论编辑偏见和透明度：回应考恩（2024）、金（2024）和瑟斯顿和努尔（2024）。
On editor bias and transparency: Reply to Cowan (2024), King (2024), and Thurston and Noor (2024).
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of Regina.
出版信息
Am Psychol. 2024 Oct;79(7):901-902. doi: 10.1037/amp0001316.
PMID:39388128
Abstract
Cowan's (2024), King's (2024), and Thurston and Noor's (2024) commentaries on my article (Sharpe, 2024) find us in agreement on many matters relating to editor transparency and bias. Where we disagree is in the extent of change required and the rationale behind undertaking that change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
摘要
考恩（2024）、金（2024）、瑟斯顿和努尔（2024）对我文章（夏普，2024）的评论，我们在与编辑透明度和偏见相关的许多问题上达成一致。我们的分歧在于需要进行的变革程度以及进行这种变革的理由。（PsycInfo Database Record（c）2024 APA，保留所有权利）。
Zotero 插件