• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重建人工智能伦理原则:人工智能的罗尔斯式伦理。

Reconstructing AI Ethics Principles: Rawlsian Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.

机构信息

Turku School of Economics, Information Systems Sciences, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 9;30(5):46. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00507-y.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-024-00507-y
PMID:39384600
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11464555/
Abstract

The popularisation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies has sparked discussion about their ethical implications. This development has forced governmental organisations, NGOs, and private companies to react and draft ethics guidelines for future development of ethical AI systems. Whereas many ethics guidelines address values familiar to ethicists, they seem to lack in ethical justifications. Furthermore, most tend to neglect the impact of AI on democracy, governance, and public deliberation. Existing research suggest, however, that AI can threaten key elements of western democracies that are ethically relevant. In this paper, Rawls's theory of justice is applied to draft a set of guidelines for organisations and policy-makers to guide AI development towards a more ethical direction. The goal is to contribute to the broadening of the discussion on AI ethics by exploring the possibility of constructing AI ethics guidelines that are philosophically justified and take a broader perspective of societal justice. The paper discusses how Rawls's theory of justice as fairness and its key concepts relate to the ongoing developments in AI ethics and gives a proposition of how principles that offer a foundation for operationalising AI ethics in practice could look like if aligned with Rawls's theory of justice as fairness.

摘要

人工智能(AI)技术的普及引发了人们对其伦理影响的讨论。这一发展迫使政府组织、非政府组织和私营公司做出反应,为未来伦理人工智能系统的发展起草道德准则。虽然许多道德准则都涉及到伦理学家所熟悉的价值观,但它们似乎缺乏道德上的理由。此外,大多数准则往往忽视了人工智能对民主、治理和公共审议的影响。然而,现有研究表明,人工智能可能会威胁到与伦理相关的西方民主的关键要素。在本文中,罗尔斯的正义论被应用于为组织和政策制定者起草一套指导方针,以引导人工智能朝着更加道德的方向发展。目标是通过探索构建在哲学上有理由、更广泛地关注社会正义的人工智能道德准则的可能性,为人工智能伦理的讨论提供帮助。本文讨论了罗尔斯的公平正义理论及其核心概念如何与人工智能伦理的最新发展相关联,并提出了一个建议,即如果将其与罗尔斯的公平正义理论相一致,那么为实践中的人工智能伦理提供操作基础的原则可能会是什么样子。

相似文献

1
Reconstructing AI Ethics Principles: Rawlsian Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.重建人工智能伦理原则:人工智能的罗尔斯式伦理。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 9;30(5):46. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00507-y.
2
Trust, Trustworthiness, and the Future of Medical AI: Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Expert Workshop.信任、可信度与医学人工智能的未来:跨学科专家研讨会成果
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 2;27:e71236. doi: 10.2196/71236.
3
AI Through Ethical Lenses: A Discourse Analysis of Guidelines for AI in Healthcare.人工智能的伦理视角:医疗保健中人工智能指南的话语分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Jun 4;30(3):24. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00486-0.
4
Responsible research impact: Ethics for making a difference.负责任的研究影响:创造改变的伦理准则。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Mar 31;5:92. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19649.1. eCollection 2025.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Shaping the Future of Dental Education: A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Integration Strategies.塑造牙科教育的未来:人工智能(AI)整合策略的范围综述
Cureus. 2025 May 27;17(5):e84921. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84921. eCollection 2025 May.
8
Ethical Guidance for Disaster Response, Specifically Around Crisis Standards of Care: A Systematic Review.灾害应对的伦理指导,特别是围绕危机护理标准:一项系统综述。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(9):e1-e9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303882. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
9
What makes a 'good' decision with artificial intelligence? A grounded theory study in paediatric care.如何利用人工智能做出“好”的决策?一项关于儿科护理的扎根理论研究。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 May 20;30(3):183-193. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112919.
10
Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis.多利益相关方对人工智能在医疗保健中的应用的偏好:系统评价和主题分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116357. Epub 2023 Nov 4.