Department of Health Policy and Management, Peking University School of Public Health, No. 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Institute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100871, China.
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Oct 8;23(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02283-4.
Promoting health equity has been a worldwide goal, but serious challenges remain globally and within China. Multiple decomposition of the sources and determinants of health inequalities has significant implications for narrowing health inequalities and improve health equity.
Life expectancy (LE), healthy life expectancy (HALE), age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR), and age-standardized disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) rates in 31 provinces of mainland China were selected as health status indicators, obtained from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database. Temporal convergence analysis was used to test the evolving trends of health status. Dagum's Gini coefficient decomposition was used to decompose the overall Gini coefficient based on intraregional and interregional differences. Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition was used to calculate contributions of determinants to interregional differences. The factor-decomposed Gini coefficient was used to analyze the absolute and marginal contribution of each component to overall Gini coefficients.
From 1990-2019, China witnessed notable improvements in health status measured by LE, HALE, ASMR and age-standardized DALY rates.Nevertheless, the three regions (East, Central and West) exhibited significant inter-regional differences in health status, with the differences between the East and West being the largest. The adjusted short-term conditional β-convergence model indicated that the inter-provincial differences in LE, HALE, ASMR, and age-standardized DALY rates significantly converged at annual rates of 0.31%, 0.35%, 0.19%, and 0.28% over 30 years. The overall Gini coefficients of LE, HALE, and age-standardized DALY rates decreased, while the ASMR exhibited an opposite trend. Inter-regional and intra-regional differences accounted for >70% and <30% of overall Gini coefficients, respectively. Attribution analysis showed that socioeconomic determinants explained 85.77% to 91.93% of the eastern-western differences between 2010-2019, followed by health system determinants explaining 7.79% to 11.61%. The source-analysis of Gini coefficients of ASMR and age-standardized DALY rates revealed that noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) made the largest and increasing absolute contribution, while communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases (CMNNDs) had a diminishing and lower impact. However, NCDs exerted a negative marginal effect on the Gini coefficient, whereas CMNNDs exhibited a positive marginal effect, indicating that controlling CMNNDs may be more effective in reducing health inequities.
Regional differences are a major source of health inequities in China. Prioritizing prevention and control of CMNNDs, rather than NCDs, may yield more pronounced impacts on reducing health inequalities from the perspective of marginal effect, although NCDs remain the largest absolute contributor to health inequalities.
促进健康公平是全球目标,但全球和中国内部仍面临严峻挑战。健康不平等的来源和决定因素的多重分解对于缩小健康差距和提高健康公平具有重要意义。
选择中国大陆 31 个省的预期寿命(LE)、健康预期寿命(HALE)、年龄标准化死亡率(ASMR)和年龄标准化伤残调整生命年(DALY)率作为健康状况指标,这些指标来自全球疾病负担(GBD)数据库。使用时间收敛分析来检验健康状况的演变趋势。Dagum 的基尼系数分解用于根据区域内和区域间差异分解总体基尼系数。Oaxaca-Blinder 分解用于计算决定因素对区域间差异的贡献。因子分解基尼系数用于分析每个组成部分对总体基尼系数的绝对和边际贡献。
1990-2019 年,中国在 LE、HALE、ASMR 和年龄标准化 DALY 率衡量的健康状况方面取得了显著改善。然而,三个地区(东部、中部和西部)的健康状况存在显著的区域间差异,东部和西部之间的差异最大。调整后的短期条件β收敛模型表明,LE、HALE、ASMR 和年龄标准化 DALY 率的省级差异以每年 0.31%、0.35%、0.19%和 0.28%的速度显著收敛了 30 年。LE、HALE 和年龄标准化 DALY 率的总体基尼系数下降,而 ASMR 则呈现相反趋势。区域间和区域内差异分别占总体基尼系数的>70%和<30%。归因分析表明,社会经济决定因素在 2010-2019 年解释了东部和西部之间 85.77%至 91.93%的差异,其次是卫生系统决定因素解释了 7.79%至 11.61%。ASMR 和年龄标准化 DALY 率基尼系数的来源分析表明,非传染性疾病(NCDs)的绝对贡献最大且呈增加趋势,而传染性疾病、孕产妇、新生儿和营养疾病(CMNNDs)的影响则在减小且较低。然而,NCDs 对基尼系数产生了负边际效应,而 CMNNDs 则产生了正边际效应,这表明从边际效应的角度来看,控制 CMNNDs 可能更有效地减少健康不平等。
区域差异是中国健康不平等的主要来源。从边际效应的角度来看,优先预防和控制 CMNNDs,而不是 NCDs,可能会对减少健康不平等产生更显著的影响,尽管 NCDs 仍然是健康不平等的最大绝对贡献者。