Therapeutic efficacies of remnant ablation and radioiodine adjuvant therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer.

BACKGROUND

Successful ablation in I therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) includes both remnant ablation (RA) and radioiodine adjuvant therapy (RAT). This study aimed to differentiate between the therapeutic efficacies of RA and RAT, investigate the factors associated with their effectiveness, and assess their impact on prognosis.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with DTC who underwent initial I therapy at our tertiary center. The successful RA (SRA) and successful RAT (SRAT) was determined based on the I-diagnostic whole-body scan (Dx-WBS), TSH-stimulated thyroglobulin (sTg) levels, and neck ultrasound at the 6th month after I therapy. The patients were divided into complete response and persistent/recurrent disease groups during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients were included, 91.8% (213/232) of patients achieved SRA, only 8.1% (19/232) failed RA (FRA). Among the 213 patients in the SRA group, 70.4% (150/213) achieved SRAT and 29.6% (63/213) failed RAT (FRAT). Only pre-ablation sTg >10 ng/mL (OR = 46.968, 95% CI 9.731-226.699, P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor predicting the failure of RAT. The prognostic analysis included 215 patients, and 6.1% (13/215) were classified as persistent/recurrent disease at the last follow-up. Both pre-ablation sTg >10 ng/mL (HR = 4.765, 95% CI 1.371-16.566, P = 0.014) and FRAT (HR = 10.104, 95% CI 1.071-95.304, P = 0.043) independently predicted persistent/recurrent disease.

CONCLUSIONS

RA is easy to achieve successfully, whereas RAT evaluation provides greater value than RA for prognosis prediction. For patients with low Tg levels and no imaging evidence of disease, routine Dx-WBS during follow-up has minimal significance.