• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过网络平台对行胸部手术患者进行的镇痛方法比较:初步设计、实施和验证研究。

Comparison of Analgesia Methods Through a Web Platform in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: Pilot Design, Implementation, and Validation Study.

机构信息

Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and System Engineering, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Unit for Research in Anaesthesia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 8;8:e56674. doi: 10.2196/56674.

DOI:10.2196/56674
PMID:39378419
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11496914/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain management is a vital and essential part of postoperative pectus excavatum (PE) care. Given the lack of an international consensus on guidelines for postoperative handling and evaluation, further research is necessary to compare the efficacy of existing pain management methods regarding pain relief, side effects, and long-term outcomes. In this context, the use of eHealth solutions for data mining can enhance data collection efficiency, reduce errors, and improve patient engagement. However, these digital health care frameworks are currently underused in the context of pain management for PE.

OBJECTIVE

This research is part of the broader Cryoanalgesia for Pain Management After Pectus Excavatum Repair (COPPER) study conducted by Giannina Gaslini Children's Hospital to address postoperative pain and recovery in PE patients treated with either standard thoracic epidural analgesia or cryoanalgesia, which is considered its innovative alternative approach. Specifically, this work is aimed at introducing a valuable tool for a comprehensive and quantitative comparison of the 2 analgesia strategies. The tool is a web and mobile app designed to facilitate data collection, management, and analysis of clinical data for pain assessment.

METHODS

The adopted approach involves a careful design based on clinician input, resulting in an intuitive app structure with 3 main screens. Digital surveys are borrowed from paper surveys, including medical history and preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up evaluations. XTENS 2.0 was used to manage the data, and Ionic facilitated cross-platform app development, ensuring secure and adaptable data handling.

RESULTS

Preliminary analysis on a pilot cohort of 72 patients (36 treated with standard therapy and 36 treated with cryoanalgesia) indicated successful patient enrollment and balanced representation across treatment groups and genders. Notably, hospital stay was significantly shorter with cryoanalgesia than with standard therapy (Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon 2-sided test with Bonferroni correction; P<.001; U statistic=287.5), validating its treatment efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

This work is a step toward modernizing health care through digital transformation and patient-centered models. The app shows promise in streamlined data collection and patient engagement, although improvements in multilingual support, data validation, and incentivization of questionnaire completion are warranted. Overall, this study highlights the potential of digital health solutions in revolutionizing health care practices, fostering patient involvement, and improving care quality.

摘要

背景

疼痛管理是漏斗胸(PE)术后护理的重要组成部分。由于缺乏关于术后处理和评估的国际共识指南,因此有必要进一步研究比较现有的疼痛管理方法在缓解疼痛、副作用和长期结果方面的疗效。在这种情况下,电子健康解决方案的数据挖掘可以提高数据收集效率,减少错误并提高患者参与度。然而,在 PE 的疼痛管理中,这些数字医疗保健框架目前并未得到充分利用。

目的

这项研究是 Giannina Gaslini 儿童医院进行的 Cryoanalgesia for Pain Management After Pectus Excavatum Repair(COPPER)研究的一部分,旨在解决接受标准胸椎硬膜外镇痛或冷冻镇痛治疗的 PE 患者的术后疼痛和康复问题,冷冻镇痛被认为是其创新的替代方法。具体来说,这项工作旨在引入一种有价值的工具,用于全面和定量比较这两种镇痛策略。该工具是一个网络和移动应用程序,旨在促进疼痛评估的临床数据的收集、管理和分析。

方法

所采用的方法基于临床医生的输入进行了精心设计,从而形成了一个具有 3 个主要屏幕的直观应用程序结构。数字调查借鉴了纸质调查,包括病史以及术前、术后和随访评估。XTENS 2.0 用于管理数据,而 Ionic 则促进了跨平台应用程序的开发,确保了数据的安全和适应性处理。

结果

对 72 例患者(36 例接受标准治疗,36 例接受冷冻镇痛治疗)的试点队列进行的初步分析表明,患者成功入组,并且治疗组和性别之间的代表性平衡。值得注意的是,冷冻镇痛组的住院时间明显短于标准治疗组(Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon 双侧检验,Bonferroni 校正;P<.001;U 统计量=287.5),验证了其治疗效果。

