Guevara Raúl David, López-Vergé Sergi, Pastor Jose J, Manteca Xavier, Tedo Gemma, Llonch Pol
AWEC Advisors S.L., Animal Welfare Education Centre (AWEC), Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Department of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Sep 23;11:1433628. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1433628. eCollection 2024.
Regrouping practices are frequent in pig production, altering hierarchy and triggering aggressive behaviors. The present study aimed to investigate the physiological responses of piglets to an experimental model designed to induce stress through systematic social mixing in two trials. In Trial A, a total of 144 crossbred piglets (25 days postweaning) housed in one room within 36 pens (four piglets/pen) were used and randomly assigned to either a control group (piglets maintained in their pen, Ctrl-A) or a social challenge group (piglets mixed, SC-A). In Trial B, the same number of animals (33 days postweaning) and crossbreed line was used, and each piglet was assigned either to a control group (Ctrl-B) or a social challenge group (SC-B) in two independent rooms (rooms Ctrl and SC, 12 pens/ room, six piglets/pen). The social challenge consisted of daily moves of three out of four pen mates and five out of six pen mates, for Trials A and B, respectively. In the Ctrl groups, all piglets stayed in their original pen. Before the 1st mixing day and at the end of the 3rd mixing day, saliva (cortisol concentration) and blood (cortisol concentration changes, hemogram, and immunologic activation) samples were collected from two random piglets per pen. Skin lesion scores of all piglets were also recorded on the front, middle, and rear body regions. In Trial A, the total skin lesions score was higher in the SC-A group compared to the Ctrl-A group after the social challenge (0.53 vs. 0.17; < 0.05), but an unexpected increase between sampling days in the Ctrl-A piglets (0.06 vs. 0.17; p < 0.05) was also recorded, suggesting that Ctrl-A pigs showed similar aggressivity levels to the SC-A group. Hematological parameters hemoglobin, red blood cell counts, and leukocyte counts present similar changes in both treatment groups after the social challenge. Contrarily, in Trial B, the lesion score only increased in the piglets in room SC (0.08 vs. 0.34; < 0.05). Results suggest that stable groups may show aggressive behaviors if they are in the same room with socially challenged pigs. Thus, the physical separation of treatment groups in social stress studies is recommended.
在养猪生产中,重新分组的做法很常见,这会改变等级制度并引发攻击行为。本研究旨在通过两项试验,研究仔猪对一种旨在通过系统性社会混合诱导应激的实验模型的生理反应。在试验A中,总共144头杂交仔猪(断奶后25天)被安置在一个房间内的36个围栏中(每个围栏4头仔猪),并随机分配到对照组(仔猪留在原围栏中,Ctrl-A)或社会挑战组(仔猪混合,SC-A)。在试验B中,使用了相同数量的动物(断奶后33天)和杂交品系,每头仔猪被分配到两个独立房间(Ctrl和SC房间,每个房间12个围栏,每个围栏6头仔猪)中的对照组(Ctrl-B)或社会挑战组(SC-B)。社会挑战包括在试验A和试验B中,分别每天移动四分之三的同围栏伙伴和六分之五的同围栏伙伴。在对照组中,所有仔猪都留在原围栏中。在第一次混合日之前和第三次混合日结束时,从每个围栏中随机选取的两头仔猪采集唾液(皮质醇浓度)和血液(皮质醇浓度变化、血常规和免疫激活)样本。还记录了所有仔猪身体前部、中部和后部区域的皮肤损伤评分。在试验A中,社会挑战后,SC-A组的总皮肤损伤评分高于Ctrl-A组(0.53对0.17;<0.05),但也记录到Ctrl-A组仔猪在采样日之间意外增加(0.06对0.17;p<0.05),这表明Ctrl-A组仔猪的攻击性水平与SC-A组相似。社会挑战后,两个治疗组的血液学参数血红蛋白、红细胞计数和白细胞计数呈现相似变化。相反,在试验B中,只有SC房间的仔猪的损伤评分增加(0.08对0.34;<0.05)。结果表明,如果稳定组与受到社会挑战的猪在同一房间,它们可能会表现出攻击行为。因此,建议在社会应激研究中对治疗组进行物理隔离。