School of Physical Education, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410012, China.
Physical Education & Sports Science, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 637616, Singapore.
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec;183(12):5351-5362. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05813-y. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
The preschool years are a critical period for developing cognitive abilities such as reasoning, memorization, comprehension, quick thinking, and problem-solving. Sedentary behavior (SB) is known to be associated with cognitive development in preschool children. However, limited research has focused on how different types of SB (active, passive) and sedentary patterns (bouts, breaks) affect preschool children's cognitive abilities. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate: (1) the relationship between sedentary types and preschoolers' cognitive abilities; and (2) the relationship between sedentary patterns and preschoolers' cognitive abilities. Preschoolers aged 3 to 6 years (n = 353) were recruited from 5 kindergartens in Changsha, Hunan, China. Sedentary types were reported by parents, sedentary patterns were measured by preschoolers wearing an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT for seven consecutive days, and cognitive abilities were assessed using the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-IV). The relationships between variables were analyzed using multiple linear regression models. Non-screen-based active SB was associated with higher full-scale IQ and fluid reasoning index in boys and higher visual spatial index in girls. Screen-based active SB was negatively associated with overall cognitive ability. Passive SB potentially had a negative effect on overall cognitive ability, but screen-based passive SB was positively associated with higher fluid reasoning indices in girls. Preschoolers' cognitive ability was positively associated with sedentary breaks, but not with sedentary bouts.
Not all types of SB are equal when examining optimal cognitive development in preschoolers. Frequent breaks from sedentary time were associated with better cognitive development. Encouraging more frequent breaks to interrupt prolonged SB may be a viable strategy for reducing sedentary time to promote optimal cognitive development. These findings should be further validated in larger prospective studies.
• Sedentary behavior is not advantageous for cognitive development.
• Not all types of sedentary behavior are harmful. • Active sedentary behaviors are beneficial to overall cognitive development, but screen-based active sedentary behaviors may negatively impact some areas of cognitive performance. • Cognitive abilities in preschoolers are associated with sedentary breaks, but not with sedentary bouts.
非屏幕类的主动久坐行为与男孩的全量表智商和流体推理指数以及女孩的视觉空间指数呈正相关。基于屏幕的主动久坐行为与整体认知能力呈负相关。被动久坐行为可能对整体认知能力有负面影响,但基于屏幕的被动久坐行为与女孩的流体推理指数呈正相关。幼儿的认知能力与久坐休息时间呈正相关,但与久坐时间无明显关联。
在考察幼儿最佳认知发展时,并非所有类型的久坐行为都具有相同的影响。频繁地从久坐时间中休息一下与更好的认知发展有关。鼓励更频繁地休息以打断长时间的久坐可能是减少久坐时间以促进最佳认知发展的可行策略。这些发现应在更大的前瞻性研究中进一步验证。
• 久坐行为不利于认知发展。
• 并非所有类型的久坐行为都是有害的。• 主动久坐行为对整体认知发展有益,但基于屏幕的主动久坐行为可能会对某些认知表现领域产生负面影响。• 幼儿的认知能力与久坐休息时间有关,但与久坐时间无关。