Suppr超能文献

世界卫生组织 2016 年死因推断工具:适合 InterVA、InSilicoVA 和 Tariff 2.0 自动分析的国际标准。

The WHO 2016 verbal autopsy instrument: An international standard suitable for automated analysis by InterVA, InSilicoVA, and Tariff 2.0.

机构信息

National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Public Health Service, Hyattsville, Maryland, United States of America.

WHO Collaborating Centre for Verbal Autopsy, Umeå Centre for Global Health Research, Division of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2018 Jan 10;15(1):e1002486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002486. eCollection 2018 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Verbal autopsy (VA) is a practical method for determining probable causes of death at the population level in places where systems for medical certification of cause of death are weak. VA methods suitable for use in routine settings, such as civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems, have developed rapidly in the last decade. These developments have been part of a growing global momentum to strengthen CRVS systems in low-income countries. With this momentum have come pressure for continued research and development of VA methods and the need for a single standard VA instrument on which multiple automated diagnostic methods can be developed.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

In 2016, partners harmonized a WHO VA standard instrument that fully incorporates the indicators necessary to run currently available automated diagnostic algorithms. The WHO 2016 VA instrument, together with validated approaches to analyzing VA data, offers countries solutions to improving information about patterns of cause-specific mortality. This VA instrument offers the opportunity to harmonize the automated diagnostic algorithms in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite all improvements in design and technology, VA is only recommended where medical certification of cause of death is not possible. The method can nevertheless provide sufficient information to guide public health priorities in communities in which physician certification of deaths is largely unavailable. The WHO 2016 VA instrument, together with validated approaches to analyzing VA data, offers countries solutions to improving information about patterns of cause-specific mortality.

摘要

背景

在死因医学认证体系薄弱的地方,死因推断(VA)是一种在人群层面确定死因的实用方法。过去十年中,适用于民事登记和生命统计(CRVS)系统等常规环境的 VA 方法迅速发展。这些发展是加强低收入国家 CRVS 系统这一全球趋势的一部分。随着这一趋势的发展,对 VA 方法的持续研究和开发以及对单一 VA 标准工具的需求带来了压力,这种工具可以开发多种自动化诊断方法。

方法和发现

2016 年,合作伙伴协调了世界卫生组织(WHO)VA 标准工具,该工具充分纳入了运行当前可用的自动化诊断算法所需的指标。世卫组织 2016 年 VA 工具,以及验证后的 VA 数据分析方法,为各国提供了改善特定死因死亡率模式信息的解决方案。该 VA 工具为未来的自动化诊断算法的协调提供了机会。

结论

尽管在设计和技术上有所改进,但只有在无法进行死因医学认证的情况下,才建议使用 VA。该方法仍然可以提供足够的信息,以指导医生认证死亡病例基本不可用的社区的公共卫生重点。世卫组织 2016 年 VA 工具,以及验证后的 VA 数据分析方法,为各国提供了改善特定死因死亡率模式信息的解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10f3/5761828/e21d41ef9307/pmed.1002486.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验