• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Fact or Fiction-Accelerometry Versus Self-Report in Adherence to Pediatric Concussion Protocols: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.事实还是虚构——在遵循小儿脑震荡协议方面加速度计与自我报告的比较:前瞻性纵向队列研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Oct 9;7:e57325. doi: 10.2196/57325.
2
What Comes First: Return to School or Return to Activity for Youth After Concussion? Maybe We Don't Have to Choose.哪个优先:脑震荡后青少年是先返校还是先恢复活动?或许我们不必做出选择。
Front Neurol. 2019 Jul 23;10:792. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00792. eCollection 2019.
3
Evaluating Adherence to Return to School and Activity Protocols in Children After Concussion.评估儿童脑震荡后重返学校和活动协议的依从性。
Clin J Sport Med. 2021 Nov 1;31(6):e406-e413. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000800.
4
Concussion-Recovery Trajectories Among Tactical Athletes: Results From the CARE Consortium.战术运动员脑震荡康复轨迹:CARE 联盟研究结果。
J Athl Train. 2020 Jul 1;55(7):658-665. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-10-19.
5
Concussion Management for Children Has Changed: New Pediatric Protocols Using the Latest Evidence.儿童脑震荡管理已发生变化:采用最新证据的新儿科诊疗方案
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2020 Jan;59(1):5-20. doi: 10.1177/0009922819879457. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
6
Association Between Symptom Burden at Initiation of a Graduated Return to Activity Protocol and Time to Return to Unrestricted Activity After Concussion in Service Academy Cadets.在服务学院学员启动分级返回活动方案时的症状负担与脑震荡后恢复无限制活动的时间之间的关联。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(3):823-833. doi: 10.1177/03635465211067551. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
School performance in youth after a concussion.脑震荡后青少年的学业表现。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Dec 22;4:1008551. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1008551. eCollection 2022.
8
Is early activity resumption after paediatric concussion safe and does it reduce symptom burden at 2 weeks post injury? The Pediatric Concussion Assessment of Rest and Exertion (PedCARE) multicentre randomised clinical trial.小儿脑震荡后早期恢复活动是否安全,它能否减轻受伤后2周的症状负担?小儿脑震荡休息与运动评估(PedCARE)多中心随机临床试验。
Br J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;56(5):271-278. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105030. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
9
Return to activity after concussion affects dual-task gait balance control recovery.脑震荡后恢复活动会影响双任务步态平衡控制的恢复。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Apr;47(4):673-80. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000462.
10
Post-concussion return to play and return to school guidelines for children and youth: a scoping methodology.儿童和青少年脑震荡后重返比赛和重返学校指南:一种范围界定方法
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(12):1107-12. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.952452. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Neurophysiological markers of cognitive deficits and recovery in concussed adolescents.脑震荡青少年认知缺陷和恢复的神经生理学标志物。
Brain Res. 2020 Nov 1;1746:146998. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146998. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
2
Effectiveness of return to activity and return to school protocols for children postconcussion: a systematic review.脑震荡后儿童恢复活动和复学方案的有效性:一项系统评价
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020 Feb 24;6(1):e000667. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000667. eCollection 2020.
3
Post-concussive depression: evaluating depressive symptoms following concussion in adolescents and its effects on executive function.脑震荡后抑郁:评估青少年脑震荡后的抑郁症状及其对执行功能的影响。
Brain Inj. 2020 Mar 20;34(4):520-527. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1725841. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
4
Effect of epoch length on intensity classification and on accuracy of measurement under controlled conditions on treadmill: Towards a better understanding of accelerometer measurement.在控制条件下的跑步机上,时段长度对强度分类和测量准确性的影响:更好地理解加速度计测量。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0227740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227740. eCollection 2020.
5
Evaluating Adherence to Return to School and Activity Protocols in Children After Concussion.评估儿童脑震荡后重返学校和活动协议的依从性。
Clin J Sport Med. 2021 Nov 1;31(6):e406-e413. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000800.
6
Neurophysiological Correlates of Concussion: Deep Learning for Clinical Assessment.脑震荡的神经生理学相关性:深度学习在临床评估中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 22;9(1):17341. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53751-9.
7
Concussion Management for Children Has Changed: New Pediatric Protocols Using the Latest Evidence.儿童脑震荡管理已发生变化:采用最新证据的新儿科诊疗方案
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2020 Jan;59(1):5-20. doi: 10.1177/0009922819879457. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
8
Quantifying Activity Levels After Sport-Related Concussion Using Actigraph and Mobile (mHealth) Technologies.使用加速度计和移动(移动医疗)技术量化运动相关性脑震荡后的活动水平。
J Athl Train. 2019 Sep;54(9):929-938. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-93-18. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
9
What Comes First: Return to School or Return to Activity for Youth After Concussion? Maybe We Don't Have to Choose.哪个优先:脑震荡后青少年是先返校还是先恢复活动?或许我们不必做出选择。
Front Neurol. 2019 Jul 23;10:792. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00792. eCollection 2019.
10
Increasing Incidence of Concussion: True Epidemic or Better Recognition?脑震荡发生率增高:是真正的流行,还是更好的识别?
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2020 Jan/Feb;35(1):E60-E66. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000503.

