Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
Am Psychol. 2024 Oct;79(7):896-897. doi: 10.1037/amp0001301.
Sharpe (2024) draws attention to the role that editors may play in perpetuating bias in the published psychological literature. While Sharpe focuses on perspective-related diversity in reducing such bias, I argue that identity-related diversity is paramount. Editors play an important role in diversifying the scholarly conversation by recruiting diverse reviewers and providing clear and encouraging feedback on submissions. Further, enhancing the identities represented in the scholarly conversation is crucial to ensuring that editorial decisions are well-informed, that published science is of high quality, and that published literature is less biased. In addition to bringing scholarly expertise, editors must embrace a compassionate, humble, and courageous stance in their role as gatekeepers for our science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
夏普（2024 年）提请人们注意编辑在使已发表的心理学文献中的偏见永久化方面可能发挥的作用。虽然夏普专注于与视角相关的多样性，以减少这种偏见，但我认为与身份相关的多样性至关重要。编辑通过招募不同的审稿人并对提交的稿件提供清晰和鼓励性的反馈，在使学术对话多样化方面发挥着重要作用。此外，增强学术对话中所代表的身份对于确保编辑决策有充分的依据、发表的科学具有高质量以及发表的文献偏见较小至关重要。除了带来学术专业知识外，编辑在担任我们科学的把关人时，还必须在他们的角色中采取富有同情心、谦逊和勇敢的立场。（PsycInfo 数据库记录（c）2024 APA，保留所有权利）。
