Suppr超能文献

死因判定是否需要多名编码员:2021年在南非进行的电话口头尸检访谈结果

Are multiple coders needed for cause of death assignment: results from telephonic verbal autopsy interviews conducted in 2021 in South Africa.

作者信息

Neethling Ian, Morof Diane, Glass Tracy, Kallis Natasha, Rao Chalapati, Bradshaw Debbie, Groenewald Pam

机构信息

Burden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.

Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, UK.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Oct 3;10:20552076241282395. doi: 10.1177/20552076241282395. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Verbal autopsy (VA) methods have emerged to estimate causes of death in populations lacking robust civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems. Despite World Health Organization endorsement of routine VA use, cost and efficiency concerns persist. Telephonic verbal autopsies (teleVAs) can reduce cost. Physician coding offers a valuable approach, but the expertise required makes it resource-intensive, often involving multiple coders for consensus.

OBJECTIVE

To assess inter-coder agreement for cause of death (CoD) in South African teleVAs using Kappa statistics, evaluating if agreement surpasses a 0.8 cut-off (very high) potentially allowing single coders.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study employed telephonic VA interviews on non-facility deaths in Cape Town (December 2020-September 2021). Trained fieldworkers administered a standard VA questionnaire. Each case's VA responses were reviewed independently by two physicians, medically certifying the CoD. A panel was used to solve disagreements. Cohen's kappa-statistic (-statistic) tested agreement levels.

RESULTS

Decedents were aged between 18 and 98 years. In total, 228 teleVAs (16.6% response rate) were conducted. Physician coding agreement was good overall (-statistic: 0.63). Diabetes mellitus (47%) and other non-communicable disease (42%) had initial agreement between physician coders in less than 50% of cases in comparison to consensus totals. COVID-19 (89%) and acute cardiac disease (83%) showed initial agreement in more than 80% of cases compared to consensus totals. A chi-square test revealed a significant difference in the number of causes listed on death notification forms for cases with and without agreement in Part 1 (χ = 14.71,  < 0.01), but not in Part 2 (χ = 4.97,  = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

CoD agreement might not be high enough to infer that single coders can be used instead of multiple coders. Challenges with co-morbidities and specific CoDs with multiple sequelae highlight the need for further research and refinement of VA methodologies for reliable CoD determination in routine practice.

摘要

引言

在缺乏完善的民事登记和人口动态统计(CRVS)系统的人群中,口头尸检(VA)方法已出现,用于估计死因。尽管世界卫生组织认可常规使用VA,但成本和效率问题依然存在。电话口头尸检(teleVA)可以降低成本。医生编码提供了一种有价值的方法,但所需的专业知识使其资源密集,通常需要多名编码员达成共识。

目的

使用卡方统计评估南非teleVA中死因编码员之间的一致性,评估一致性是否超过0.8的临界值(非常高),这可能允许使用单一编码员。

方法

一项横断面研究对开普敦的非医疗机构死亡病例进行了电话VA访谈(2020年12月至2021年9月)。经过培训的现场工作人员发放了标准的VA问卷。每个病例的VA回答由两名医生独立审查,以医学方式确定死因。使用一个小组来解决分歧。采用科恩卡方统计量(κ统计量)测试一致性水平。

结果

死者年龄在18岁至98岁之间。总共进行了228次teleVA(应答率为16.6%)。总体而言,医生编码一致性良好(κ统计量:0.63)。与共识总数相比,糖尿病(47%)和其他非传染性疾病(42%)在不到50%的病例中,医生编码员之间的初始一致性较低。与共识总数相比,COVID-19(89%)和急性心脏病(83%)在超过80%的病例中显示出初始一致性。卡方检验显示,第1部分中达成一致和未达成一致的病例在死亡通知表格上列出的死因数量存在显著差异(χ² = 14.71,P < 0.01),但第2部分中没有差异(χ² = 4.97,P = 0.17)。

结论

死因一致性可能不够高,无法推断可以使用单一编码员代替多名编码员。合并症和具有多种后遗症的特定死因带来的挑战凸显了在常规实践中进行进一步研究和完善VA方法以可靠确定死因的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1397/11457238/0afd4a2cdca4/10.1177_20552076241282395-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验