers and Home Care Agencies.不可或缺但被忽视:为家庭保健医护人员和家庭保健机构构建备灾能力。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Dec;23(12):1990-1996. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.09.012. Epub 2022 Nov 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Utilization, Contributions, and Perceptions of Paid Home Care Workers Among Households in New York State.纽约州家庭中带薪家庭护理工作者的使用情况、贡献及认知
Innov Aging. 2022 Jan 6;6(2):igac001. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac001. eCollection 2022.
2
Rural-urban differences in informal caregiving and health-related quality of life.城乡地区在非正式照护及健康相关生活质量方面的差异。
J Rural Health. 2022 Mar;38(2):442-456. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12581. Epub 2021 May 6.
3
Family Caregiver Perspectives on Benefits and Challenges of Caring for Older Adults With Paid Caregivers.家庭护工对有付费护工的老年照护者的益处和挑战的看法。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Dec;40(12):1778-1785. doi: 10.1177/0733464820959559. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
4
Home Health Care Use and Post-Discharge Outcomes After Heart Failure Hospitalizations.家庭医疗保健的使用与心力衰竭住院后的出院结果。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;8(12):1038-1049. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
Informal And Formal Home Care For Older Adults With Disabilities Increased, 2004-16.2004-2016 年,有残疾的老年人的非正式和正式家庭护理增加。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Aug;39(8):1297-1301. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01800.
6
Sharing the Care-A Patient and Her Caregivers.共同护理——一位患者及其护理人员
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1617-1618. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4231.
7
Beyond Functional Support: The Range Of Health-Related Tasks Performed In The Home By Paid Caregivers In New York.超越功能支持:纽约付费护工在家中完成的与健康相关的一系列任务。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jun;38(6):927-933. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00004.
8
Concordance of Rural-Urban Self-identity and ZIP Code-Derived Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) Designation.农村-城市身份认同与邮政编码衍生的农村-城市通勤区(RUCA)指定的一致性。
J Rural Health. 2020 Mar;36(2):274-280. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12364. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
9
Rural-Urban Disparities in Access to Home- and Community-Based Services and Supports: Stakeholder Perspectives From 14 States.农村-城市地区在获得家庭和社区服务与支持方面的差距:来自 14 个州的利益相关者观点。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Apr;20(4):503-508.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.120. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
10
Utilization of Formal and Informal Home Care: How Do Older Canadians' Experiences Vary by Care Arrangements?正式和非正式家庭护理的使用情况:加拿大老年人的经历如何因护理安排而异?
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Feb;39(2):129-140. doi: 10.1177/0733464817750274. Epub 2018 Jan 1.

美国城乡家庭和有偿护理利用的差异:康奈尔国家社会调查的结果。

Rural-urban differences in family and paid caregiving utilization in the United States: Findings from the Cornell National Social Survey.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Rural Health. 2022 Sep;38(4):689-695. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12664. Epub 2022 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1111/jrh.12664
PMID:35355330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9492623/
Abstract

PURPOSE

While rates of family caregiving and paid caregiving are increasing, how often they occur together ("shared care") and whether utilization varies geographically are unknown. We examined differences in family and paid caregiving utilization by rurality and region in the United States.

METHODS

The 2020 Cornell National Social Survey is an annual cross-sectional telephone-based survey of a random sample of 1,000 US adults. Participants were asked if they have been a family caregiver, including if they provided care alongside a paid caregiver. Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes and Census areas classified rurality and region. The association between residence and the prevalence of caregiving was determined with multivariable Poisson regression.

FINDINGS

Among 857 participants with geographic and caregiving data, 11.8% (n = 101) were rural dwellers and 34.2% were family caregivers. Rural residence (vs urban) was associated with a higher prevalence of family caregiving (PR: 1.59 [1.22, 2.06]), and Western residence (vs Northeast) was associated with a lower prevalence of family caregiving (PR: 0.63 [0.46, 0.87], P = .01). Forty percent of family caregivers shared care with a paid caregiver. There was no significant difference in shared care by rural residence in unadjusted (31.8% rural vs 43.1% urban, P = .22) or adjusted models (PR: 0.85 [0.51, 1.41], P = .53).

CONCLUSIONS

Although family caregiving was more prevalent in rural areas and certain regions, shared care did not differ by rurality or region. Studies are needed to understand why rural residents do more family caregiving without additional support from paid caregivers, and what the implications are for caregivers and care recipients.

摘要

目的

尽管家庭护理和付费护理的比例正在上升,但它们同时发生的频率(“共同护理”)以及它们在地理上的利用情况尚不清楚。我们研究了美国农村和地区差异对家庭和付费护理利用的影响。

方法

2020 年康奈尔国家社会调查是一项年度横断面电话调查,对 1000 名美国成年人进行了随机抽样。参与者被问及他们是否曾经是家庭护理人员,包括他们是否与付费护理人员一起提供护理。农村-城市通勤区代码和人口普查区将农村和地区进行了分类。使用多变量泊松回归确定居住与护理患病率之间的关联。

发现

在 857 名具有地理和护理数据的参与者中,11.8%(n=101)为农村居民,34.2%为家庭护理人员。与城市相比,农村居住(vs 城市)与家庭护理的高患病率相关(PR:1.59[1.22,2.06]),而西部居住(vs 东北部)与家庭护理的低患病率相关(PR:0.63[0.46,0.87],P=0.01)。40%的家庭护理人员与付费护理人员共同护理。在未经调整(农村 31.8%vs 城市 43.1%,P=0.22)或调整模型(PR:0.85[0.51,1.41],P=0.53)中,农村居住对共同护理没有显著差异。

结论

尽管家庭护理在农村地区和某些地区更为普遍,但共同护理并未因农村或地区而异。需要研究为什么农村居民在没有额外付费护理人员支持的情况下进行更多的家庭护理,以及这对护理人员和护理接受者意味着什么。