事实还是虚构——在遵循小儿脑震荡协议方面加速度计与自我报告的比较:前瞻性纵向队列研究

Fact or Fiction-Accelerometry Versus Self-Report in Adherence to Pediatric Concussion Protocols: Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.

作者信息

DeMatteo Carol, Randall Sarah, Jakubowski Josephine, Stazyk Kathy, Obeid Joyce, Noseworthy Michael, Mazurek Michael, Timmons Brian W, Connolly John, Giglia Lucia, Hall Geoffrey, Lin Chia-Yu, Perrotta Samantha

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada, 1 9055259140.

CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Oct 9;7:e57325. doi: 10.2196/57325.

DOI:10.2196/57325
PMID:39383478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11482736/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concussion, or mild traumatic brain injury, is a growing public health concern, affecting approximately 1.2% of the population annually. Among children aged 1-17 years, concussion had the highest weighted prevalence compared to other injury types, highlighting the importance of addressing this issue among the youth population.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess adherence to Return to Activity (RTA) protocols among youth with concussion and to determine if better adherence affected time to recovery and the rate of reinjury.

METHODS

Children and youth (N=139) aged 5-18 years with concussion were recruited. Self-reported symptoms and protocol stage of recovery were monitored every 48 hours until symptom resolution was achieved. Daily accelerometry was assessed with the ActiGraph. Data were collected to evaluate adherence to the RTA protocol based on physical activity cutoff points corresponding to RTA stages. Participants were evaluated using a battery of physical, cognitive, and behavioral measures at recruitment, upon symptom resolution, and 3 months post symptom resolution.

RESULTS

For RTA stage 1, a total of 13% of participants were adherent based on accelerometry, whereas 11% and 34% of participants were adherent for stage 2 and 3, respectively. The median time to symptom resolution was 13 days for participants who were subjectively reported adherent to the RTA protocol and 20 days for those who were subjectively reported as nonadherent (P=.03). No significant agreement was found between self-report of adherence and objective actigraphy adherence to the RTA protocol as well as to other clinical outcomes, such as depression, quality of life, and balance. The rate of reinjury among the entire cohort was 2% (n=3).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, adherence to staged protocols post concussion was minimal when assessed with accelerometers, but adherence was higher by self-report. More physical activity restrictions, as specified in the RTA protocol, resulted in lower adherence. Although objective adherence was low, reinjury rate was lower than expected, suggesting a protective effect of being monitored and increased youth awareness of protocols. The results of this study support the move to less restrictive protocols and earlier resumption of daily activities that have since been implemented in more recent protocols.

摘要

背景

脑震荡,即轻度创伤性脑损伤,是一个日益受到关注的公共卫生问题,每年影响约1.2%的人口。在1至17岁的儿童中,与其他损伤类型相比,脑震荡的加权患病率最高,这凸显了在青年人群中解决这一问题的重要性。

目的

本研究旨在评估脑震荡青年对恢复活动(RTA)方案的依从性,并确定更好的依从性是否会影响恢复时间和再次受伤率。

方法

招募了5至18岁患有脑震荡的儿童和青年(N=139)。每48小时监测一次自我报告的症状和恢复方案阶段,直至症状消失。使用ActiGraph评估每日加速度计数据。根据与RTA阶段相对应的身体活动临界点收集数据,以评估对RTA方案的依从性。在招募时、症状消失时以及症状消失后3个月,使用一系列身体、认知和行为测量方法对参与者进行评估。

结果

对于RTA第1阶段,根据加速度计数据,共有13%的参与者依从,而第2阶段和第3阶段的依从率分别为11%和34%。主观报告依从RTA方案的参与者症状消失的中位时间为13天,主观报告不依从的参与者为20天(P=0.03)。在RTA方案的自我报告依从性与客观加速度计依从性之间,以及与其他临床结果(如抑郁、生活质量和平衡)之间,未发现显著一致性。整个队列中的再次受伤率为2%(n=3)。

结论

总体而言,使用加速度计评估时,脑震荡后对分阶段方案的依从性极低,但自我报告的依从性较高。RTA方案中规定的更多身体活动限制导致依从性较低。尽管客观依从性较低,但再次受伤率低于预期,这表明监测具有保护作用,且青年对方案的认识有所提高。本研究结果支持转向限制较少的方案,并更早恢复日常活动,这一点已在最近的方案中得到实施。