Department of Psychology, University of Regina.
Am Psychol. 2024 Oct;79(7):883-892. doi: 10.1037/amp0001224.
In this open science era, psychology demands researchers be transparent in their research practices. In turn, researchers might ask if journal editors are being equally transparent in their editorial practices. Editor bias is when editors fail to be fair and impartial in their handling of articles. Editor bias can arise because of identity-who authors are-or because of content-what authors write. Proposed solutions to editor bias include masking author identity and increasing editor diversity. What is needed is greater transparency. By being more transparent, editors would be in a better position to encourage others to embrace open science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
在这个开放科学的时代，心理学界要求研究人员在研究实践中保持透明。反过来，研究人员可能会问期刊编辑在编辑实践中是否同样透明。编辑偏见是指编辑在处理文章时未能做到公平公正。编辑偏见可能源于作者的身份，也可能源于作者的文章内容。为了解决编辑偏见问题，提出了一些解决方案，包括掩盖作者身份和增加编辑多样性。需要的是更大的透明度。编辑通过提高透明度，将能够更好地鼓励其他人接受开放科学。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA，保留所有权利)。
