Bapat Roopali, Pearlman Stephen
Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, USA.
The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
J Perinatol. 2025 Apr;45(4):417-425. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02124-w. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) use their collective experiences from participating centers to accelerate the translation of evidence into practice, resulting in reduced variation and improved clinical outcomes. There are several regional, national, and international QICs in neonatology. In this review, we discuss the framework and evaluate national QICs primarily based in US and share the contributions of selected studies. We found that the QICs in neonatology play a significant role in identification of target topics, developing best practices, improving provider knowledge, building QI capacity, and improving outcomes. The key strengths of QICs are that they produce more generalizable learnings, involve a larger patient population which enhances statistical analysis, and offer resources to smaller institutions. Limitations include institutions contributing unequally to the overall results, difficulty in interpreting results when multiple improvement strategies are applied simultaneously, and the possible lack of academic recognition for individual center leadership.
质量改进协作组织(QICs)利用参与中心的集体经验,加速将证据转化为实践,从而减少差异并改善临床结果。新生儿科有几个区域、国家和国际层面的QICs。在本综述中,我们讨论了相关框架,并主要对以美国为基地的国家QICs进行评估,同时分享所选研究的贡献。我们发现,新生儿科的QICs在确定目标主题、制定最佳实践、提高医疗服务提供者的知识水平、建设质量改进能力以及改善结果方面发挥着重要作用。QICs的主要优势在于它们能产生更具普遍性的经验教训,涉及更多患者群体从而增强统计分析,并为较小的机构提供资源。局限性包括各机构对总体结果的贡献不均衡、同时应用多种改进策略时难以解释结果,以及个别中心领导可能缺乏学术认可。