• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订后的身体意识评定问卷(BARQ-R)在有和无肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年人中的 Rasch 验证。

Rasch validation of the revised body awareness rating questionnaire (BARQ-R) in adults with and without musculoskeletal pain.

机构信息

Rehabilitation Science Graduate Program, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Division of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 9;25(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07893-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07893-1
PMID:39385132
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11462683/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Revised Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire (BARQ-R) is a self-report measure of body awareness. First aim: evaluate the structural validity of BARQ-R with Rasch analysis in community-dwelling Americans with and without musculoskeletal pain. Subaim: validate a Rasch analysis of BARQ-R done in Norwegian adults with musculoskeletal pain, through a secondary analysis in our sample of Americans with musculoskeletal pain.

METHODS

BARQ-R has 12 items with scores ranging from 0 (completely disagree) to 3 (completely agree), with higher total scores reflecting lower degrees of body awareness. Through Rasch analysis, we evaluated unidimensionality, item hierarchy, and structural validity with item and person fit, targeting, person separation reliability (PSR), local item dependence (LID), differential item functioning (DIF), and principal components analysis of residuals (PCAR).

RESULTS

We recruited 623 adults with and without musculoskeletal pain (average age = 50.27 ± 17.25 years). After rescoring 1 item and deleting 3 items, the 9-item Rasch-based BARQ-R had no misfitting items, the hierarchical ordering of the items followed clinical expectations, 3 (0.48%) misfitting persons, person mean location: -0.62 ± 1.03 logits (max -0.53, min 0.72 logits), minimal floor effect (1.93%) and ceiling effect (0.48%), no DIF, and PSR = 0.72. LID was found in 5 item pairs. The PCAR's eigenvalue was 2.18. The secondary Rasch analysis in 152 adults with musculoskeletal pain (average age = 52.26 ± 16.13 years), demonstrated that, after rescoring 2 items, BARQ-R had no misfitting items and only 2 (1.32%) misfitting persons, good targeting (person mean location: -0.36 ± 0.88 logits), minimal floor effect (0.01%), no ceiling effect (0.00%), and PSR = 0.75. LID was found in 6 item pairs. The PCAR's eigenvalue was 2.47.

CONCLUSIONS

BARQ-R had good item and person fit. PSR with items covering a limited logit range suggests that differing levels of body awareness are measured with only modest precision. Adding and revising items to cover a wider range of body awareness and to better address concepts of internal body awareness and body movements would improve BARQ-R's utility. Further analyses are needed before BARQ-R's use for research or in the clinic. In addition, future BARQ-R Rasch validation is needed in other populations with body awareness deficits, such as stroke or spinal cord injury.

摘要

背景

修订后的身体意识评定问卷(BARQ-R)是一种自我报告的身体意识测量工具。目的一:通过对有和没有肌肉骨骼疼痛的社区居民进行 Rasch 分析,评估 BARQ-R 的结构有效性。目的二:通过对我们的肌肉骨骼疼痛患者样本进行二次分析,验证在挪威有肌肉骨骼疼痛成年人中进行的 BARQ-R 的 Rasch 分析的有效性。

方法

BARQ-R 有 12 个项目,分数范围为 0(完全不同意)到 3(完全同意),总分越高表示身体意识越低。通过 Rasch 分析,我们使用项目和个体拟合、目标、个体分离可靠性(PSR)、局部项目依赖(LID)、差异项目功能(DIF)和残差主成分分析(PCAR)来评估单维性、项目层次结构和结构有效性。

结果

我们招募了 623 名有和没有肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年人(平均年龄 50.27±17.25 岁)。在重新评分 1 项并删除 3 项后,基于 Rasch 的 9 项 BARQ-R 没有不拟合的项目,项目的层次结构符合临床预期,3 名(0.48%)不拟合的个体,个体平均位置:-0.62±1.03 对数单位(最大-0.53,最小 0.72 对数单位),最小的地板效应(1.93%)和天花板效应(0.48%),没有 DIF,PSR=0.72。在 5 对项目中发现了 LID。PCAR 的特征值为 2.18。在 152 名有肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年人(平均年龄 52.26±16.13 岁)的二次 Rasch 分析中,表明在重新评分 2 项后,BARQ-R 没有不拟合的项目,只有 2 名(1.32%)不拟合的个体,良好的目标定位(个体平均位置:-0.36±0.88 对数单位),最小的地板效应(0.01%),没有天花板效应(0.00%),PSR=0.75。在 6 对项目中发现了 LID。PCAR 的特征值为 2.47。

