Schlager Daniel, Leiber-Caspers Christian
Urologie Villa Kuenzer, Dreikönigstr. 12, 79102, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Alexianer Krankenhaus Krefeld, Dießemer Bruch 81, 47805, Krefeld, Deutschland.
Urologie. 2024 Nov;63(11):1097-1102. doi: 10.1007/s00120-024-02453-w. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
Conservative treatment of Peyronie's disease (induratio penis plastica, IPP) remains largely unsuccessful despite decades of research, as the exact disease pathogenesis remains unclear. Currently, IPP is understood as a benign, localized, progressive connective tissue disorder of the tunica albuginea, in which repetitive microtrauma triggers an inflammatory process leading to fibrosis formation. The new "conservative" treatment approaches focus on immune-modulatory and regenerative mechanisms, but significant therapeutic success is still lacking. Treatments such as extracorporeal shockwave therapy, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), stem cell therapy, hyaluronic acid, and botulinum toxin are promising theoretical approaches, but their efficacy is often contradictory and they remain disputed and inadequately supported by studies. Research on these therapeutic approaches is often limited by extremely high costs and the regulations for clinical studies according to the Medicines Act, albeit necessary to further evaluate their effectiveness.
尽管经过数十年研究,佩罗尼氏病(阴茎硬结症,IPP)的保守治疗大多未获成功,因为确切的疾病发病机制仍不清楚。目前,IPP被认为是一种白膜的良性、局限性、进行性结缔组织疾病,其中重复性微创伤引发炎症过程,导致纤维化形成。新的“保守”治疗方法侧重于免疫调节和再生机制,但仍缺乏显著的治疗成功案例。诸如体外冲击波疗法、富血小板血浆(PRP)、干细胞疗法、透明质酸和肉毒杆菌毒素等治疗方法是有前景的理论方法,但其疗效往往相互矛盾,且仍存在争议,研究支持不足。尽管根据《药品法》进一步评估这些治疗方法的有效性有必要,但对这些治疗方法的研究往往受到极高成本和临床研究法规的限制。