• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人牙龈成纤维细胞对氧化锆和钛种植体基台的反应:一项系统评价。

Human gingival fibroblast response on zirconia and titanium implant abutment: A systematic review.

作者信息

Rattanapitak Ratanatip, Thong-Ngarm Weeranuch

机构信息

Division of Crowns and Bridges, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2024 Oct 7. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13962.

DOI:10.1111/jopr.13962
PMID:39375915
Abstract

PURPOSE

The peri-implant region, where restoration interfaces with mucosal tissue, plays an essential role in overall implant success and is just as important as osseointegration. The implant abutment materials are in intimate contact with human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs). This study compares the proliferation of HGFs between zirconia and titanium abutments used in dental implants.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. English articles based on in vitro studies testing HGFs proliferation on zirconia and titanium implant abutment materials were included. A quality assessment of the selected study was performed using the web-based Science in Risk Assessment and Policy (SciRAP) tool. The HGFs proliferation and cellular morphology tests on zirconia and titanium materials from the included studies were summarized, exploring the role of material surface characteristics.

RESULTS

The electronic search yielded 401 studies, of which 17 were selected for inclusion. Zirconia exhibited comparable or superior efficacy in promoting the proliferation of HGFs compared to titanium. Observations on cellular morphology showed similar outcomes for both materials. Establishing a definitive relationship between contact angle, surface roughness, and their influence on cellular response remains challenging due to the varied methodological approaches in the reviewed studies.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of this systematic review, zirconia shows comparable reliability to titanium as an abutment material for HGFs proliferation, with comparable or superior HGFs proliferative outcomes.

摘要

目的

种植体周围区域是修复体与黏膜组织的界面,对种植体整体成功起着至关重要的作用,与骨结合同样重要。种植体基台材料与人类牙龈成纤维细胞(HGFs)密切接触。本研究比较了牙科种植体中氧化锆基台和钛基台对HGFs增殖的影响。

方法

使用PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science数据库进行电子检索。纳入基于体外研究测试氧化锆和钛种植体基台材料上HGFs增殖的英文文章。使用基于网络的风险评估与政策科学(SciRAP)工具对所选研究进行质量评估。总结纳入研究中氧化锆和钛材料上的HGFs增殖及细胞形态学测试,探讨材料表面特性的作用。

结果

电子检索得到401项研究,其中17项被选入。与钛相比,氧化锆在促进HGFs增殖方面表现出相当或更好的效果。细胞形态学观察显示两种材料的结果相似。由于综述研究中的方法不同,确定接触角、表面粗糙度及其对细胞反应的影响之间的确切关系仍然具有挑战性。

结论

基于本系统评价的结果,氧化锆作为一种用于HGFs增殖的基台材料,显示出与钛相当的可靠性,且具有相当或更好的HGFs增殖结果。

相似文献

1
Human gingival fibroblast response on zirconia and titanium implant abutment: A systematic review.人牙龈成纤维细胞对氧化锆和钛种植体基台的反应:一项系统评价。
J Prosthodont. 2024 Oct 7. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13962.
2
Mechanical behavior of titanium and zirconia abutments at the implant-abutment interface: A systematic review.钛和氧化锆基台在种植体-基台界面的力学行为:系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Mar;131(3):420-426. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
3
Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review.氧化锆作为牙科种植体基台材料:系统评价。
Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Jul-Aug;23(4):299-309.
4
The effect of zirconia or titanium as abutment material on soft peri-implant tissues: a systematic review and meta-analysis.氧化锆或钛作为基台材料对种植体周围软组织的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 11:139-47. doi: 10.1111/clr.12631. Epub 2015 Jun 13.
5
Are Zirconia Implant Abutments Safe and Predictable in Posterior Regions? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.氧化锆种植体基台在后牙区应用的安全性和预测性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):233-44. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4349.
6
Titanium-Zirconia abutment-implant assemblies: Are they alternatives for single material implants?钛锆基台-种植体组件:它们是单一材料种植体的替代品吗?
Dent Mater. 2025 Aug;41(8):914-925. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2025.05.007. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
7
Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.疲劳测试后种植体基台的断裂强度:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Sep;62:333-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 14.
8
Mechanical behavior of hybrid custom implant abutments with various crown materials: a 3D finite element analysis.不同冠材料的混合定制种植体基台的力学行为:三维有限元分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 5;25(1):1106. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06445-w.
9
Comparison of the effect of zirconia and titanium abutments on peri-implant hard and soft tissues.氧化锆和钛基台对种植体周围软硬组织影响的比较。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2024 Jan 1;24(1):69-75. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_201_23. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
10
Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review.陶瓷植入物是钛植入物的可行替代方案吗?一项系统的文献综述。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:32-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01785.x.