Department of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212000, Jiangsu, China.
Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212000, Jiangsu, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 10;14(1):23734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75267-7.
Calcaneal body fractures are often associated with varying degrees of shortening deformities. Restoring calcaneal length is crucial for the functional prognosis of the foot. Through finite element analysis, this study compared the biomechanical effects of multiple fixation schemes for calcaneal fractures. We delineated and assembled the finite element model of the Sanders type II calcaneal fracture and four internal fixation simulations (namely distraction screw, lag screw, frame locking plate, and T-shaped locking plate). Different axial forces (350, 700, and 1400 N) were then applied to simulate various postures. We then compared the inner and outer shortening distances (D1 and D2, respectively), equivalent von Mises stress, and maximum von Mises stress of the calcaneus. In the individual model, with an increase in the pressure, D1, D2, and the maximum von Mises stress gradually increased. At 1400 N, D1 and D2 for the internal fixation schemes were as follows: distraction screw (0.03 mm, 0.1 mm) < T-shaped locking plate (0.45 mm, 0.26 mm) < frame locking plate (0.50 mm, 0.26 mm) < lag screw (0.66 mm, 0.64 mm). The maximum von Mises stress values for the internal fixation methods were as follows: lag screw (491.0 MPa) < distraction screw (663.1 MPa) < frame locking plate (772.7 MPa) < T-shaped locking plate (931.8 MPa). In patients with calcaneal body fractures, the distraction screw is a potential therapeutic option for resisting calcaneal shortening.
跟骨体骨折常伴有不同程度的短缩畸形。恢复跟骨长度对于足的功能预后至关重要。本研究通过有限元分析比较了多种跟骨骨折内固定方案的生物力学效应。我们描绘并组装了 Sanders Ⅱ型跟骨骨折的有限元模型和四种内固定模拟(即: 牵张螺钉、 拉力螺钉、 框架锁定钢板和 T 型锁定钢板)。然后施加不同的轴向力(350、700 和 1400 N)模拟各种姿势。接着比较了跟骨的内、外缩短距离(分别为 D1 和 D2)、等效 von Mises 应力和最大 von Mises 应力。在个体模型中,随着压力的增加,D1、D2 和最大 von Mises 应力逐渐增加。在 1400 N 时,各内固定方案的 D1 和 D2 如下: 牵张螺钉(0.03 mm,0.1 mm)<T 型锁定钢板(0.45 mm,0.26 mm)<框架锁定钢板(0.50 mm,0.26 mm)<拉力螺钉(0.66 mm,0.64 mm)。内固定方法的最大 von Mises 应力值如下: 拉力螺钉(491.0 MPa)<牵张螺钉(663.1 MPa)<框架锁定钢板(772.7 MPa)<T 型锁定钢板(931.8 MPa)。在跟骨体骨折患者中,牵张螺钉是一种潜在的抵抗跟骨缩短的治疗选择。