• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左侧卧位下机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the left lateral decubitus position.

作者信息

Lee Shigeru, Tamura Tatsuro, Miki Yuichiro, Nishi Satoshi, Miyamoto Hironari, Ishidate Takemi, Kasashima Hiroaki, Fukuoka Tatsunari, Yoshii Mami, Shibutani Masatsune, Toyokawa Takahiro, Maeda Kiyoshi

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3, Asahimachi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7208-7216. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11282-z. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-11282-z
PMID:39384656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11614937/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) in the prone position for esophageal cancer has been currently increasing worldwide. In future, as surgical-assisted robots become more widespread, it is estimated that only two methods of transthoracic approach will remain: RAMIE and open thoracotomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. RAMIE in the left lateral decubitus position (RAMIE-LLDP) has the same field of view as open thoracotomy, is safe in emergency situations, and provides education on open thoracotomy.

METHODS

Between September 2020 and April 2024, RAMIE-LLDP was performed in 64 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer. RAMIE-LLDP was performed with the operating table rotated and tilted 45° to the ventral side under artificial pneumothorax. The hand-control setting of the surgical-assist robot system was reversed left to right when the Patient Cart was rolled from the same direction as the RAMIE in the prone position.

RESULTS

The mean total surgery and console times during the thoracic procedure were 254-min overall and 225 min in the last 24 cases and 195-min overall and 178- min in the last 24 cases, respectively. The mean amount of blood loss was 203.4 g overall and 28.3 g in the last 24 cases. Postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy with Clavien-Dindo classification (CD) was ≥ 2 in six patients (9.4%). Postoperative pneumonia with CD ≥ 2 was observed in 11 patients (17.2%). Conversion to open thoracotomy was observed in three patients (4.7%). In all three patients, an immediate conversion to thoracotomy without patients' position change was actually possible and no serious complications were noted. No mortality occurred within 30 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

RAMIE-LLDP which facilitates emergency thoracotomy has perioperative results comparable to those of conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy and is educational for open surgery. RAMIE-LLDP is the safest and most optimal surgery for esophageal cancer.

摘要

背景

目前,在全球范围内,采用俯卧位机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术(RAMIE)治疗食管癌的应用正在增加。未来,随着手术辅助机器人的普及,预计胸段食管癌的经胸入路将仅保留两种方法:RAMIE和开胸手术。左侧卧位机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术(RAMIE-LLDP)与开胸手术具有相同的视野,在紧急情况下安全,并且能提供开胸手术相关教学。

方法

2020年9月至2024年4月期间,连续对64例食管癌患者实施了RAMIE-LLDP。在人工气胸下,将手术台向腹侧旋转并倾斜45°进行RAMIE-LLDP。当患者推车从与俯卧位RAMIE相同方向推来时,手术辅助机器人系统的手动控制设置左右反转。

结果

胸段手术期间的平均总手术时间和控制台时间分别为:总体254分钟,最近24例为225分钟;总体195分钟,最近24例为178分钟。平均失血量分别为:总体203.4克,最近24例为28.3克。根据Clavien-Dindo分类(CD),术后6例患者(9.4%)出现≥2级喉返神经麻痹。11例患者(17.2%)观察到CD≥2级术后肺炎。3例患者(4.7%)转为开胸手术。在所有3例患者中,实际上可以立即转为开胸手术而无需改变患者体位,且未发现严重并发症。术后30天内无死亡病例。

结论

便于紧急开胸手术的RAMIE-LLDP围手术期结果与传统胸腔镜食管癌切除术相当,且对开放手术具有教学意义。RAMIE-LLDP是食管癌最安全、最理想的手术方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5847/11614937/410bf75f7e72/464_2024_11282_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5847/11614937/08385f0b69b5/464_2024_11282_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5847/11614937/d7ed8a1770d4/464_2024_11282_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5847/11614937/d7a36c85220b/464_2024_11282_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5847/11614937/d49d3f01398f/464_2024_11282_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5847/11614937/410bf75f7e72/464_2024_11282_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5847/11614937/08385f0b69b5/464_2024_11282_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5847/11614937/d7ed8a1770d4/464_2024_11282_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5847/11614937/d7a36c85220b/464_2024_11282_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5847/11614937/d49d3f01398f/464_2024_11282_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5847/11614937/410bf75f7e72/464_2024_11282_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the left lateral decubitus position.左侧卧位下机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7208-7216. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11282-z. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
2
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz060.
3
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients.机器人辅助与传统微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的短期疗效比较:18187 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 16;18(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01880-3.
4
Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.机器人辅助微创食管切除术在治疗食管鳞癌方面真的比电视辅助微创食管切除术具有淋巴结清扫优势吗?基于短期结果的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jul 1;32(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy110.
5
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.机器人辅助微创食管癌根治术与电视辅助微创食管癌根治术治疗食管癌的短期疗效比较:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Apr;15(2):270-278. doi: 10.1111/ases.12992. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
6
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.机器人辅助微创食管切除术与传统微创食管切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Jun;15(3):e1988. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1988. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
7
Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).机器人辅助食管切除术(RAE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗可切除的食管鳞癌:一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验的方案(RAMIE 试验,机器人辅助微创食管切除术)。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5799-6.
8
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.机器人辅助、视频辅助与开放性食管癌切除术临床疗效的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2129228. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29228.
9
Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.机器人辅助微创食管切除术与电视辅助微创食管切除术治疗胸段中段食管癌的短期疗效比较。
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Aug 1;31(8). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy012.
10
Anatomical factor associated with thoracic procedural difficulty in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.与机器人辅助微创食管切除术胸内操作难度相关的解剖因素。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jun 19;409(1):190. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03378-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of recurrent nerve injury among esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.食管癌切除术后患者喉返神经损伤的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Open Sci. 2025 May 30;27:68-80. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.05.009. eCollection 2025 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Doublet chemotherapy, triplet chemotherapy, or doublet chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced oesophageal cancer (JCOG1109 NExT): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.双药化疗、三药化疗或双药化疗联合放疗作为局部晚期食管癌的新辅助治疗(JCOG1109 NExT):一项随机、对照、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2024 Jul 6;404(10447):55-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00745-1. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
2
Evaluation of Intraoperative Neural Monitoring During Thoracoscopic Surgery for Esophageal Cancer.胸腔镜手术治疗食管癌术中神经监测的评估。
Anticancer Res. 2024 Jan;44(1):157-166. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16798.
3
Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1.
日本食管癌学会编辑的《2022年食管癌诊疗指南》:第1部分。
Esophagus. 2023 Jul;20(3):343-372. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-00993-2. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
4
Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial.机器人辅助与传统微创食管癌切除术治疗可切除食管鳞状细胞癌:一项多中心随机对照试验的早期结果:RAMIE试验
Ann Surg. 2022 Apr 1;275(4):646-653. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005023.
5
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与开胸经胸食管癌切除术治疗可切除食管癌的随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):621-630. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031.
7
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.利用日本全国性数据库对开放式与微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的短期结局进行比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1821-1827. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5808-4. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
8
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial.微创与开放食管切除术的比较:先前报道的随机对照试验的 3 年随访:TIME 试验。
Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):232-236. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002171.
9
Clinical utility of a novel hybrid position combining the left lateral decubitus and prone positions during thoracoscopic esophagectomy.胸腔镜下食管切除术期间一种结合左侧卧位和俯卧位的新型混合体位的临床效用。
World J Surg. 2014 Feb;38(2):410-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2258-4.
10
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.微创与开放手术治疗食管癌的疗效比较:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. Epub 2012 May 1.