• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本卫生保健工作者对大型卫生信息交换的使用情况:用户级审计日志分析研究。

Health Care Worker Usage of Large-Scale Health Information Exchanges in Japan: User-Level Audit Log Analysis Study.

机构信息

Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Division of Medical Information Technology and Administration Planning, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Oct 9;12:e56263. doi: 10.2196/56263.

DOI:10.2196/56263
PMID:39382566
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11481819/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over 200 health information exchanges (HIEs) are currently operational in Japan. The most common feature of HIEs is remote on-demand viewing or searching of aggregated patient health data from multiple institutions. However, the usage of this feature by individual users and institutions remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to understand usage of the on-demand patient data viewing feature of large-scale HIEs by individual health care workers and institutions in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted audit log analyses of large-scale HIEs. The research subjects were HIEs connected to over 100 institutions and with over 10,000 patients. Each health care worker's profile and audit log data for HIEs were collected. We conducted four types of analyses on the extracted audit log. First, we calculated the ratio of the number of days of active HIE use for each hospital-affiliated doctor account. Second, we calculated cumulative monthly usage days of HIEs by each institution in financial year (FY) 2021/22. Third, we calculated each facility type's monthly active institution ratio in FY2021/22. Fourth, we compared the monthly active institution ratio by medical institution for each HIE and the proportion of cumulative usage days by user type for each HIE.

RESULTS

We identified 24 HIEs as candidates for data collection and we analyzed data from 7 HIEs. Among hospital doctors, 93.5% (7326/7833) had never used HIEs during the available period in FY2021/22, while 19 doctors used them at least 30% of days. The median (IQR) monthly active institution ratios were 0.482 (0.470-0.487) for hospitals, 0.243 (0.230-0.247) for medical clinics, and 0.030 (0.024-0.048) for dental clinics. In 51.9% (1781/3434) of hospitals, the cumulative monthly usage days of HIEs was 0, while in 26.8% (921/3434) of hospitals, it was between 1 and 10, and in 3% (103/3434) of hospitals, it was 100 or more. The median (IQR) monthly active institution ratio in medical institutions was 0.511 (0.487-0.529) for the most used HIE and 0.109 (0.0927-0.117) for the least used. The proportion of cumulative usage days of HIE by user type was complex for each HIE, and no consistent trends could be discerned.

CONCLUSIONS

In the large-scale HIEs surveyed in this study, the overall usage of the on-demand patient data viewing feature was low, consistent with past official reports. User-level analyses of audit logs revealed large disparities in the number of days of HIE use among health care workers and institutions. There were also large disparities in HIE use by facility type or HIE; the percentage of cumulative HIE usage days by user type also differed by HIE. This study indicates the need for further research into why there are large disparities in demand for HIEs in Japan as well as the need to design comprehensive audit logs that can be matched with other official datasets.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/957e/11481819/de15807557c0/medinform-v12-e56263-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/957e/11481819/02002e889a96/medinform-v12-e56263-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/957e/11481819/384cccfaba56/medinform-v12-e56263-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/957e/11481819/de15807557c0/medinform-v12-e56263-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/957e/11481819/02002e889a96/medinform-v12-e56263-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/957e/11481819/384cccfaba56/medinform-v12-e56263-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/957e/11481819/de15807557c0/medinform-v12-e56263-g003.jpg
摘要

背景

目前日本有超过 200 个健康信息交换中心(HIE)在运营。HIE 最常见的功能是远程按需查看或搜索来自多个机构的聚合患者健康数据。然而,个体用户和机构对这一功能的使用情况尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在了解日本大型 HIE 中个体医疗保健工作者和机构对患者数据按需查看功能的使用情况。

方法

我们对大型 HIE 进行了审核日志分析。研究对象为连接超过 100 家机构和超过 10000 名患者的 HIE。收集了每个医疗保健工作者的个人资料和 HIE 的审核日志数据。我们对提取的审核日志进行了四种类型的分析。首先,计算每个医院附属医生账户的 HIE 活跃使用天数的比例。其次,计算每个机构在 2021/22 财年的 HIE 累计月使用天数。第三,计算每个设施类型在 2021/22 财年的每月活跃机构比例。第四,比较每个 HIE 的每月活跃机构比例和每个 HIE 的用户类型累计使用天数的比例。

结果

我们确定了 24 个 HIE 作为数据收集的候选对象,并分析了 7 个 HIE 的数据。在医院医生中,93.5%(7326/7833)在 2021/22 财年的可用期间从未使用过 HIE,而 19 名医生至少使用了 30%的天数。医院的中位数(IQR)每月活跃机构比例为 0.482(0.470-0.487),诊所为 0.243(0.230-0.247),牙科诊所为 0.030(0.024-0.048)。在 51.9%(1781/3434)的医院中,HIE 的累计月使用天数为 0,而在 26.8%(921/3434)的医院中,使用天数在 1 到 10 天之间,在 3%(103/3434)的医院中,使用天数为 100 天或以上。使用最频繁的 HIE 的医疗机构中位数(IQR)每月活跃机构比例为 0.511(0.487-0.529),使用最不频繁的 HIE 的比例为 0.109(0.0927-0.117)。每个 HIE 用户类型的 HIE 累计使用天数比例复杂,没有明显的趋势。

