Blauvelt Andrew, Kallender Howard, Sturm Daniel, Li Qian, Ren Haobo, Eichenfield Lawrence F
Oregon Medical Research Center, Portland, OR, USA.
Blauvelt Consulting, LLC, 17700 Upper Cherry Lane, Lake Oswego, OR, 97034, USA.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;14(11):3161-3174. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01272-3. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
For some patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), topical corticosteroids (TCS), topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI), and systemic therapies are inadequate to control disease or are associated with adverse events (AEs). Ruxolitinib cream monotherapy demonstrated anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic effects among patients enrolled in two pivotal phase 3 studies (TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2); most patients had long-term disease control with as-needed use during the 44-week long-term safety (LTS) period. This post hoc analysis explored efficacy and safety of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream by previous medication use.
Patients aged ≥ 12 years enrolled in TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2 were randomized 2:2:1 to twice-daily 0.75% or 1.5% ruxolitinib cream or vehicle cream for 8 weeks, followed by a 44-week LTS period; patients initially on vehicle were re-randomized 1:1 to either ruxolitinib cream strength.
Within 12 months of enrollment (N = 1249), previous AD therapies were used by 89.4% of efficacy-evaluable patients applying vehicle or ruxolitinib cream (n = 725); of these, 80.4% received TCS (n = 583), 22.2% TCI (n = 161), 20.3% TCS + TCI (n = 147), and 18.9% systemic therapies (n = 137). Across previous medication subgroups, achievement of Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)-treatment success (IGA 0/1 with ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline), ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index from baseline, and ≥ 4-point improvement in Itch numerical rating scale score from baseline at Week 8 did not substantially differ among patients who applied ruxolitinib cream. Outcomes were similar to those in the overall study population. At all study visits during the LTS period, > 70% of patients in each subgroup had IGA 0/1 and a low percentage (generally < 3%) of affected body surface area. Treatment-related AEs across subgroups were reported in 7.3% (n = 35/481) to 17.4% (n = 19/109) of patients.
Continuous-use ruxolitinib cream monotherapy for 8 weeks followed by as-needed use was effective and well tolerated, regardless of previous topical or systemic therapy, with outcomes similar to those achieved in the overall study population.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03745638/NCT03745651.
对于一些特应性皮炎(AD)患者,外用糖皮质激素(TCS)、外用钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(TCI)和全身治疗不足以控制病情或会引发不良事件(AE)。鲁索替尼乳膏单药治疗在两项关键的3期研究(TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2)中显示出抗炎和止痒作用;在44周的长期安全性(LTS)期间,大多数患者通过按需使用实现了长期疾病控制。这项事后分析探讨了根据既往用药情况使用1.5%鲁索替尼乳膏的疗效和安全性。
年龄≥12岁且参与TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2的患者按2:2:1随机分配,分别每日两次使用0.75%或1.5%鲁索替尼乳膏或赋形剂乳膏,为期8周,随后进入44周的LTS期;最初使用赋形剂的患者按1:1重新随机分配至任一鲁索替尼乳膏强度组。
在入组的12个月内(N = 1249),89.4%使用赋形剂或鲁索替尼乳膏的疗效可评估患者(n = 725)曾接受过AD治疗;其中,80.4%接受过TCS(n = 583),22.2%接受过TCI(n = 161),20.3%接受过TCS + TCI(n = 147),18.9%接受过全身治疗(n = 137)。在既往用药亚组中,使用鲁索替尼乳膏的患者在第8周时达到研究者整体评估(IGA)治疗成功(IGA 0/1且较基线改善≥2级)、湿疹面积和严重程度指数较基线改善≥75%以及瘙痒数字评定量表评分较基线改善≥4分的情况并无显著差异。结果与总体研究人群相似。在LTS期的所有研究访视中,各亚组中>70%的患者IGA为0/1,且受累体表面积百分比低(通常<3%)。各亚组中报告的治疗相关AE患者比例为7.3%(n = 35/481)至17.4%(n = 19/109)。
连续使用鲁索替尼乳膏单药治疗8周后按需使用有效且耐受性良好,无论既往使用过外用或全身治疗,其结果与总体研究人群相似。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符,NCT03745638/NCT03745651。