Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship Unit, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Institute for Virology and Immunobiology, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Versbacher Str. 7, 97078 Würzburg, Germany.
EBioMedicine. 2024 Nov;109:105394. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105394. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid detection tests (RDTs) emerged as point-of-care diagnostics alongside reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as reference.
In a prospective performance assessment from 12 November 2020 to 30 June 2023 at a single centre tertiary care hospital, the sensitivity and specificity (primary endpoints) of RDTs from three manufacturers (NADAL®, Panbio™, MEDsan®) were compared to RT-qPCR as reference standard among patients, accompanying persons and staff aged ≥ six month in large-scale, clinical screening use. Regression models were used to assess influencing factors on RDT performance (secondary endpoints).
Among 78,798 paired RDT/RT-qPCR results analysed, overall RDT sensitivity was 34.5% (695/2016; 95% CI 32.4-36.6%), specificity 99.6% (76,503/76,782; 95% CI 99.6-99.7%). Over the pandemic course, sensitivity decreased in line with a lower rate of individuals showing typical COVID-19 symptoms. The lasso regression model showed that a higher viral load and typical COVID-19 symptoms were directly significantly correlated with the likelihood of a positive RDT result in SARS-CoV-2 infection, whereas age, sex, vaccination status, and the Omicron VOC were not.
The decline in RDT sensitivity throughout the pandemic can primarily be attributed to the reduced prevalence of symptomatic infections among vaccinated individuals and individuals infected with Omicron VOC. RDTs remain valuable for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic individuals and offer potential for detecting other respiratory pathogens in the post-pandemic era, underscoring their importance in infection control efforts.
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Free State of Bavaria, Bavarian State Ministry of Health and Care.
SARS-CoV-2 抗原快速检测(RDT)与逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)一起作为即时检测方法出现,成为参考标准。
在 2020 年 11 月 12 日至 2023 年 6 月 30 日期间,在一家单一中心的三级保健医院进行了前瞻性性能评估,来自三家制造商(NADAL®、Panbio™、MEDsan®)的 RDT 与 RT-qPCR 作为参考标准进行比较,以评估其在大规模临床筛查中≥6 个月的患者、陪伴者和工作人员中的敏感性和特异性(主要终点)。回归模型用于评估 RDT 性能的影响因素(次要终点)。
在分析的 78798 对 RDT/RT-qPCR 结果中,总体 RDT 敏感性为 34.5%(695/2016;95%CI 32.4-36.6%),特异性为 99.6%(76,503/76,782;95%CI 99.6-99.7%)。在大流行过程中,敏感性随着表现出典型 COVID-19 症状的个体比例降低而降低。套索回归模型显示,较高的病毒载量和典型的 COVID-19 症状与 SARS-CoV-2 感染中 RDT 阳性结果的可能性直接显著相关,而年龄、性别、疫苗接种状态和奥密克戎 VOC 则没有。
整个大流行期间 RDT 敏感性的下降主要归因于接种疫苗的个体和感染奥密克戎 VOC 的个体中症状性感染的患病率降低。RDT 仍然可以用于检测有症状的个体中的 SARS-CoV-2,并有可能在大流行后检测其他呼吸道病原体,突出了它们在感染控制工作中的重要性。
德国联邦教育和研究部(BMBF)、巴伐利亚自由州、巴伐利亚州卫生部和护理部。