• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国某单一中心7年间不同年龄组创伤患者的临床特征及死亡风险因素:一项回顾性研究

Clinical characteristics and mortality risk factors among trauma patients by age groups at a single center in Korea over 7 years: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Han Jonghee, Yoon Su Young, Seok Junepill, Lee Jin Young, Lee Jin Suk, Ye Jin Bong, Sul Younghoon, Kim Seheon, Kim Hong Rye

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Trauma Center, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea.

Deparment of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea.

出版信息

J Trauma Inj. 2023 Dec;36(4):329-336. doi: 10.20408/jti.2023.0035. Epub 2023 Nov 7.

DOI:10.20408/jti.2023.0035
PMID:39381583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11309241/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to compare the characteristics of patients with trauma by age group in a single center in Korea to identify the clinical characteristics and analyze the risk factors affecting mortality.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years who visited the Chungbuk National University Hospital Regional Trauma Center between January 2016 and December 2022 were included. The accident mechanism, severity of the injury, and outcomes were compared by classifying the patients into group A (18-64 years), group B (65-79 years), and group C (≥80 years). In addition, logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting death.

RESULTS

The most common injury mechanism was traffic accidents in group A (40.9%) and slipping in group B (37.0%) and group C (56.2%). Although group A had the highest intensive care unit admission rate (38.0%), group C had the highest mortality rate (9.5%). In the regression analysis, 3 to 8 points on the Glasgow Coma Scale had the highest odds ratio for mortality, and red blood cell transfusion within 24 hours, intensive care unit admission, age, and Injury Severity Score were the predictors of death.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with trauma, the mechanism, injured body region, and severity of injury differed among the age groups. The high mortality rate of elderly patients suggests the need for different treatment approaches for trauma patients according to age. Identifying factors affecting clinical patterns and mortality according to age groups can help improve the prognosis of trauma patients in the future.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们旨在比较韩国某单一中心不同年龄组创伤患者的特征,以确定临床特征并分析影响死亡率的危险因素。

方法

纳入2016年1月至2022年12月期间就诊于忠北国立大学医院区域创伤中心的年龄≥18岁的患者。将患者分为A组(18 - 64岁)、B组(65 - 79岁)和C组(≥80岁),比较其事故机制、损伤严重程度及结局。此外,进行逻辑回归分析以确定影响死亡的因素。

结果

A组最常见的损伤机制是交通事故(40.9%),B组(37.0%)和C组(56.2%)最常见的是滑倒。虽然A组的重症监护病房入住率最高(38.0%),但C组的死亡率最高(9.5%)。在回归分析中,格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3至8分的患者死亡比值比最高,24小时内输注红细胞、入住重症监护病房、年龄和损伤严重程度评分是死亡的预测因素。

