Suppr超能文献

药师主导的教育干预对哮喘控制和依从性的影响:单盲、随机临床试验。

Impact of pharmacist-led educational interventions on asthma control and adherence: single-blind, randomised clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, PMB 410001, Nigeria.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Jun;43(3):689-697. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01187-x. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

Abstract

Background Asthma is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Education is a critical component in the management of asthma. Objective This study sought to assess the impact of pharmacist-led educational interventions on asthma control and adherence. Setting Tertiary Hospitals in Nigeria Method This was a single-blind, three-arm, prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel-group study conducted in the Respiratory Units of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu State and the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos State between March 2016 and September 2017. The three arms were: Usual Care, Individual Intervention, Caregiver-assisted Intervention (1:1:1 ratio). The Intervention arms received education for 6 months while the Usual Care arm received no education. The Asthma Control Test and the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale were filled at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after baseline. Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Version 25.0 with statistical significance set as P < 0.05. Main outcome measure Asthma control and adherence. Results Seventy-eight (78) asthma patients participated; thirty-nine (39) per hospital; thirteen (13) in each arm. The Individual Intervention arm possessed significantly better asthma control compared to Usual Care at 3 months (21.42 Vs. 18.85; P = 0.004, t = 3.124, df = 25, 95% confidence interval = 0.88 - 4.28) and 6 months (21.81 Vs. 19.58; P = 0.003, t = 3.259, df = 25, 95% confidence interval = 0.82 - 3.64). The Individual Intervention arm also possessed significantly better adherence compared to Usual Care at 3 months (6.81 Vs. 4.94; P = 0.001, t = 3.706, df = 25, 95% confidence interval = 0.83 - 2.90) and 6 months (7.28 Vs. 5.13; P < 0.001, t = 4.094, df = 25, 95% confidence interval = 1.07 -3.24). The Caregiver-assisted Interventions had no significant improvement in asthma control and adherence. Conclusion The individualized educational interventions produced better improvements in asthma control and adherence.

摘要

背景

哮喘是全球发病率和死亡率的重要原因。教育是哮喘管理的重要组成部分。

目的

本研究旨在评估药师主导的教育干预对哮喘控制和依从性的影响。

地点

尼日利亚的三所教学医院。

方法

这是一项单盲、三臂、前瞻性、随机、对照、平行组研究,于 2016 年 3 月至 2017 年 9 月在尼日利亚大学教学医院呼吸科和拉各斯大学教学医院呼吸科进行。三个组分别为:常规护理、个体干预、照顾者辅助干预(1:1:1 比例)。干预组接受 6 个月的教育,而常规护理组不接受任何教育。在基线、3 个月和 6 个月后填写哮喘控制测试和 8 项 Morisky 药物依从性量表。使用 IBM SPSS 版本 25.0 进行数据分析,统计显著性设置为 P<0.05。

主要观察指标

哮喘控制和依从性。

结果

共有 78 名哮喘患者参与研究,每个医院 39 名,每个组 13 名。个体干预组在 3 个月时(21.42 比 18.85;P=0.004,t=3.124,df=25,95%置信区间=0.88-4.28)和 6 个月时(21.81 比 19.58;P=0.003,t=3.259,df=25,95%置信区间=0.82-3.64)的哮喘控制情况明显优于常规护理组。个体干预组在 3 个月时(6.81 比 4.94;P=0.001,t=3.706,df=25,95%置信区间=0.83-2.90)和 6 个月时(7.28 比 5.13;P<0.001,t=4.094,df=25,95%置信区间=1.07-3.24)的药物依从性也明显优于常规护理组。照顾者辅助干预对哮喘控制和依从性没有显著改善。

结论

个体化教育干预对哮喘控制和依从性的改善效果更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验