Torrez Timothy W, Amick Michael, Njoku Ndidi, Zhang Emily, Stephens Senah E, Makarewich Christopher A
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah.
Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2025 Feb 1;45(2):100-106. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002843. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
Removal of the metaphyseal screw from tension band plate constructs after correction of angular deformity in patients treated with hemiepiphysiodesis has been suggested as an alternative to removing the plate and both screws. While this has the potential benefit of easier implant removal and reinsertion in the event of rebound, there is debate in the literature regarding the benefits and risks of leaving the epiphyseal screw and plate in place.
Patients treated with hemiepiphysiodesis at the distal femur and/or proximal tibia with tension band plates and screws who underwent subsequent removal of the metaphyseal screw after correction were included. Charts and radiographs were reviewed for the need for metaphyseal screw reinsertion, subsequent removal of deep implants, and evidence of physeal tethering. Tethering was defined as progressive overcorrection in the treated bone segment after removal of the metaphyseal screw with the mechanical axis moving one full mechanical axis zone or more. Patients with tethering were compared with those without.
A total of 215 patients with 387 limbs treated met inclusion criteria. Of those, 175 patients were treated for idiopathic genu valgum, while 40 were treated for other conditions. Fifty-nine individuals (27%) underwent replacement of the metaphyseal screw for repeat angular correction. Fifty-one percent of patients underwent secondary procedures for reasons other than metaphyseal screw reinsertion (74 symptomatic implant removal, 7 elective implant removal, 29 due to tethering). There were 44 cases of tethering in 36 patients (17%). In cases of tethering, 7 patients were treated with observation, 11 with implant removal only, 16 with hemiepiphysiodesis on the opposite side, and 2 with osteotomy. Patients with tethering were significantly younger, more likely to be male, and more likely to have had the metaphyseal screw removed more than once ( P < 0.05).
Removal of only the metaphyseal screw after hemiepiphysiodesis has high rates of tethering and further surgery for iatrogenic deformity correction and implant removal. This technique is not recommended.
Therapeutic Level III, case-control study.
对于接受半骨骺阻滞术治疗的患者,在矫正角状畸形后从张力带钢板结构中取出干骺端螺钉已被建议作为取出钢板和两枚螺钉的替代方法。虽然这在反弹情况下具有更容易取出和重新插入植入物的潜在益处,但文献中对于将骨骺螺钉和钢板留在原位的益处和风险存在争议。
纳入在股骨远端和/或胫骨近端接受半骨骺阻滞术并使用张力带钢板和螺钉治疗、矫正后随后取出干骺端螺钉的患者。回顾病历和X线片,以确定是否需要重新插入干骺端螺钉、随后取出深部植入物以及骨骺束缚的证据。束缚定义为在取出干骺端螺钉后,治疗骨段出现渐进性过度矫正,机械轴移动一个完整的机械轴区域或更多。将有束缚的患者与无束缚的患者进行比较。
共有215例患者的387条肢体符合纳入标准。其中,175例患者因特发性膝外翻接受治疗,40例患者因其他情况接受治疗。59例患者(27%)为重复角状矫正而更换了干骺端螺钉。51%的患者因干骺端螺钉重新插入以外的原因接受了二次手术(74例有症状的植入物取出、7例选择性植入物取出、29例因束缚)。36例患者(17%)中有44例出现束缚。在出现束缚的病例中,7例患者接受观察,11例仅取出植入物,16例在对侧进行半骨骺阻滞术,2例进行截骨术。有束缚的患者明显更年轻,更可能为男性,并且更可能不止一次取出干骺端螺钉(P<0.05)。
半骨骺阻滞术后仅取出干骺端螺钉,束缚发生率高,且因医源性畸形矫正和植入物取出而需要进一步手术。不推荐使用该技术。
治疗性III级,病例对照研究。