• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是度量的问题吗?与克相比,方糖中的糖含量高估的情况不太明显。

A matter of the metric? Sugar content overestimation is less pronounced in sugar cubes versus grams.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany; Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

出版信息

Nutr Res. 2024 Nov;131:111-120. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.nutres.2024.09.007
PMID:39378658
Abstract

To make healthy food choices, consumers need to be aware of the sugar content of foods. Units act as an environmental cue that might influence sugar content estimation accuracy. The present study (1) tested whether estimations of sugar content are more accurate in sugar cubes vs grams, (2) compared accuracy of sugar content to estimations of the foods' weight and energy content, and (3) investigated gender, education, and body mass index as potential correlates. A sample of 886 adults was randomly assigned to estimating the sugar content of 10 common foods in grams or cubes. Estimations of sugar content diverged considerably from actual values in both groups (0.22 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 1.20; 0.20 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 1.10), but were more pronounced for sugar content estimations in grams in 7 out of 10 foods (ts ≥ 4.04, Ps < .001, Cohen's ds ≥ 0.14). Sugar content misestimation was somewhat more pronounced than misestimation of weight (0.05 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 1.43) and energy content (0.04 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 1.19). Relationships between sugar content misestimation and gender (0.00 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 0.33), education (-0.07 ≤ r ≤ 0.11), and body mass index (-0.08 ≤ r ≤ 0.06) were mostly negligible. Although sugar content estimations were somewhat more accurate in sugar cubes vs grams, estimation accuracy is generally low. In addition to promoting consumers' knowledge through labeling and education, additional avenues for interventions might need to be explored for sizeable effects on food choices.

摘要

为了做出健康的食物选择,消费者需要了解食物的含糖量。单位可以作为一种环境提示,可能会影响对糖含量估计的准确性。本研究(1)测试了在糖块与克之间估计糖含量是否更准确,(2)比较了糖含量与食物重量和能量含量估计的准确性,(3)调查了性别、教育和身体质量指数作为潜在的相关性。随机选择了 886 名成年人,让他们分别以克或块的形式估计 10 种常见食物的糖含量。在两组中,对糖含量的估计与实际值相差很大(0.22 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 1.20;0.20 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 1.10),但在 7 种食物中的 10 种食物中,以克为单位的糖含量估计更为明显(ts ≥ 4.04,Ps <.001,Cohen's ds ≥ 0.14)。糖含量的错误估计比重量(0.05 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 1.43)和能量含量(0.04 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 1.19)的错误估计更为明显。糖含量错误估计与性别(0.00 ≤ Cohen's ds ≤ 0.33)、教育(-0.07 ≤ r ≤ 0.11)和身体质量指数(-0.08 ≤ r ≤ 0.06)之间的关系大多可以忽略不计。尽管糖块的糖含量估计比克的估计更准确,但估计的准确性通常较低。除了通过标签和教育来提高消费者的知识外,还需要探索其他干预途径,以对食物选择产生显著影响。

相似文献

1
A matter of the metric? Sugar content overestimation is less pronounced in sugar cubes versus grams.是度量的问题吗?与克相比,方糖中的糖含量高估的情况不太明显。
Nutr Res. 2024 Nov;131:111-120. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
2
Quantifying Actual and Perceived Inaccuracy When Estimating the Sugar, Energy Content and Portion Size of Foods.量化估计食物糖、能量含量和份量时的实际和感知不准确程度。
Nutrients. 2019 Oct 11;11(10):2425. doi: 10.3390/nu11102425.
3
Validation of a digitally displayed photographic food portion-size estimation aid among women in urban and rural Malawi.验证数字化显示的摄影食物分量估计辅助工具在马拉维城乡女性中的有效性。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Dec;22(17):3140-3150. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019002428. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
4
Consumption of ultra-processed foods and its association with added sugar content in the diets of US children, NHANES 2009-2014.2009 - 2014年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES):美国儿童饮食中超加工食品的消费及其与添加糖含量的关联
Pediatr Obes. 2019 Dec;14(12):e12563. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12563. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
5
The international food unit: a new measurement aid that can improve portion size estimation.国际食物单位:一种可改善份量估计的新型测量辅助工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Sep 12;14(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0583-y.
6
Differential relationship between physical activity and intake of added sugar and nutrient-dense foods: A cross-sectional analysis.体力活动与添加糖和营养密集型食物摄入的差异关系:一项横断面分析。
Appetite. 2019 Sep 1;140:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 7.
7
Sugar labeling: How numerical information of sugar content influences healthiness and tastiness expectations.糖标识:糖含量的数值信息如何影响对健康和口感的预期。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 4;14(11):e0223510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223510. eCollection 2019.
8
Systematic review of the impact of nutrition claims related to fat, sugar and energy content on food choices and energy intake.系统评价营养声称(与脂肪、糖和能量含量相关)对食物选择和能量摄入的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):1296. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7622-3.
9
Relationships between children's sugar consumption at home and their food choices and consumption at school lunch.儿童在家中的糖摄入量与他们在学校午餐时的食物选择和摄入量之间的关系。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Nov;23(16):2941-2949. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003458. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
10
Individual differences in food perceptions and calorie estimation: an examination of dieting status, weight, and gender.食物认知和卡路里估计中的个体差异:对节食状态、体重和性别的考察。
Appetite. 2007 Sep;49(2):450-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.009. Epub 2007 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
'The wisdom of crowds': a survey on the rating of nutritional values of meals in digital pictures.“群体的智慧”:关于数字图片中膳食营养价值评分的一项调查
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2025 Jun 20;8(1):e001162. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2024-001162. eCollection 2025.