结论

BARQ-R 具有良好的项目和个体拟合度。PSR 与涵盖有限对数单位范围的项目一起表明,身体意识的不同水平仅以适度的精度进行测量。添加和修改项目以涵盖更广泛的身体意识范围,并更好地解决内部身体意识和身体运动的概念,将提高 BARQ-R 的效用。在研究或临床应用之前,还需要进一步分析。此外,还需要在其他身体意识缺陷人群中,如中风或脊髓损伤,进行 BARQ-R 的 Rasch 验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cbc/11462683/f75f09894562/12891_2024_7893_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cbc/11462683/8b7e74ee1563/12891_2024_7893_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cbc/11462683/f75f09894562/12891_2024_7893_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cbc/11462683/8b7e74ee1563/12891_2024_7893_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cbc/11462683/f75f09894562/12891_2024_7893_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Rasch validation of the revised body awareness rating questionnaire (BARQ-R) in adults with and without musculoskeletal pain.修订后的身体意识评定问卷(BARQ-R)在有和无肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年人中的 Rasch 验证。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 9;25(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07893-1.
2
The Revised Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire: Development Into a Unidimensional Scale Using Rasch Analysis.修订后的身体意识评定问卷:使用 Rasch 分析将其发展为一个单维量表。
Phys Ther. 2018 Feb 1;98(2):122-132. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx111.
3
Finding functionality: Rasch analysis of the Functionality Appreciation Scale in community-dwelling adults in the US.寻找功能:美国社区居住成年人功能鉴赏量表的拉施分析
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Oct 2;4:1222892. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1222892. eCollection 2023.
4
Preliminary Rasch analysis of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness in adults with stroke.初步 Rasch 分析成人脑卒中患者内脏感知多维评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 2;18(6):e0286657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286657. eCollection 2023.
5
Physical body experiences questionnaire simplified for active aging (PBE-QAG): Rasch validation.身体体验问卷简化版用于积极老龄化(PBE-QAG):Rasch 验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 10;18(2):e0280198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280198. eCollection 2023.
6
Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Strabismus: A Modification of the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) Questionnaire Using Rasch Analysis.测量斜视患者与健康相关的生活质量:使用拉施分析对成人斜视-20(AS-20)问卷进行的修改。
PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0127064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127064. eCollection 2015.
7
Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale.一种用于测量日常生活中上肢使用依赖性的新量表的Rasch验证:基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的上肢卢塞恩多学科观察量表
Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 10;14:1154322. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1154322. eCollection 2023.
8
Is the Patient Activation Measure a valid measure of osteoarthritis self-management attitudes and capabilities? Results of a Rasch analysis.患者激活度量表(PAM)是否能有效测量骨关节炎自我管理的态度和能力?一项 Rasch 分析的结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 May 5;18(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01364-6.
9
Psychometric properties of the painDETECT questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: Rasch analysis and test-retest reliability.疼痛检测问卷在类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和脊柱关节炎中的心理测量学特性:拉施分析与重测信度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 22;15(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0681-1.
10
Rasch validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) in community-dwelling adults.社区居民成年人的华威-爱丁堡心理幸福感量表(WEMWBS)的 Rasch 验证。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Feb 17;11(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01058-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Fatigue and Depressive Mood in Chronic Low Back Pain.慢性下背痛的疲劳与抑郁情绪。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2024 Jun;25(3):225-230. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.02.003. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
2
Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial.使用远程传授的春森林气功™减轻脊髓损伤成人的神经性疼痛:一项非随机对照试验。
medRxiv. 2023 Feb 15:2023.02.11.23285793. doi: 10.1101/2023.02.11.23285793.
3
Reporting Guideline for RULER: Rasch Reporting Guideline for Rehabilitation Research: Explanation and Elaboration.
RULER 报告准则:康复研究 Rasch 报告准则:解释与说明。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul;103(7):1487-1498. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.019. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
4
Rasch Reporting Guideline for Rehabilitation Research (RULER): the RULER Statement.Rasch 康复研究报告准则(RULER):RULER 声明。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul;103(7):1477-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
5
On the body-mind nexus in chronic musculoskeletal pain: A scoping review.躯体-心理关联在慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛中的作用:范围综述。
Eur J Pain. 2022 Jul;26(6):1186-1202. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1944. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
6
Factors affecting body awareness in older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain.影响患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的老年人身体意识的因素。
Arch Med Sci. 2019 Jul 17;17(4):934-939. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.86614. eCollection 2021.
7
Mindfulness, Interoception, and the Body: A Contemporary Perspective.正念、内感受与身体:当代视角
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 13;10:2012. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02012. eCollection 2019.
8
Coupling Inner and Outer Body for Self-Consciousness.内外体耦合与自我意识。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 May;23(5):377-388. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
9
Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap.内感受与心理健康:路线图。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Jun;3(6):501-513. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
10
Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice.在李克特量表中使用反向项目:一种有问题的做法。
Psicothema. 2018 May;30(2):149-158. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2018.33.