• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订后的身体意识评定问卷:使用 Rasch 分析将其发展为一个单维量表。

The Revised Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire: Development Into a Unidimensional Scale Using Rasch Analysis.

机构信息

Physiotherapy Research Group, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Physiotherapy Research Group, University of Bergen, Kalfarveien 31, N-5018 Bergen, Norway.

Physiotherapy Research Group, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2018 Feb 1;98(2):122-132. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx111.

DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzx111
PMID:29096009
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire (BARQ) is a self-report questionnaire aimed at capturing how people with long-lasting musculoskeletal pain reflect on their own body awareness. Methods based on classical test theory were applied to the development of the instrument and resulted in 4 subscales. However, the scales were not correlated, and construct validity might be questioned.

OBJECTIVE

The primary purpose of this study was to explore the possibility of developing a unidimensional scale from items initially collected for the BARQ using Rasch analysis. A secondary purpose was to investigate the test-retest reliability of a revised version of the BARQ.

DESIGN

This was a methodological study.

METHODS

Rasch and reliability analyses were performed for 3 samples of participants with long-lasting musculoskeletal pain. The first Rasch analysis was carried out on 66 items generated for the original BARQ and scored by 300 participants. The items supported by the first analysis were scored by a new group of 127 participants and analyzed in a second Rasch analysis. For the test-retest reliability analysis, 48 participants scored the revised BARQ items twice within 1 week.

RESULTS

The 2-step Rasch analysis resulted in a unidimensional 12-item revised version of the BARQ with a 4-point response scale (scores from 0 to 36). It showed a good fit to the Rasch model, with acceptable internal consistency, satisfactory fit residuals, and no disordered thresholds. Test-retest reliability was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .83 (95% CI = .71-.89) and a smallest detectable change of 6.3 points.

LIMITATIONS

The small sample size in the second Rasch analysis was a study limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

The revised BARQ is a unidimensional and feasible measurement of body awareness, recommended for use in the context of body-mind physical therapy approaches for musculoskeletal conditions.

摘要

背景

身体感知评定问卷(BARQ)是一种自我报告问卷,旨在捕捉患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的人如何看待自己的身体感知。该工具的开发采用了基于经典测试理论的方法,结果产生了 4 个分量表。然而,这些分量表之间没有相关性,因此其结构效度可能存在问题。

目的

本研究的主要目的是探索使用 Rasch 分析从最初为 BARQ 收集的项目中开发单一维度量表的可能性。次要目的是调查 BARQ 修订版的重测信度。

设计

这是一项方法学研究。

方法

对 3 组患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的参与者进行了 Rasch 分析和信度分析。首次 Rasch 分析对原始 BARQ 的 66 个项目进行,由 300 名参与者评分。对第一项分析中支持的项目,由新的 127 名参与者进行评分,并进行第二次 Rasch 分析。为了进行重测信度分析,48 名参与者在 1 周内对修订后的 BARQ 项目进行了两次评分。

结果

两步 Rasch 分析得到了一个具有 4 点反应刻度(0 到 36 分)的 12 项修订版 BARQ 单维版本。它与 Rasch 模型拟合良好,具有可接受的内部一致性、满意的拟合残差和无无序阈值。重测信度较高,组内相关系数为 0.83(95%CI=0.71-0.89),最小可检测变化为 6.3 分。

局限性

第二次 Rasch 分析的样本量小是研究的局限性。

结论

修订后的 BARQ 是一种身体感知的多维且可行的测量方法,建议在身心物理治疗方法治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的背景下使用。

相似文献

1
The Revised Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire: Development Into a Unidimensional Scale Using Rasch Analysis.修订后的身体意识评定问卷:使用 Rasch 分析将其发展为一个单维量表。
Phys Ther. 2018 Feb 1;98(2):122-132. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx111.
2
Rasch validation of the revised body awareness rating questionnaire (BARQ-R) in adults with and without musculoskeletal pain.修订后的身体意识评定问卷(BARQ-R)在有和无肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年人中的 Rasch 验证。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 9;25(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07893-1.
3
Body awareness and chronic low back pain: validity and reliability study of Turkish version of body awareness rating scale.身体意识与慢性下腰痛:身体意识评定量表土耳其语版的效度和信度研究
Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Jun 23;50(4):849-854. doi: 10.3906/sag-1911-110.
4
Psychometric properties of the painDETECT questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: Rasch analysis and test-retest reliability.疼痛检测问卷在类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和脊柱关节炎中的心理测量学特性:拉施分析与重测信度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 22;15(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0681-1.
5
Reliability and responsiveness of measures of pain in people with osteoarthritis of the knee: a psychometric evaluation.膝骨关节炎患者疼痛测量指标的可靠性和反应性:一项心理测量学评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Apr;39(8):822-829. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1161840. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
6
Does the Brief-BESTest Meet Classical Test Theory and Rasch Analysis Requirements for Balance Assessment in People With Neurological Disorders?简易BESTest是否符合经典测试理论和Rasch分析对神经疾病患者平衡评估的要求?
Phys Ther. 2016 Oct;96(10):1610-1619. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150550. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
7
Psychometric properties of the pain stages of change questionnaire as evaluated by Rasch analysis in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.通过拉施分析评估慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者疼痛阶段变化问卷的心理测量特性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 19;15:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-95.
8
Validation of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QoL) and the adjusted DSWAL-QoL (aDSWAL-QoL) using item analysis with the Rasch model: a pilot study.使用拉施模型进行项目分析对荷兰版吞咽生活质量问卷(DSWAL-QoL)及调整后的DSWAL-QoL(aDSWAL-QoL)进行验证:一项试点研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 7;15(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0639-3.
9
Measurement properties of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire: Rasch analysis of responses from a traumatic hand injury population.密歇根手功能问卷的测量性能:创伤性手部损伤人群的 Rasch 分析反应。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jul;44(15):4081-4089. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1894246. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
10
Development of the Italian Version of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire in Subjects with Chronic Low Back Pain: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability and Validity.慢性下腰痛患者疼痛警觉与意识问卷意大利语版的编制:跨文化调适、验证性因素分析、信度与效度
Int J Behav Med. 2016 Apr;23(2):214-23. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9507-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Affective Associations With Physical Activity via a Message-Based mHealth Intervention (WalkToJoy): Proof-of-Concept Study.通过基于信息的移动健康干预(WalkToJoy)改善与体育活动的情感关联:概念验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 8;27:e75792. doi: 10.2196/75792.
2
Rasch validation of the revised body awareness rating questionnaire (BARQ-R) in adults with and without musculoskeletal pain.修订后的身体意识评定问卷(BARQ-R)在有和无肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年人中的 Rasch 验证。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 9;25(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07893-1.
3
Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: protocol of a quasi-experimental feasibility clinical trial.
运用远程传授的春森林气功™减轻脊髓损伤成人的神经性疼痛:一项半实验性可行性临床试验方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Aug 22;9(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01374-3.
4
Identifying Body Awareness-Related Brain Network Changes After Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation for Neuropathic Pain Relief in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol of a Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial.识别躯体意识相关脑网络变化:一项成人脊髓损伤神经病理性疼痛认知多感觉康复的 I 期随机对照试验方案。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2022 Fall;28(4):33-43. doi: 10.46292/sci22-00006. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
5
Item Reduction, Psychometric and Biometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Body Perception Questionnaire-Short Form (BPQ-SF): The BPQ-22.身体知觉问卷短式量表(BPQ-SF)意大利版的项目缩减、心理计量学和生物计量特性:BPQ-22。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 6;18(7):3835. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073835.