Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (1st arm work performed), Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024 Dec 1;137(6):1524-1534. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00138.2024. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
Most approaches to advance simplified physiology-based precision medicine strategies for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) focus on sleep parameters (i.e., OSA endotypes). However, wakefulness physiology measures can also provide prediction insight for certain OSA therapies, yet their relationship with sleep parameters has not been extensively investigated. This study aimed to investigate potential relationships between awake ventilatory control parameters and sleep OSA endotypes and their potential to predict changes in OSA severity with morphine. Data were acquired from a randomized, crossover trial that investigated the effects of morphine versus placebo on OSA severity and underlying mechanisms. Here, awake ventilatory chemoreflex testing before overnight polysomnography was compared with direct measures of sleep respiratory control (e.g., hypercapnic ventilatory responses and loop gain) and OSA endotypes during a separate overnight physiology study [pharyngeal critical closure pressure (Pcrit), muscle responsiveness via genioglossus intramuscular electromyography, and arousal threshold via epiglottic pressure catheter to transient continuous positive airway pressure reductions]. Twenty-one men with OSA completed both study arms. During placebo, ) awake chemosensitivity correlated with Pcrit ( = 0.726, = 0.001), ) arousal threshold correlated with awake CO ventilatory response threshold ( = -0.467, = 0.047) and basal ventilation ( = -0.500, = 0.029). Awake chemosensitivity and Pcrit also correlated with the apnea-hypopnea index ( < 0.001) during placebo. Awake chemosensitivity was predictive of changes in OSA severity with morphine ( = -0.535, = 0.013). In conclusion, awake measures of respiratory control are related to physiological endotypes, such as airway collapsibility and arousal threshold during sleep and OSA severity. Awake ventilatory chemosensitivity has the best potential to predict changes in OSA severity with morphine. Both awake ventilatory control measures and OSA endotypes measured during sleep have reported potentials in endotyping/phenotyping OSA, although no randomized, controlled trial has compared/linked between the two techniques. From a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial, we found that awake measures of respiratory control are related to physiological endotypes such as airway collapsibility and arousal threshold during sleep and OSA severity. Awake ventilatory chemosensitivity has the best potential to predict changes in OSA severity with morphine.
大多数推进阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)简化基于生理学的精准医学策略的方法都集中在睡眠参数(即 OSA 表型)上。然而,清醒时的生理学测量也可以为某些 OSA 治疗提供预测性见解,但它们与睡眠参数的关系尚未得到广泛研究。本研究旨在探讨清醒时通气控制参数与睡眠 OSA 表型之间的潜在关系及其预测吗啡治疗 OSA 严重程度变化的能力。数据来自一项随机交叉试验,该试验研究了吗啡与安慰剂对 OSA 严重程度和潜在机制的影响。在这里,在整夜多导睡眠图之前进行清醒时呼吸化学感受器测试,并与单独进行的整夜生理学研究中直接测量的睡眠呼吸控制(例如,高碳酸血症通气反应和环路增益)和 OSA 表型进行比较[咽临界闭合压(Pcrit)、颏舌肌肌内肌电图的肌肉反应性和通过会厌压导管短暂连续正压通气降低的觉醒阈值]。21 名 OSA 男性完成了两项研究。在安慰剂期间,)清醒时的化学敏感性与 Pcrit 相关(=0.726,=0.001),)觉醒阈值与清醒时 CO 通气反应阈值(= -0.467,=0.047)和基础通气(= -0.500,=0.029)相关。清醒时的化学敏感性和 Pcrit 也与安慰剂期间的呼吸暂停低通气指数(<0.001)相关。清醒时的化学敏感性可以预测吗啡治疗 OSA 严重程度的变化(= -0.535,=0.013)。总之,睡眠期间呼吸控制的清醒测量与生理表型相关,例如气道塌陷性和觉醒阈值,以及 OSA 严重程度。清醒时的通气化学敏感性最有可能预测吗啡治疗 OSA 严重程度的变化。睡眠期间测量的清醒通气控制措施和 OSA 表型都具有表型/表型 OSA 的潜力,尽管没有随机对照试验比较/链接这两种技术。来自一项双盲、随机安慰剂对照交叉试验,我们发现睡眠期间呼吸控制的清醒测量与气道塌陷性和睡眠期间和 OSA 严重程度的觉醒阈值等生理表型相关。清醒时的通气化学敏感性最有可能预测吗啡治疗 OSA 严重程度的变化。