结论

这项工作是朝着通过数字化转型和以患者为中心的模式实现医疗保健现代化迈出的一步。该应用程序在简化数据收集和患者参与方面显示出了潜力,但需要改进多语言支持、数据验证和激励问卷完成等方面。总的来说,这项研究强调了数字健康解决方案在彻底改变医疗保健实践、促进患者参与和提高护理质量方面的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab4/11496914/8bced94dc323/formative_v8i1e56674_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab4/11496914/c235c87178a2/formative_v8i1e56674_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab4/11496914/d280585bb4fe/formative_v8i1e56674_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab4/11496914/d9d28d3bff2b/formative_v8i1e56674_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab4/11496914/bd7d4227a571/formative_v8i1e56674_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab4/11496914/8bced94dc323/formative_v8i1e56674_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab4/11496914/c235c87178a2/formative_v8i1e56674_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab4/11496914/d280585bb4fe/formative_v8i1e56674_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab4/11496914/d9d28d3bff2b/formative_v8i1e56674_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab4/11496914/bd7d4227a571/formative_v8i1e56674_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dab4/11496914/8bced94dc323/formative_v8i1e56674_fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Analgesia Methods Through a Web Platform in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: Pilot Design, Implementation, and Validation Study.通过网络平台对行胸部手术患者进行的镇痛方法比较:初步设计、实施和验证研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 8;8:e56674. doi: 10.2196/56674.
2
Cryoanalgesia for Pain Management After Pectus Excavatum Repair (COPPER) in Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.青少年漏斗胸修复术后疼痛管理的冷冻镇痛(COPPER):一项随机对照试验
Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 May;35(5):347-358. doi: 10.1111/pan.15090. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
3
Postoperative Pain Outcomes After Nuss Procedures: Comparison of Epidural Analgesia, Continuous Infusion of Local Anesthetic, and Preoperative Self-Hypnosis Training.Nuss手术术后疼痛结局:硬膜外镇痛、局部麻醉持续输注及术前自我催眠训练的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1234-1242. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0699. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
4
A retrospective comparison of thoracic epidural infusion and multimodal analgesia protocol for pain management following the minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum.鸡胸微创修复术后疼痛管理中胸段硬膜外输注与多模式镇痛方案的回顾性比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Dec;27(12):1227-1234. doi: 10.1111/pan.13264. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
5
Superior postoperative pain relief with thoracic epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair.与静脉自控镇痛相比,胸段硬膜外镇痛用于微创漏斗胸修复术后可提供更优的疼痛缓解效果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Oct;134(4):865-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.05.050.
6
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cryoanalgesia for Pain Management following Pectus Excavatum Repair: A Single-Center, Single-Blind, Parallel Design Study.随机对照试验研究冰袋镇痛在漏斗胸矫正术后的应用:单中心、单盲、平行设计研究。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Aug;34(4):338-345. doi: 10.1055/a-2117-4628. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
7
The Use of Cryoanalgesia in Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: Lessons Learned.冷冻镇痛在漏斗胸微创修复中的应用:经验教训
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Oct;29(10):1244-1251. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0203. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
8
A review of anesthetic techniques and outcomes following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (Nuss procedure).漏斗胸微创修复术(努斯手术)后麻醉技术及结果的综述。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Nov;26(11):1082-1090. doi: 10.1111/pan.12988. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
9
Intraoperative cryoanalgesia for managing pain after the Nuss procedure.用于管理努氏手术(Nuss手术)后疼痛的术中冷冻镇痛法
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Jun;52(6):920-924. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
10
Thoracoscopic cryoanalgesia: A new strategy for postoperative pain control in minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair.胸腔镜冷冻镇痛:微创漏斗胸修复术后疼痛控制的新策略。
Cir Pediatr. 2020 Jan 20;33(1):11-15.

引用本文的文献

1
Cryoanalgesia for Pain Management After Pectus Excavatum Repair (COPPER) in Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.青少年漏斗胸修复术后疼痛管理的冷冻镇痛(COPPER):一项随机对照试验
Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 May;35(5):347-358. doi: 10.1111/pan.15090. Epub 2025 Mar 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Pain Management Mobile Applications: A Systematic Review of Commercial and Research Efforts.疼痛管理移动应用程序:商业和研究努力的系统评价。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 5;23(15):6965. doi: 10.3390/s23156965.
2
A pilot study of multi-modal pain management for same-day discharge after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (Nuss procedure) in children.儿童微创漏斗胸矫正术(Nuss 手术)后当日出院的多模式疼痛管理初步研究。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Mar 26;39(1):159. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05429-7.
3
The management of pectus excavatum in pediatric patients: a narrative review.
小儿漏斗胸的治疗:一项叙述性综述。
Transl Pediatr. 2023 Feb 28;12(2):208-220. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-361. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
4
Next day discharge after the Nuss procedure using intercostal nerve cryoablation, intercostal nerve blocks, and a perioperative ERAS pain protocol.采用肋间神经冷冻消融术、肋间神经阻滞和围手术期加速康复外科(ERAS)疼痛方案,于术后次日出院。
J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Feb;57(2):213-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.10.034. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
5
Same-day discharge following the Nuss repair: A comparison.当日出院的 Nuss 修复术:比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Jan;57(1):135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.09.023. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
6
Cryoanalgesia enhances recovery from minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum resulting in reduced length of stay: A case-matched analysis of NSQIP-Pediatric patients.冷冻镇痛可促进微创漏斗胸矫正术后恢复,减少住院时间:一项 NSQIP-Pediatric 患者病例匹配分析。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Jul;56(7):1099-1102. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
A New Device for Thoracoscopic Cryoanalgesia in Pectus Excavatum Repair: Preliminary Single Center Experience.一种用于漏斗胸修复术中胸腔镜冷冻镇痛的新装置:单中心初步经验
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jan 18;8:614097. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.614097. eCollection 2020.
8
Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Minimally Invasive Pectus Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study Evaluating Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Using eHealth Technology.微创鸡胸手术强化康复路径的实施:一项基于人群的队列研究,使用电子健康技术评估短期和长期结果。
JMIR Perioper Med. 2018 Oct 12;1(2):e10996. doi: 10.2196/10996.
9
Nuss Procedure for Pectus Excavatum: A Comparison of Complications Between Young and Adult Patients.Nuss 手术治疗漏斗胸:年轻患者与成年患者并发症比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Sep;112(3):905-911. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.10.017. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
10
Intercostal nerve cryoablation versus thoracic epidural for postoperative analgesia following pectus excavatum repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肋间神经冷冻消融与胸椎硬膜外阻滞在漏斗胸修复术后镇痛的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Oct 1;31(4):486-498. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa151.