Suppr超能文献

西班牙语版认知灵活性量表(CFS)的效度与内部一致性

Validity and Internal Consistency of a Spanish Version of the Cognitive Flexibil ity Scale (CFS).

作者信息

López Mariana Beatriz, Arán Filippetti Vanessa, Krumm Gabriela Liliana

机构信息

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos AiresC1425FQB, República Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Buenos Aires República Argentina.

Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud y del Compor tamiento (CIICSAC) de la Universidad Adventista del Plata (UAP), Libertador San Martin, E3103XAF, Entre Ríos, República Argentina. Universidad Adventista del Plata Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud y del Compor tamiento (CIICSAC) Universidad Adventista del Plata (UAP) Entre Ríos Argentina.

出版信息

Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2024 Jun 12;17(1):53-62. doi: 10.21500/20112084.6106. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study presents a Spanish version of the Cognitive Flexi bility Scale (CFS), a subjective and brief instrument to measure Cognitive Flexibility (CF), and analyzes its psychometric characteristics.

METHOD

The items of the scale's original version were adapted to Spanish. An interview containing the adapted version of the CFS, the Adult Executive Functioning Inventory (ADEXI), the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), and sociodemographic data, was administered to an intentional sample of 369 Argentine adults, aged between 18 and 60, through an online platform.

RESULTS

The CFS's internal consistency was high (813). A two-factor model, Strengths and Difficulties in CF, showed the best fit for the data. The CFS shows a negative correlation with the executive deficit and a positive correlations with empathy dimensions.

DISCUSSION

The Spanish-adapted version of the CFS shows satisfactory psychometric properties in the Argentine adult population.

摘要

目的

本研究呈现了认知灵活性量表(CFS)的西班牙语版本,这是一种用于测量认知灵活性(CF)的主观且简短的工具,并分析其心理测量特征。

方法

该量表原始版本的项目被改编为西班牙语。通过在线平台,对369名年龄在18至60岁之间的阿根廷成年人的有意样本进行了一次访谈,访谈内容包括CFS的改编版本、成人执行功能量表(ADEXI)、人际反应指数(IRI)以及社会人口统计学数据。

结果

CFS的内部一致性较高(813)。一个双因素模型,即CF中的优势与困难,显示出对数据的最佳拟合。CFS与执行功能缺陷呈负相关,与共情维度呈正相关。

讨论

CFS的西班牙语改编版本在阿根廷成年人群体中显示出令人满意的心理测量特性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/698c/11456331/0749cc8c6f78/2011-2084-ijpr-17-01-53-gf1.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity and Internal Consistency of a Spanish Version of the Cognitive Flexibil ity Scale (CFS).
Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2024 Jun 12;17(1):53-62. doi: 10.21500/20112084.6106. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
2
Adult Executive Functioning Inventory (ADEXI): Factor structure, convergent validity, and reliability of a Spanish adaptation.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Nov-Dec;29(6):1380-1386. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1880408. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
3
Development and validation of the Japanese version of cognitive flexibility scale.
BMC Res Notes. 2016 May 17;9:275. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2070-y.
5
Validation of a Modified Version of Interpersonal Reactivity Index for Medical Students Using Rasch Analysis.
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Jun-Jul;35(3):346-355. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2042815. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
8
The Spanish adaptation of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia Heart: psychometric evidence in cardiac rehabilitation patients.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Aug;60(4):691-702. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08268-6. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
9
Reliability and validity of the korean version of the empathy quotient scale.
Psychiatry Investig. 2010 Mar;7(1):24-30. doi: 10.4306/pi.2010.7.1.24. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
10
Assessment of emotional intelligence in adults with down syndrome: Psychometric properties of the Emotional Quotient Inventory.
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 22;15(7):e0236087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236087. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric Study of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory in a Colombian Sample.
Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2022 Jan-Jun;15(1):42-54. doi: 10.21500/20112084.5371.
2
Adult Executive Functioning Inventory (ADEXI): Factor structure, convergent validity, and reliability of a Spanish adaptation.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Nov-Dec;29(6):1380-1386. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1880408. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
3
International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist.
Psicothema. 2020 Aug;32(3):390-398. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.306.
5
Adult executive functioning inventory (ADEXI): Validity, reliability, and relations to ADHD.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Mar;27(1). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1567. Epub 2017 May 12.
6
Development and validation of the Japanese version of cognitive flexibility scale.
BMC Res Notes. 2016 May 17;9:275. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2070-y.
7
Demystifying cognitive flexibility: Implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience.
Trends Neurosci. 2015 Sep;38(9):571-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2015.07.003.
8
Reliability and validity of two self-report measures of cognitive flexibility.
Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1381-1387. doi: 10.1037/a0038009. Epub 2014 Sep 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验