Division of Cardiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lake Success, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 8;19(10):e0311724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311724. eCollection 2024.
There are disparities in statin therapy for the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The role of structural racism in this disparity has not been examined.
This is a cross-sectional study of participants with ASCVD in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey from 2014-2017. Mediation analysis is utilized to estimate the direct effect of race and indirect effect of financial resources, access to care, and quality of care on statin usage.
The proportion of participants using statins by race/ethnicity were 58.5% for non-Hispanic Whites, 45% for Hispanics, 48.6% for Blacks, 61.6% for Asians, and 46.8% for Others. Statin usage was lower for Hispanics (OR = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [0.65-0.96]) and Blacks (OR = 0.80 [0.66-0.95]) compared to Whites. Hispanic, Black, and Other participants with the same financial resources, access to care, and quality of care as White participants did not have significantly different statin usage compared to White participants (Hispanic: OR = 0.98 [0.79-1.13]; Black (OR = 0.88 [0.76-1.06], Other: OR 0.76, 95% CI [0.56-1.15]). Hispanic, Black, and Other participants had significantly lower statin usage than subjects of the same race but with financial resources, access to care, and quality of care observed in White subjects (Hispanic: OR = 0.83 [0.83-0.92]; Black: OR = 0.91[0.88-0.94]; Other: OR = 0.92 [0.87-0.98]).
The indirect effect of race and ethnicity on statin therapy are significant but the direct effect of race and ethnicity on statin therapy are insignificant among Blacks and Hispanics compared to non-Hispanic Whites. This suggests that racial disparities in statin therapy are mediated through inequitably distributed resources, suggestive of the impact of structural racism.
在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的二级预防中,他汀类药物治疗存在差异。种族结构主义在这种差异中的作用尚未得到检验。
这是一项 2014-2017 年期间在医疗支出面板调查中患有 ASCVD 的参与者的横断面研究。利用中介分析来估计种族和金融资源、获得医疗保健和医疗保健质量的直接效应以及他汀类药物使用的间接效应。
按种族/族裔划分的参与者使用他汀类药物的比例为:非西班牙裔白人 58.5%,西班牙裔 45%,黑人 48.6%,亚洲人 61.6%,其他人 46.8%。与白人相比,西班牙裔(OR=0.79,95%置信区间[0.65-0.96])和黑人(OR=0.80 [0.66-0.95])使用他汀类药物的比例较低。与白人参与者相比,具有相同金融资源、获得医疗保健和医疗保健质量的西班牙裔、黑人和其他参与者使用他汀类药物的比例没有显著差异(西班牙裔:OR=0.98 [0.79-1.13];黑人:OR=0.88 [0.76-1.06],其他:OR 0.76,95%置信区间[0.56-1.15])。西班牙裔、黑人和其他参与者使用他汀类药物的比例明显低于具有相同种族的参与者,但金融资源、获得医疗保健和医疗保健质量与白人参与者观察到的情况一样(西班牙裔:OR=0.83 [0.83-0.92];黑人:OR=0.91[0.88-0.94];其他:OR=0.92 [0.87-0.98])。
种族和民族对他汀类药物治疗的间接影响在统计学上是显著的,但与非西班牙裔白人相比,黑人和西班牙裔的种族和民族对他汀类药物治疗的直接影响并不显著。这表明,他汀类药物治疗中的种族差异是通过不平等分配资源来介导的,这表明结构种族主义的影响。