结论

在本研究调查的大型 HIE 中,患者数据按需查看功能的整体使用情况较低,这与过去的官方报告一致。审核日志的用户级别分析显示,医疗保健工作者和机构之间的 HIE 使用天数存在很大差异。设施类型或 HIE 的 HIE 使用情况也存在很大差异;用户类型的 HIE 累计使用天数的百分比也因 HIE 而异。本研究表明,有必要进一步研究为什么日本对 HIE 的需求存在如此大的差异,以及需要设计可以与其他官方数据集匹配的综合审核日志。

相似文献

1
Health Care Worker Usage of Large-Scale Health Information Exchanges in Japan: User-Level Audit Log Analysis Study.日本卫生保健工作者对大型卫生信息交换的使用情况:用户级审计日志分析研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Oct 9;12:e56263. doi: 10.2196/56263.
2
Health Information Exchange Usage in Japan: Content Analysis of Audit Logs.日本的健康信息交换使用情况:审计日志的内容分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 May 27;13:e65575. doi: 10.2196/65575.
3
Health information exchanges--Unfulfilled promise as a data source for clinical research.健康信息交换——作为临床研究数据源的承诺未兑现。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Mar;87:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.005. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
4
Differing Strategies to Meet Information-Sharing Needs: Publicly Supported Community Health Information Exchanges Versus Health Systems' Enterprise Health Information Exchanges.满足信息共享需求的不同策略:公共支持的社区健康信息交换与卫生系统的企业健康信息交换
Milbank Q. 2016 Mar;94(1):77-108. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12180.
5
Health information exchange system usage patterns in three communities: practice sites, users, patients, and data.三个社区的健康信息交换系统使用模式:实践场所、用户、患者和数据。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Sep;82(9):810-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
6
Hospital Health Information Exchange Network Density and Predictors Across U.S. Hospital Referral Regions.美国医院转诊区域的医院健康信息交换网络密度及预测因素
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Mar;16(2):463-471. doi: 10.1055/a-2516-1692. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
7
Health information exchange in Finland: Usage of different access types and predictors of paper use.芬兰的健康信息交换:不同访问类型的使用情况和纸张使用的预测因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Feb;122:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
8
Characteristics of patient portals developed in the context of health information exchanges: early policy effects of incentives in the meaningful use program in the United States.在健康信息交换背景下开发的患者门户的特征:美国有意义使用计划中激励措施的早期政策效果
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 21;16(11):e258. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3698.
9
Drivers of health information exchange use during postacute care transitions.健康信息交流在康复期护理过渡期间的使用的驱动因素。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jan 1;25(1):e7-e13.
10
Using health information exchanges to calculate clinical quality measures: A study of barriers and facilitators.利用健康信息交换来计算临床质量指标:障碍和促进因素研究。
Healthc (Amst). 2016 Jun;4(2):104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Information Exchange Usage in Japan: Content Analysis of Audit Logs.日本的健康信息交换使用情况:审计日志的内容分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 May 27;13:e65575. doi: 10.2196/65575.
2
Consent mechanisms and default effects in health information exchange in Japan.日本健康信息交换中的同意机制与默认效应。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 24;7:1498072. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1498072. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of clinician use of Australia's national health information exchange in the emergency Department: An analysis of log data.预测临床医生在急诊科使用澳大利亚国家卫生信息交换的因素:对日志数据的分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 May;161:104725. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104725. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
Health Information Exchange between Specialists and General Practitioners Benefits Rural Patients.专科医生和全科医生之间的健康信息交换使农村患者受益。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 May;12(3):564-572. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731287. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Health information exchange use during dental visits.
就诊时的健康信息交换使用。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:1210-1219. eCollection 2020.
4
Usage of query-based health information exchange after event notifications.事件通知后基于查询的健康信息交换的使用情况。
JAMIA Open. 2019 Aug 1;2(3):291-295. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz028. eCollection 2019 Oct.
5
The complementary nature of query-based and directed health information exchange in primary care practice.基于查询的和定向的健康信息交换在初级保健实践中的互补性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jan 1;27(1):73-80. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz134.
6
Miyagi Medical and Welfare Information Network: A Backup System for Patient Clinical Information after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami.宫城医疗福利信息网络:东日本大地震及海啸后的患者临床信息备份系统。
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2019 May;248(1):19-25. doi: 10.1620/tjem.248.19.
7
Health Information Exchange.健康信息交换。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2015 Dec(220):1-465. doi: 10.23970/AHRQEPCERTA220.
8
Health Information Exchange Use (1990-2015): A Systematic Review.健康信息交换的使用情况(1990 - 2015年):一项系统综述。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Dec 7;5(1):27. doi: 10.5334/egems.249.
9
The impact of health information exchange on healthcare quality and cost-effectiveness: A systematic literature review.健康信息交换对医疗质量和成本效益的影响:系统文献回顾。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Jul;161:209-232. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
10
The benefits of health information exchange: an updated systematic review.健康信息交换的益处:更新的系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1259-1265. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy035.