Odell Nicole E, Adlakha Deepti, Olcoń Katarzyna, Kondo Michelle, Astell-Burt Thomas, Feng Xiaoqi, Hipp J Aaron
Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, U.S.A.
Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Technische Universiteit Delft (TU Delft), The Netherlands.
J Healthy Eat Act Living. 2024 Dec 1;4(3):141-161. eCollection 2024.
Green social prescriptions (GSPs) include interventions designed to combat sedentary behavior and preventable diseases by leveraging the benefits of nature-based physical activity. As these programs are still evolving, there is limited data regarding the likelihood of participation from an international perspective. This study examined factors influencing participation likelihood in GSPs across various geographic contexts, levels of greenness, nature-relatedness, well-being, and socio-demographic variables. We conducted an online, cross-sectional survey with 2,467 participants from Australia, India, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States in September 2022. Participants reported their likelihood of participating in GSPs with four distinct outcomes, and we calculated an aggregate participation likelihood score. We used linear regression models to analyze associations between variables and participation likelihood, including models stratified by gender and country. Results showed that a more positive attitude towards nature was the strongest predictor of participation likelihood. Positive associations were found with educational attainment, financial comfort, and time spent in greenspace, while male gender and better well-being were linked to lower participation likelihood. Some differences in associations were revealed when stratified by country. An interaction between urban setting and greenness indicated that individuals in greener urban areas, particularly males, were less likely to feel the need for GSPs. These findings highlight that GSPs are likely to reach people who already share positive attitudes towards nature. Results indicate targeted interventions may be useful for individuals with less favorable attitudes towards nature, and males in particular, to increase likelihood of participation. Further research should explore cultural differences and the impact of health status on GSP participation. Understanding these factors can inform more equitable and effective GSP implementation.
绿色社会处方(GSPs)包括旨在通过利用基于自然的体育活动的益处来对抗久坐行为和预防可预防疾病的干预措施。由于这些项目仍在不断发展,从国际视角来看,关于参与可能性的数据有限。本研究考察了不同地理环境、绿化程度、与自然的关联度、幸福感以及社会人口统计学变量等因素对绿色社会处方参与可能性的影响。2022年9月,我们对来自澳大利亚、印度、新加坡、英国和美国的2467名参与者进行了一项在线横断面调查。参与者报告了他们参与具有四种不同结果的绿色社会处方的可能性,我们计算了一个综合参与可能性得分。我们使用线性回归模型来分析变量与参与可能性之间的关联,包括按性别和国家分层的模型。结果表明,对自然更积极的态度是参与可能性的最强预测因素。在教育程度、经济状况和在绿地花费的时间方面发现了正相关,而男性和幸福感较好则与较低的参与可能性相关。按国家分层时发现了一些关联差异。城市环境与绿化程度之间的相互作用表明,绿化程度较高的城市地区居民,尤其是男性,感觉对绿色社会处方需求较低。这些发现突出表明,绿色社会处方可能会惠及那些已经对自然持积极态度的人群。结果表明,针对性的干预措施可能对那些对自然态度不太积极的人,尤其是男性,提高参与可能性很有用。进一步的研究应探索文化差异以及健康状况对绿色社会处方参与的影响。了解这些因素可为更公平、有效地实施绿色社会处方提供参考。