Suppr超能文献

一款用于采集病史的应用程序所收集的数据与基层医疗中对患者进行的面对面访谈数据的一致性。

Concordance of data collected by an app for medical history taking and in-person interviews from patients in primary care.

作者信息

Joos Carla, Albrink Klara, Hummers Eva, Müller Frank, Antweiler Kai, Schröder Dominik, Noack Eva Maria

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.

Department of Family Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, United States.

出版信息

JAMIA Open. 2024 Oct 7;7(4):ooae102. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae102. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the concordance of patient information collected using a medical history app compared to in-person interviews.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study we used an app to collect medical data from patients in family practice in Germany. Collected information included age, height, weight, perceived severity of complaints, and 38 current complaints. Subsequently, in-person interviews based on the query structure of the app were conducted with patients directly after the patient finished filling out the app. Concordance was assessed as exact matches between the data collected app-based and in-person interviews, with the in-person interview as a reference. Regression analysis examined which patient characteristics were associated with mismatching and underreporting of complaints.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-nine patients were included in the study. Concordance of reported age, weight, and height, as well as perceived severity of complaints ranged from 76.2% to 96.7%. Across all 38 complaints, 64.4% of participants showed completely identical complaint selection in app-based and in-person interviews; 18.5% of all participants overreported; and 17.0% underreported at least 1 complaint when using the app. Male sex, higher age, and higher number of stated complaints were associated with higher odds of underreporting at least one complaint in the app.

DISCUSSION

App-collected data regarding age, weight, height, and perceived severity of complaints showed high concordance. The discordance shown concerning various complaints should be examined regarding their potential for medical errors.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of apps for gathering information on complaints can improve the efficiency and quality of care but must first be improved.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register No. DRKS00026659 registered November 3, 2021. World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=DRKS00026659.

摘要

目的

本研究调查使用病史应用程序收集的患者信息与面对面访谈收集的信息之间的一致性。

材料与方法

在这项横断面研究中,我们使用一款应用程序从德国家庭医生诊所的患者那里收集医疗数据。收集的信息包括年龄、身高、体重、主诉的感知严重程度以及38种当前的主诉。随后,在患者完成应用程序填写后,立即根据应用程序的查询结构对患者进行面对面访谈。以面对面访谈为参考,将基于应用程序收集的数据与面对面访谈的数据之间的完全匹配作为一致性评估标准。回归分析考察了哪些患者特征与主诉的不匹配和漏报有关。

结果

399名患者纳入研究。报告的年龄、体重和身高以及主诉的感知严重程度的一致性范围为76.2%至96.7%。在所有38种主诉中,64.4%的参与者在基于应用程序的访谈和面对面访谈中选择的主诉完全相同;18.5%的所有参与者报告过多;使用应用程序时,17.0%的参与者至少漏报了1种主诉。男性、年龄较大以及陈述的主诉数量较多与在应用程序中至少漏报1种主诉的较高几率相关。

讨论

应用程序收集的关于年龄、体重、身高和主诉感知严重程度的数据显示出高度一致性。应检查各种主诉中显示的不一致性在医疗错误方面的可能性。

结论

引入用于收集主诉信息的应用程序可以提高护理效率和质量,但首先必须加以改进。

试验注册

该研究已在德国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为DRKS00026659,于2021年11月3日注册。世界卫生组织试验注册数据集,https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=DRKS00026659

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e6/11458515/e11a6c6914cb/ooae102f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验