Frequent Extrasystolic Arrhythmia: Perceived Psychological Well-Being Evaluation.

BACKGROUND

To estimate quality of life (QOL) in patients with frequent extrasystolic arrhythmia (ES) using the SF-36 Health Status Survey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patient group consisted of 634 individuals (42-79 y.o) with ES >700 per 24 hours, as diagnosed by Holter ECG, and the control group included 106 patients (38-79 y.o.) with ES <700 per 24 hours. None of the patients had atrial fibrillation. The "early" ES subgroup A (n=192) experienced ES preceding the transmitral blood flow peak in the cardiac cycle (peak E) according to pulsed wave Doppler in transthoracic echocardiography (EchoCG). The "late" subgroup B (n=442) had ES after the transmitral blood flow peak, irrespective of the electric topic localization. Laboratory and instrumental methods included standard lipidograms, Holter ECG, EchoCG, Doppler ultrasound of brachiocephalic arteries, and coronary angiography. For QOL evaluation, we used the SF-36 Health Status Survey.

RESULTS

The patient groups did not differ with respect to main laboratory findings, instrumental parameters, and comorbidities, with the exception of type and quantity of ES. Physical and mental health to the SF-36 Health Status Survey indicated lower summary point scores in patient subgroup A ("early" ES) in comparison with the control group. The parameters were non-significantly lower in subgroup B.

CONCLUSIONS

The SF-36 Health Status Survey serves to assess the QOL in patients with ES. Frequent ES, especially its "early" variant in which ventricular systole precedes the transmitral blood flow peak in the biomechanic cardiac cycle is a predictor for lower QOL scores in patients with cardiovascular pathology.