Suppr超能文献

用于检测新型冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)与胶体金免疫层析法的对比分析

Comparative Analysis of RT-PCR and a Colloidal Gold Immunochromatographic Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.

作者信息

Li Hui, Liu Dakai, Zhou Qiang, Rodriguez George D, Pietz Harlan, Singh Vishnu, Konadu Eric, James Keither K, Lui Calvin, Shao Mingyu, Chen Junyu, Schreiner Andrew, Urban Carl, Truong James, Prasad Nishant, Rodgers William Harry

机构信息

Department of Pathology & Clinical Laboratories, NewYork-Presbyterian Queens, 56-45 Main Street Flushing, New York, NY 11355, USA.

Clinical Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 250 Changgang East Road Zhuhai District, Guangzhou 510260, China.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 28;15(11):1362. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15111362.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the urgent need for rapid, accurate, and accessible diagnostic testing to effectively manage and contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2. RT-PCR is widely recognized as the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 detection due to its high sensitivity and specificity. However, RT-PCR testing requires specialized laboratory equipment, highly trained personnel, and extended processing times, which limits its feasibility for large-scale screening and point-of-care applications. This study aims to systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of RT-PCR and a colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay (GICA). : By comparing these two methods, we seek to determine a GICA's effectiveness as a complementary or alternative diagnostic tool, particularly in resource-limited settings and scenarios requiring rapid, large-scale testing. We assessed the following key clinical parameters: sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy. Additionally, we investigated the correlation between GICA signal intensity and RT-PCR Ct values using regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and the calculated area under the curve. : Our findings indicate that while RT-PCR exhibits superior sensitivity, GICA results demonstrate a strong correlation with RT-PCR results and provide a rapid, cost-effective alternative for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Unlike RT-PCR, which requires extensive resources and prolonged turnaround times, a GICA delivers results within 20 min, making it a viable option for decentralized testing and real-time public health interventions. : These results suggest that a GICA can serve as a complementary diagnostic tool alongside RT-PCR, particularly in resource-limited settings and high-throughput screening scenarios. By integrating GICAs into broader testing strategies, healthcare systems can enhance early detection efforts, improve accessibility to diagnostics, and strengthen pandemic response measures.

摘要

新冠疫情凸显了对快速、准确且可及的诊断检测的迫切需求,以有效管理和控制严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的传播。逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)因其高灵敏度和特异性,被广泛认为是SARS-CoV-2检测的金标准。然而,RT-PCR检测需要专门的实验室设备、训练有素的人员以及较长的处理时间,这限制了其在大规模筛查和即时检测应用中的可行性。本研究旨在系统评估RT-PCR和胶体金免疫层析法(GICA)的诊断性能。通过比较这两种方法,我们试图确定GICA作为一种补充或替代诊断工具的有效性,特别是在资源有限的环境以及需要快速、大规模检测的情况下。我们评估了以下关键临床参数:灵敏度、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)和准确性。此外,我们使用回归分析、受试者工作特征曲线分析以及计算曲线下面积,研究了GICA信号强度与RT-PCR Ct值之间的相关性。我们的研究结果表明,虽然RT-PCR具有更高的灵敏度,但GICA结果与RT-PCR结果显示出很强的相关性,并为SARS-CoV-2检测提供了一种快速、经济高效的替代方法。与需要大量资源和较长周转时间的RT-PCR不同,GICA在20分钟内即可得出结果,使其成为分散检测和实时公共卫生干预的可行选择。这些结果表明,GICA可作为RT-PCR的补充诊断工具,特别是在资源有限的环境和高通量筛查场景中。通过将GICA纳入更广泛的检测策略,医疗系统可以加强早期检测工作,提高诊断的可及性,并加强疫情应对措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e12/12154499/ffe16a32b337/diagnostics-15-01362-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验