结论

对于创伤患者,不同年龄组的损伤机制、受伤身体部位及损伤严重程度存在差异。老年患者的高死亡率表明需要根据年龄对创伤患者采取不同的治疗方法。确定不同年龄组影响临床模式和死亡率的因素有助于未来改善创伤患者的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd37/11309241/65b427a78790/jti-2023-0035f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd37/11309241/ca10fa63a650/jti-2023-0035f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd37/11309241/b40e548788e2/jti-2023-0035f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd37/11309241/65b427a78790/jti-2023-0035f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd37/11309241/ca10fa63a650/jti-2023-0035f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd37/11309241/b40e548788e2/jti-2023-0035f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd37/11309241/65b427a78790/jti-2023-0035f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical characteristics and mortality risk factors among trauma patients by age groups at a single center in Korea over 7 years: a retrospective study.韩国某单一中心7年间不同年龄组创伤患者的临床特征及死亡风险因素:一项回顾性研究
J Trauma Inj. 2023 Dec;36(4):329-336. doi: 10.20408/jti.2023.0035. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
2
[A new warning scoring system establishment for prediction of sepsis in patients with trauma in intensive care unit].[一种用于预测重症监护病房创伤患者脓毒症的新预警评分系统的建立]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Apr;31(4):422-427. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.04.010.
3
Is ventilator-associated pneumonia in trauma patients an epiphenomenon or a cause of death?创伤患者的呼吸机相关性肺炎是一种附带现象还是死亡原因?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2004 Fall;5(3):237-42. doi: 10.1089/sur.2004.5.237.
4
A study of mortality risk factors among trauma referrals to trauma center, Shiraz, Iran, 2017.2017年伊朗设拉子创伤中心创伤转诊患者死亡风险因素研究。
Chin J Traumatol. 2019 Aug;22(4):212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Is there an association between female gender and outcome in severe trauma? A multi-center analysis in the Netherlands.女性性别与严重创伤结局之间是否存在关联?荷兰多中心分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Feb 13;27(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0589-3.
6
Time and Risk Factors of Trauma-Related Mortality: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis From a National Level I Trauma Center.创伤相关死亡率的时间和危险因素:一项来自国家级创伤中心的 5 年回顾性分析。
J Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jul;39(7):672-682. doi: 10.1177/08850666231225607. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
7
Changes in the outcomes of severe trauma patients from 15-year experience in a Western European trauma ICU of Emilia Romagna region (1996-2010). A population cross-sectional survey study.基于艾米利亚-罗马涅地区一家西欧创伤重症监护病房15年经验(1996 - 2010年)的严重创伤患者结局变化。一项人群横断面调查研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jan;399(1):109-26. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1143-9. Epub 2013 Nov 30.
8
Comorbidity-Polypharmacy Score as Predictor of Outcomes in Older Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Validation Study.共病-多重用药评分作为老年创伤患者预后的预测指标:一项回顾性验证研究
World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):2068-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3041-5.
9
Whole blood: Total blood product ratio impacts survival in injured children.全血:血液制品总量比例影响创伤患儿的生存。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Oct 1;97(4):546-551. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004362. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
10
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology and Outcomes of Moderate-to-Severe Trauma Patients in a Regional Trauma Center: Challenges and Future Directions.区域创伤中心中重度创伤患者的流行病学与治疗结果:挑战与未来方向
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2025 Apr 24;21(2):67-78. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e14. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Enhancing geriatric trauma mortality prediction: Modifying and assessing the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score with net benefit and decision curve analysis.提高老年创伤死亡率预测:通过净效益和决策曲线分析修改和评估老年创伤结局评分
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Jun;32(6):668-680. doi: 10.1111/acem.15103. Epub 2025 Feb 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive Value of the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score in Older Patients After Trauma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.老年创伤结局评分对创伤后老年患者的预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Apr 23;15:4379-4390. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S362752. eCollection 2022.
2
Predicting Mortality of Korean Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Comparison between Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score.预测韩国老年创伤患者的死亡率:老年创伤结局评分与创伤和损伤严重程度评分的比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Jan;63(1):88-94. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.1.88.
3
Global changes in mortality rates in polytrauma patients admitted to the ICU-a systematic review.
全球 ICU 收治多发创伤患者死亡率的变化-系统评价。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Sep 30;15(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00330-3.
4
Are you "too old" to survive a traumatic brain injury?你是否“年纪太大”而无法从创伤性脑损伤中幸存下来?
Minerva Anestesiol. 2017 Nov;83(11):1121-1123. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12373-4. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
5
Predictors of Mortality in Trauma Patients Aged 80 years or Older.80岁及以上创伤患者的死亡率预测因素
Am Surg. 2016 Oct;82(10):926-929.
6
Multicenter external validation of the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score: A study by the Prognostic Assessment of Life and Limitations After Trauma in the Elderly (PALLIATE) consortium.老年创伤结局评分的多中心外部验证:老年创伤后生活与局限性预后评估(PALLIATE)联盟的一项研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Feb;80(2):204-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000926.
7
Geriatric Trauma: A Radiologist's Guide to Imaging Trauma Patients Aged 65 Years and Older.老年创伤:放射科医生对65岁及以上创伤患者的影像检查指南
Radiographics. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(4):1263-85. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140130. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
8
Estimating Geriatric Mortality after Injury Using Age, Injury Severity, and Performance of a Transfusion: The Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score.利用年龄、损伤严重程度和输血情况评估老年创伤后的死亡率:老年创伤结局评分
J Palliat Med. 2015 Aug;18(8):677-81. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0027. Epub 2015 May 14.
9
Geriatric trauma: demographics, injuries, and mortality.老年创伤:人口统计学、损伤和死亡率。
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Sep;26(9):e161-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182324460.
10
Long-term survival of adult trauma patients.成人创伤患者的长期生存。
JAMA. 2011 Mar 9;305(10):1001-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.259.